08-02-a-Sci-Tech Highlights

Groundbreaking AI Treaty to be Signed by US, Britain, and European Union: Report – Finance Magnates

Go to Article
Excerpt:

  • This treaty aims to balance the risks of AI with the promotion of responsible innovation and the protection of human rights.
  • The AI Convention differs from the EU’s AI Act in that it applies to a broader group of countries and emphasizes human rights.

United States, Britain, and European Union member states will sign the world’s first legally binding international treaty on artificial intelligence, Reuters reported. The treaty, developed over years of negotiations, aims to address the risks posed by AI while promoting responsible innovation.

The AI Convention, adopted in May, is the result of discussions among 57 nations spearheaded by the Council of Europe, a human rights organization. This agreement is focused on protecting the human rights of those affected by AI systems and ensuring that technological progress does not come at the expense of fundamental values like human rights and the rule of law.

While the treaty may share similar goals with the European Union’s recently enacted AI Act, it is distinct in scope and application. The EU’s AI Act, which came into force last month, focuses on regulating AI systems within the EU’s internal market.

Go to Article
Excerpt from cosmosmagazine.com

A team of US and Korean researchers has developed a 3D-printing ink that makes easy-to-recycle structures without the need for any heat or light.

The ink, made from a polymer, solidifies on contact with salt and dissolves back into re-usable ink on contact with fresh water.

The researchers say their ink could be useful for disposable electronics, robotic components, and prototyping.

They’ve published their findings in Nature Communications.

The structure created via 3D-printing with a re-usable polymer ink. Credit: Donghwan Ji

Polymer inks are useful tools for 3D-printing complex, small-scale devices. But they typically need high amounts of energy or extra solvents to print properly.

The researchers’ method uses a polymer called poly(N-isopropylacrylamide), or PNIPAM. This is a non-toxic substance used by the pharmaceutical industry for drug delivery systems.

PNIPAM dissolves in water to make a liquid, but it solidifies when it comes into contact with a salty calcium chloride solution.

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is accusing TikTok of sending personal data about American citizens to the Chinese Communist Party. The department filed a formal accusation, accusing the parent company, ByteDance of violating U.S. law.

The filing states, “This resulted in certain sensitive US person data being contained in Lark channels and, therefore, stored on Chinese servers and accessible to ByteDance employees located in China… Lark contained multiple internal search tools that had been developed and run by China-based ByteDance engineers for scraping TikTok user data, including US user data… bulk user information based on the user’s content or expressions, including views on gun control, abortion, and religion.”

Go to Article
Excerpt from www.theregister.com

The US Department of Justice has alleged that TikTok shipped personal information to China and allowed profiling of the short video app’s users based on their attitudes to some ticklish topics.

The Department’s views emerged in a filing [PDF] from the US government in response to attempts by TikTok and its parent company ByteDance to strike down laws that force a sale of the platform’s stateside operations – and closure if that can’t be arranged.

The filing details an internal tool called Lark that TikTok staff use for internal communications. The DoJ alleges “significant amounts of restricted US user data (including but not limited to personally identifiable information)” was shared over Lark.

“This resulted in certain sensitive US person data being contained in Lark channels and, therefore, stored on Chinese servers and accessible to ByteDance employees located in China,” the filing asserts.

It gets worse: the filing claims “Lark contained multiple internal search tools that had been developed and run by China-based ByteDance engineers for scraping TikTok user data, including US user data.”

The CrowdStrike Update glitch that led to global systems shutting down, including airports and governments, may have cost $5.4 billion in collective losses, with healthcare, banking, and the airline industry being the most impacted. The shutdown occurred on July 19, 2024, after CrowdStrike pushed out an update to millions of computers worldwide.

The update was never intended to be pushed, but a bug in the system allowed an update in testing mode to be let loose into the whole system. The update essentially led to the blue screen of death for users. If you didn’t use CrowdStrike, an Internet Security provider, you were safe from the worldwide blue screens of death of 2024.

Go to Article
Excerpt from amp.scmp.com

Insurers have begun calculating the financial damage caused by last week’s devastating CrowdStrike software glitch that crashed computers, canceled flights and disrupted hospitals all around the globe — and the picture isn’t pretty.

What’s been described as the largest IT outage in history will cost Fortune 500 companies alone more than $5 billion in direct losses, according to one insurer’s analysis of the incident published Wednesday.

The new figures put into stark relief how a single automated software update brought much of the global economy to a sudden halt — revealing the world’s overwhelming dependence on a key cybersecurity company — and what it will take to recover…

The global outage stemmed from the latest version of CrowdStrike’s Falcon Sensor software, which was meant to make the computer systems of its clients more secure against hacking by updating the threats it defends against. A faulty code in the update, however, resulted in one of the most widespread tech outages in recent years for many companies, including banks and airports, that use Microsoft’s Windows operating system and cloud computing services.

Donald Trump let voters know he will not be pursuing a TikTok ban if he were to get elected, stating “Now [that] I’m thinking about it, I’m for TikTok, because you need competition. If you don’t have TikTok, you have Facebook and Instagram—and that’s, you know, that’s Zuckerberg.” He made this statement in an interview on Bloomberg Businessweek.

Go to Article
Excerpt from gizmodo.com

Donald Trump appears to support TikTok and doesn’t plan on banning it if he gets into office. This change of heart comes as no surprise when you consider that one of the big investors of the app is also a mega-donor for Trump, the man really needs something to give younger voters, and the platform has become a haven for pro-Trump content in recent months.

In an interview with Bloomberg Businessweek, Trump said he no longer plans on banning TikTok. His reasoning is that he doesn’t to reward his new favorite punching bag who he already threatened with prison time, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg.

“Now [that] I’m thinking about it, I’m for TikTok, because you need competition,” Trump told Bloomberg Businessweek in an interview conducted back in June and published on Tuesday. “If you don’t have TikTok, you have Facebook and Instagram—and that’s, you know, that’s Zuckerberg.”

Go to Article
Excerpt from www.courthousenews.com

A Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals panel asked California on Wednesday why a state law requiring social media platforms to disclose their policies about moderating hate speech and disinformation doesn’t amount to a violation of the First Amendment.

The three-judge panel took up X Corp.’s appeal of a federal judge’s refusal to block what California Governor Gavin Newsom in 2022 said was a first-of-its-kind social media transparency law to protect Californians from hate and disinformation spread online.

The law, AB 587, requires large social media businesses with annual revenue over $100 million to provide the state with reports about how they define and moderate content like hate speech, extremism, harassment and misinformation, as well as data on their enforcement of these policies.

 

The recently retired and now former Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Miley has stated he thinks the U.S. military will be 1/3 robotic by 2039 or sooner. He said, “Ten to fifteen years from now, my guess is a third, maybe 25% to a third of the U.S. military will be robotic,” speaking at an Axios newsletter launch event.

Go to Article
Excerpt from www.militarytimes.com

The 20th chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff believes growing artificial intelligence and unmanned technology could lead to robotic military forces in the future.

“Ten to fifteen years from now, my guess is a third, maybe 25% to a third of the U.S. military will be robotic,” said retired Army Gen. Mark Milley at an Axios event Thursday launching the publication’s Future of Defense newsletter.

He noted these robots could be commanded and controlled by AI systems.

Advancements in technology and changes in the nature of war will enable militaries worldwide to make smarter and faster decisions, Milley said.

He was careful to clarify the difference between the nature and character of war. The former, he said, involves human activity and acts of politics.

“One side is trying to impose its political will on the other by the use of organized violence,” said Milley.

He noted this aspect of war rarely changes.

The character of war, however, involves tactics, technologies, weapons systems and leader training. Milley said that while these dynamics often change, the world is currently experiencing the biggest fundamental shift in human history with the rise of AI and robotics.

He cited the transition from the Civil War musket to the rifle as a prime example of a transformation that forever altered the landscape of armed conflict.

The country that implements these technologies the quickest for military use will gain the most decisive advantages over its adversaries, Milley said.

For America to maintain its supremacy as the world’s most lethal military, Milley believes it must not only adapt quickly but also in ways that might cause seismic shifts in operations.

Milley said current U.S. policy stipulates a human must always be involved and in charge when it comes to military robots and their use of lethal munitions. He explained the current thinking is that humans possess an ethical framework for decision-making that should be prioritized above all else.

Technology doesn’t have morality, he said.

But he didn’t rule out a reality where that might change.

“You can imagine a future from a technical standpoint [where] a machine enabled by AI, a robot enabled by AI, could make its own decisions,” said Milley. “Is that something the world wants?”

Riley Ceder is an editorial fellow at Military Times, where he covers breaking news, criminal justice and human interest stories. He previously worked as an investigative practicum student at The Washington Post, where he contributed to the ongoing Abused by the Badge investigation.

A U.S. Appeals Court ruled Friday that it would temporarily halt the Biden FCC from implementing its revitalization of net neutrality rules, rules that govern how much bandwidth can and should be where. Net Neutrality was shut down by former President Donald J Trump. The revitalized net neutrality rules would have taken place July 22, 2024 had this ruling not occurred.

Go to Article
Excerpt from www.communicationstoday.co.in

A US appeals on Friday said it was temporarily putting the Federal Communications Commission’s reinstatement of landmark net neutrality rules on hold until Aug. 5 as it considers industry legal challenges.

The FCC voted in April along party lines to reassume regulatory oversight of broadband internet and reinstate open internet rules adopted in 2015 that were rescinded under then-President Donald Trump. Those rules were set to take effect on July 22 until the order from the Sixth Circuit US Court of Appeals. Reuters