Sci-Tech Futurism

Go to Article
Excerpt from news.google.com

China’s People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) has tested a new smart bomb-launching electromagnetic rail gun. According to reports, the weapon launched the bomb 9 miles (15km) into the stratosphere at Mach 5+.

However, the test did find some issues around projectile stability that sent the bomb off target. The PLAN will now conduct more research and development to rectify the issue.

According to the South China Morning Post (SCMP)the rail gun’s smart bomb projectile features a pair of gliding wings for guided descent. These wings enable the bomb to, in theory, follow a gentle curve and hit a target around 3 minutes after launch.

However, something went wrong during the test fire, and the bomb went way off its intended target.

Go to Article
Excerpt from phys.org

Former President Donald Trump says that his campaign was hacked by the Iranian government—a claim that followed news on Friday that Microsoft had evidence suggesting an Iranian hacking group had breached a presidential campaign official’s account.

The breach is the result of a “spear phishing” email sent by an individual associated with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps back in June, according to Microsoft. It was one of four examples the tech company provided of Iranian hackers penetrating campaign and election infrastructure “in an apparent effort to stir up controversy or sway voters—especially in swing states.”

Coinciding with Trump’s announcement, Politico reported over the weekend that it had received emails from an anonymous account appearing to contain what the news outlet described as “internal communications from a senior Trump campaign official.”

Go to Article
Excerpt from news.google.com

The potential for artificial intelligence (AI) humanoid robots in factories and stores is sparking debate among experts on the future of work and commerce.

While companies explore humanoid robots for tasks from assembly to customer service, opinions vary widely on their adoption rate and implications. The consensus among experts leans toward gradual integration rather than rapid revolution, with key challenges in technology development, workforce adaptation, and customer acceptance still to be overcome.

“As Henry Ford said, ‘Why is it that I always get a whole person when all I want is a pair of hands?’ This sentiment applies here too,” Ding Zhao, associate professor of mechanical engineering at Carnegie Mellon University, told PYMNTS. This skepticism highlights the ongoing debate about the most effective forms of automation in various industries.

Go to Article
Excerpt from www.army-technology.com

China has suspended talks with the United States on arms control and non-proliferation consultations, with China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs blaming Washington for continuing to engage in defence sales to Taiwan, which Beijing regards as a rogue province.

In an article published on the website of China’s Ministry of National Defense (MND) on 17 July, citing state-run news outlet CGTN, it was revealed that China had “decided to suspend talks with the United States” on holding a new round of consultations over arms control and non-proliferation.

The responsibility for the suspension “lies squarely on the US side”, said Lin Jian, a spokesperson for China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, according to the MND article.

Go to Article
Excerpt from www.semafor.com

The comparison between AI weapons and the development of the atomic bomb has become a “refrain” in the industry, The Guardian noted, adding that the reference can be interpreted as hailing the beginning of a peaceful American-led hegemony, or as an ominous prediction of destruction. \While the tech isn’t advanced enough to be involved in higher strategic decision-making, that may soon change, and in turn, inadvertently or overtly escalate conflicts, and even cause “flash wars” analogous to flash market crashes, The Atlantic argued. Key concerns include the ability of the tech to distinguish military from civilian targets, and who bears responsibility if an AI misfires.

The recently retired and now former Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Miley has stated he thinks the U.S. military will be 1/3 robotic by 2039 or sooner. He said, “Ten to fifteen years from now, my guess is a third, maybe 25% to a third of the U.S. military will be robotic,” speaking at an Axios newsletter launch event.

Go to Article
Excerpt from www.militarytimes.com

The 20th chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff believes growing artificial intelligence and unmanned technology could lead to robotic military forces in the future.

“Ten to fifteen years from now, my guess is a third, maybe 25% to a third of the U.S. military will be robotic,” said retired Army Gen. Mark Milley at an Axios event Thursday launching the publication’s Future of Defense newsletter.

He noted these robots could be commanded and controlled by AI systems.

Advancements in technology and changes in the nature of war will enable militaries worldwide to make smarter and faster decisions, Milley said.

He was careful to clarify the difference between the nature and character of war. The former, he said, involves human activity and acts of politics.

“One side is trying to impose its political will on the other by the use of organized violence,” said Milley.

He noted this aspect of war rarely changes.

The character of war, however, involves tactics, technologies, weapons systems and leader training. Milley said that while these dynamics often change, the world is currently experiencing the biggest fundamental shift in human history with the rise of AI and robotics.

He cited the transition from the Civil War musket to the rifle as a prime example of a transformation that forever altered the landscape of armed conflict.

The country that implements these technologies the quickest for military use will gain the most decisive advantages over its adversaries, Milley said.

For America to maintain its supremacy as the world’s most lethal military, Milley believes it must not only adapt quickly but also in ways that might cause seismic shifts in operations.

Milley said current U.S. policy stipulates a human must always be involved and in charge when it comes to military robots and their use of lethal munitions. He explained the current thinking is that humans possess an ethical framework for decision-making that should be prioritized above all else.

Technology doesn’t have morality, he said.

But he didn’t rule out a reality where that might change.

“You can imagine a future from a technical standpoint [where] a machine enabled by AI, a robot enabled by AI, could make its own decisions,” said Milley. “Is that something the world wants?”

Riley Ceder is an editorial fellow at Military Times, where he covers breaking news, criminal justice and human interest stories. He previously worked as an investigative practicum student at The Washington Post, where he contributed to the ongoing Abused by the Badge investigation.

Go to Article
Excerpt from www.eletimes.com

Researchers at Penn State have developed a new 3D-printed material designed to advance soft robotics, skin-integrated electronics, and biomedical devices. This material is soft, stretchable, and self-assembled, overcoming many limitations of previous fabrication methods, such as lower conductivity and device failure. According to Tao Zhou, an assistant professor at Penn State, the challenge of developing highly conductive, stretchable conductors has persisted for nearly a decade. While liquid metal-based conductors offered a solution, they required secondary activation methods—like stretching or laser activation—which complicated fabrication and risked device failure.

Go to Article
Excerpt from www.discovermagazine.com

 

One of the great fears of modern times is that generative AI systems are giving malicious actors unprecedented power to lie, manipulate and steal on a scale previously unimaginable and that this will undermine our systems of trust, democracy and society.

Examples abound of from election interference to the mass-production of fake reviews. Indeed, it’s easy to imagine that these are just a small fraction of the insidious endeavor currently undermining our way of life.

The truth is more nuanced of course but it raises the broader question of how to better understand these malicious AI techniques, where they are being applied, by whom, on what scale and for what purpose.