07-01-Culture Select

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis is Fighting Fraud Behind Pro-Abortion Amendment 4– www.lifenews.com

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis is Fighting Fraud Behind Pro-Abortion Amendment 4– www.lifenews.com

pgnewser September 16, 2024

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis is Fighting Fraud Behind Pro-Abortion Amendment 4– www.lifenews.com
Source Link
Excerpt:

Deputy Secretary of State for Legal Affairs and Election Integrity Brad McVay has asked law enforcement to investigate claims of “illegal petition forms” and “voter fraud” related to the pro-abortion amendment 4.

Pro-life voters in Palm Beach County claim their signatures were forged on the original petition for Amendment 4 to be placed on the November ballot. The amendment was proposed by the pro-abortion group Floridians Protecting Freedom.

For the then-proposed amendment to get on the November 5 ballot, Floridians Protecting Freedom needed over 891,523 signatures on the initial petition.

Amendment 4 would create provisions in Florida’s state constitution so that:

No law shall prohibit, penalize, delay, or restrict abortion before viability or when necessary to protect the patient’s health, as determined by the patient’s healthcare provider. This amendment does not change the Legislature’s constitutional authority to require notification to a parent or guardian before a minor has an abortion.

Klaus Schwab says world is on ‘the cusp of a profound systemic transformation’– www.lifesitenews.com

Klaus Schwab says world is on ‘the cusp of a profound systemic transformation’– www.lifesitenews.com

pgnewser September 13, 2024

Klaus Schwab says world is on ‘the cusp of a profound systemic transformation’– www.lifesitenews.com
Source Link
Excerpt:

(The Sociable) — World Economic Forum (WEF) founder Klaus Schwab says that the world is undergoing a profound systemic transformation driven by five interconnected shifts.

In the introduction to the WEF Annual Report 2023-2024, the WEF founder said that we were living in transformative times and that there were a handful of factors driving this systemic transformation:

We are on the cusp of a profound systemic transformation driven by interconnected shifts in a rapidly changing world

The five “interconnected shifts” include:

  • Transition from the industrial to the intelligent age,
  • Conflictual transition from a unipolar to a multipolar world,
  • Need to transition to a green economy,
  • Demographic shifts from a young to an ageing world,
  • Societal polarization and rise of misinformation.
Kamala Harris: It’s “Immoral” to Protect Babies From Abortion– www.lifenews.com

Kamala Harris: It’s “Immoral” to Protect Babies From Abortion– www.lifenews.com

pgnewser September 13, 2024

Do Dems Believe Men Get A Choice Whether Their Children Live?– thefederalist.com
Source Link
Excerpt:

Kamala Harris touted herself as a champion for abortion in Tuesday’s debate, framing this life-and-death issue as a basic freedom. She told viewers she would “be a president that will protect our fundamental rights and freedoms, including the right of a woman to make decisions about her own body and not have her government tell her what to do.”

This theme of abortion as “freedom” has run throughout her campaign, placing so-called abortion rights above the right to life and moving far beyond the former Democrat position of abortion being “safe, legal, and rare.” Tim Walz stands firmly with Harris, famously declaring: “We respect our neighbors and the personal choices they make, even if we wouldn’t make the same choices for ourselves, because we know there’s a golden rule, mind your own damn business.”

But Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg raised an interesting question: What does “reproductive freedom” mean for men? Speaking at a “White Dudes for Harris” event, Buttigieg encouraged men to support Harris because he said abortion benefits them. He argued that “men are also more free in a country where we have a president who stands up for things like access to abortion care.”

 

Do Dems Believe Men Get A Choice Whether Their Children Live?– thefederalist.com

Do Dems Believe Men Get A Choice Whether Their Children Live?– thefederalist.com

pgnewser September 13, 2024

Do Dems Believe Men Get A Choice Whether Their Children Live?– thefederalist.com
Source Link
Excerpt:

Kamala Harris touted herself as a champion for abortion in Tuesday’s debate, framing this life-and-death issue as a basic freedom. She told viewers she would “be a president that will protect our fundamental rights and freedoms, including the right of a woman to make decisions about her own body and not have her government tell her what to do.”

This theme of abortion as “freedom” has run throughout her campaign, placing so-called abortion rights above the right to life and moving far beyond the former Democrat position of abortion being “safe, legal, and rare.” Tim Walz stands firmly with Harris, famously declaring: “We respect our neighbors and the personal choices they make, even if we wouldn’t make the same choices for ourselves, because we know there’s a golden rule, mind your own damn business.”

But Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg raised an interesting question: What does “reproductive freedom” mean for men? Speaking at a “White Dudes for Harris” event, Buttigieg encouraged men to support Harris because he said abortion benefits them. He argued that “men are also more free in a country where we have a president who stands up for things like access to abortion care.”

Abortion Could Be Banned Nationwide If Trump Resurrects This Zombie Law– www.scientificamerican.com

Abortion Could Be Banned Nationwide If Trump Resurrects This Zombie Law– www.scientificamerican.com

pgnewser September 13, 2024

Abortion Could Be Banned Nationwide If Trump Resurrects This Zombie Law– www.scientificamerican.com
Source Link
Excerpt:

When the Comstock Act was written, germ theory was still contested science, blood types and vitamins were medical mysteries, and the most common cause of death in the U.S. was tuberculosis, then known as consumption. And yet a movement has been gaining steam to use the 1873 law to ban a vital type of medical care nationwide: abortion. Experts say this strategy may well succeed if former president Donald Trump is elected to a second term in November.

Abortions are extremely safe—far safer than pregnancy, studies show. “Abortion is a very safe procedure,” says Glenmarie Matthews, a gynecologist at RWJBarnabas Health in New Jersey. It is also vital medical care for much of the population. “We are trying to isolate abortion care from women’s health care, but it’s all intertwined into one thing,” she says. It’s also politically popular—the clear majority of Americans believe abortion should be legal under most circumstances.

Congressional Democrats push resolution that says hospitals must provide emergency abortions – Beaumont Enterprise

Congressional Democrats push resolution that says hospitals must provide emergency abortions – Beaumont Enterprise

pgnewser September 13, 2024

Congressional Democrats push resolution that says hospitals must provide emergency abortions – Beaumont Enterprise
Source Link
Excerpt:

Congressional Democrats push resolution that says hospitals must provide emergency abortions  Beaumont Enterprise

Trump wouldn’t say whether he’d veto a national ban even as abortion remains a top election issue – Las Vegas Sun

Trump wouldn’t say whether he’d veto a national ban even as abortion remains a top election issue – Las Vegas Sun

pgnewser September 13, 2024

Trump wouldn’t say whether he’d veto a national ban even as abortion remains a top election issue – Las Vegas Sun
Source Link
Excerpt:

Former President Donald Trump repeatedly declined to say during this week’s debate if he would veto a national abortion ban if he were elected again — a question that has lingered as the Republican nominee has shifted his stances on the crucial election issue.

In Tuesday’s debate with Vice President Kamala Harris, Trump said he would not sign a federal abortion ban, insisting that a ban would not pass Congress anyway. But he refused twice to say if he would veto such legislation if it landed on his desk. Trump’s running mate, Sen. JD Vance, a Republican from Ohio, said in an interview with NBC News last month that the former president would veto a ban.

In response to moderators prompting him about Vance’s statement, Trump said: “I didn’t discuss it with JD, in all fairness. And I don’t mind if he has a certain view, but I don’t think he was speaking for me.”

BREAKING: New Hampshire Supreme Court Rules Schools May Withhold Information on Children’s Gender Transitions from Parents– conservativeroof.com

BREAKING: New Hampshire Supreme Court Rules Schools May Withhold Information on Children’s Gender Transitions from Parents– conservativeroof.com

pgnewser September 10, 2024

Go to Article
Excerpt from conservativeroof.com

The New Hampshire Supreme Court has affirmed a Manchester school district policy that permits schools to withhold information from parents about their children’s gender transitions.

This ruling, which contradicts fundamental parental rights, sends a troubling message: that schools can prioritize students’ so-called “rights” over parents’ rights to be informed and involved in their children’s lives.

 

If You Drop DEI, We’ll Drop You, Say Supermajority of Rainbow Community

If You Drop DEI, We’ll Drop You, Say Supermajority of Rainbow Community

pgnewser September 10, 2024

The LGBTQ community is ready to boycott companies that drop DEI (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion) standards according to a report from Human Rights Campaign (HRC), a militant extortionist organization that threatens companies with corporate-supported social ostracism if it doesn’t change its culture to be “gay affirming.”

HRC claims 80 percent of members of the rainbow community, or the LGBTQ community, would boycott any company that chose to stop using the anti-American, bigoted, racist standard of DEI. The support from the rainbow community at such a high level puts them at odds with the American republic itself.

Go to Article
Excerpt from news.google.com

… But new data from HRC signals that this surge in anti-DEI activity at corporations is already impacting how queer workers perceive brands and employers. In a survey of almost 2,500 respondents—all of whom identified as LGBTQ+—about 80% said they would boycott a company that had rolled back its DEI policies.

Nearly 20% of respondents said that if they worked at a company that made such a decision, they would quit or look for a new job, while a third of those surveyed said their productivity would take a hit. Many others—more than 72% of respondents—said it would impact their experience at work and make them feel less accepted.