Politico headline suggest GOP “hypocrisy” is somehow worse than being forced to go a nuclear option because the Department of Justice refuses to prosecute their head Merrick Garland for contempt of congress in the same way the DOJ prosecuted former Trump cabinet members Peter Navaro and Steve Bannon
Go to Article
Excerpt from www.politico.com
House Republicans are openly skeptical of holding Attorney General Merrick Garland in “inherent contempt.” But they just might vote to do it this week.
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) is expected to trigger a vote Wednesday on her resolution, which would hold Garland in “inherent contempt” over the Justice Department’s refusal to hand over audio of President Joe Biden’s interview with former special counsel Robert Hur.
In a bid to assuage concerns from her GOP colleagues, Luna changed her resolution from allowing the House sergeant-at-arms to take Garland into custody to instead fining him $10,000 per day until he hands over the audio, which Biden has asserted executive privilege over.
The first draft of the resolution was expected to garner enough GOP opposition to tank it. But Republicans privately acknowledge there’s a chance Luna’s revised resolution could pass this week — not necessarily because GOP lawmakers enthusiastically support it, but because they won’t vote against it.
1 thought on “House Republicans don’t love inherent contempt. They might vote for it anyway.– www.politico.com”