x14 MI Advisor Reports

Trump’s Congo Crisis Looming: The Rise of the New Keiretsu

pgnewser March 21, 2025

By Michael A. Cessna, Military Affairs Correspondent

Originally published March 14, 2025 for our Mid-Month Issue of Mindful Intelligence Advisor.  Subscribe to get semi-monthly issues.

“If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world.” – J.R.R. Tolkien

INTRODUCTION

Something is stirring in Central Africa. A new power may be rising, one that could upset both world markets and world security, in a realm where Western governments cannot operate, for strategic, tactical, and “optical” reasons.

Upon Donald Trump’s ascension to power, he swiftly engaged in upending the rancid underbelly of the “Deep State.” Trump has become the now-hardened politician – a man openly looking for payback for the last four years of viciously deranged invective inflicted upon him and his family.

Yet even in that turmoil, another tempest churns, this one in Africa. The already-embattled President now faces a set of potential economic and foreign policy disasters left to fester by his predecessors.

In brief: Trump and the United States may be facing a mortal economic threat. How he weathers this minefield will almost certainly chart the course of the next few decades.

A. THE CURRENT SITUATION

Late last year, fighting suddenly surged in the Democratic Republic of the Congo’s (DRC) North Kivu Province, as the M23 rebel group – displaying a previously unseen level of competence, equipment, and training – stormed into the remote province with a focused intensity not seen in the region in at least twenty years.

By the waning days of January, M23 rebels had smashed DRC forces in the area and captured the major city of Goma on the 25th. This also resulted in M23’s capture of nearly three hundred mercenaries, mostly from Romania – a capture of mercenaries on a scale not seen since the 1960s – who were eventually repatriated without too much trouble.

Also laid bare, was the open support of the M23 rebels by the nation of Rwanda. With Rwanda’s open support to M23, including deploying actual Rwandan Army troops on the ground in North Kivu, no one is taking Rwandan denials of direct involvement with any seriousness.

Since the genocide of the 1990s, Rwanda – led by its President, Paul Kagame – has remade itself into an economic power in the region, becoming one of the strongest economies in Central Africa, if not the entire continent. At the same time, Rwanda has rebuilt its military into a force to be both envied and feared.

Rwandan forces have taken the lead in the last ten years with the United Nation’s peacekeeping efforts throughout the world but especially in Africa, where it was Rwandan troops who helped to stabilize the Cabo Delgado insurgency in Mozambique.

Now, however, the tiger ostensibly built for peace seems rather to be devouring the steak that is the disorganized and perpetually impoverished region of the eastern Congo.

But they are not doing so alone.

B. CENTRAL AFRICA

Central Africa is defined as that region around the “Great Lakes” – comprised of Lakes Victoria, Tanganyika, Malawi, Turkana, Albert, Kivu, and Edward. It is one of the most mineral rich regions on Earth. Yet, it is also one the most grindingly poor regions, economically speaking.

For the most part, this is a consequence of both climate-driven diseases, a chaotic legacy of randomly drawn colonial borders, Africa’s terrible river systems, and the realpolitik of corporations and nations liberally spreading money and weapons to all takers in trade for the real gold of the modern world: rare earths.

It turns out “rare earth metals” are at the heart of the bloody history of the region. The mining combines of the mid- to late-twentieth century were concerned about minerals like iron, copper and uranium, in addition to the more mundane gold and diamonds.

With the rise of the high-tech computer industries that began in the 1980s, these operations refocused on crucial – and highly exotic – minerals like coltan, cobalt and lithium, among many others. From handheld smartphones to lithium-ion batteries, these exotic materials are the foundations of the modern world, at least in the West.

This mineral wealth, however, comes at a high cost.

The human rights abuses involved in how minerals are extracted in the Congo Basin are legendary. “Slavery” is simply too weak a word to describe the very-real situation on the ground. Rwanda (and more importantly, Uganda) has been happy to maintain that status quo, despite their public positions.

This brings us to the “silent partner” in the fighting: Uganda.

C. PROTO-RWANDA (UGANDA) REENTERS THE CHAT

Uganda’s journey from the devastation of Idi Amin’s rule to its current position as a regional power presents a compelling parallel to Rwanda’s more recent transformation, establishing a pattern that might be termed the “East African recovery model.”

  1. AFTER THE COLLAPSE – Following the overthrow of Amin in 1979 and the subsequent turbulent Milton Obote period, Uganda faced catastrophic economic collapse, with GDP having fallen by 40% and infrastructure in ruins. When Yoweri Museveni’s National Resistance Movement seized power in 1986, the country stood as a textbook failed state.

Museveni’s initial approach prioritized stability through a combination of military consolidation and pragmatic economic liberalization. By establishing firm control over the security apparatus, while simultaneously courting Western donors and international financial institutions, Uganda secured the breathing room needed for recovery.

  1. THE NEXT STAGE, THE DUAL TRACK APPROACH – The 1990s saw Uganda adopt structural adjustment programs that, while controversial, helped stabilize inflation and establish the foundations for growth, a situation that continues today.

This dual-track approach of internal security control paired with external economic engagement would later become a blueprint for Paul Kagame in post-genocide Rwanda.

Uganda’s economic recovery was remarkable in context. From 1992 to 2010, GDP growth averaged 7% annually, poverty rates declined from 56% to approximately 25%, and infrastructure – particularly in Kampala – saw significant improvements.

The government cultivated strong relationships with both Western donors and, increasingly, Chinese investors, playing potential partners against each other to maximize development assistance while minimizing political concessions.

This economic revival occurred alongside careful management of internal political dynamics. Museveni maintained power through a hybrid system that combined democratic formalities with authoritarian practices.

The government tolerated limited opposition, permitted a relatively free press, and held regular elections while ensuring none of these threatened central control. This approach of “managed democracy” created sufficient political stability for economic development while preventing the emergence of serious challengers to the regime – another model later adopted by Rwanda.

  1. BECOMING AN INFLUENCER – Uganda’s approach to regional security similarly presaged Rwanda’s later strategies. Museveni used both conventional military power and proxy forces to secure Uganda’s interests in neighboring countries, most notably in eastern DRC during the First and Second Congo Wars.

This now appears to be a pattern apparently repeating itself in the open in South Sudan as of the 11th of March. These interventions, while moderately justifiable on security grounds, also secured access to valuable mineral resources that supplemented the formal economy.

D. BECOMING KEIRETSU

  1. RWANDA EMERGES – The parallels between Rwanda’s subsequent development and Uganda’s are striking. Both countries emerged from catastrophic violence to achieve notable economic growth under strongman leadership. Both maintained tight internal security control while presenting a reform-oriented face to international donors.

Both developed sophisticated strategies for regional power projection that blended formal and informal mechanisms. And both cultivated international partners across ideological lines, pragmatically engaging with Western democracies, China, and regional organizations simultaneously.

Where the two models diverge is in scale and efficiency. Rwanda, under Kagame, has implemented a more disciplined and centralized version of the Ugandan model, achieving greater administrative effectiveness and lower corruption.

While Uganda pioneered the approach of combining authoritarian stability with economic liberalization, Rwanda has refined it into a more coherent system that has delivered more consistent results, particularly in public service delivery and economic planning.

  1. THE RARE EARTH ALLURE – As both countries now eye the mineral wealth of eastern DRC, Uganda stands as both predecessor and partner, backed up by “boots on the ground,” to Rwanda’s ambitions – a prototype that demonstrated the possibility of post-conflict transformation while establishing many of the regional dynamics that continue to shape East Africa’s security landscape.
  2. THE RAINBOW CRISIS – However, the foregoing is complicated by the LGBT+ question. Uganda has stated, pointedly and repeatedly, its hard-line stance against homosexuality. In this, Uganda pointedly rejected U.S.-led calls to repeal its hardcore stance against homosexuality, despite sanctions being imposed upon the country for its stance.

In this, lays the genesis of the current danger: Using Rwanda to take the lead, Ugandan leader Yoweri Museveni seems to be partnering with Paul Kagame to grind down on the West, by establishing a hard lock on controlling the Central African rare earths market.

In effect, Rwanda and Uganda are about to establish a kind of “sovereign keiretsu” in Africa’s Central Lakes region.

THE “PROMISING” FUTURE OF THE NEW KEIRETSU

  1. WHAT IS A KEIRETSU? – In the original Japanese, a “keiretsu” is a series of interlocking corporate relationships where the individual companies are usually unconnected – and not competing against each other – in the wider market.

While a keiretsu is typically corporate in nature, what is emerging in Central Africa is a keiretsu formed by sovereign states – not an open series of treaties, but an “understanding” between leaders on how to act in concert, for both strategic and business purposes.

  1. GHOST ALLIANCE – Rwanda and Uganda’s potential formation of a coordinated “ghost” economic-military alliance to dominate rare earth elements (REEs) in Central Africa represents a significant evolution in resource geopolitics with far-reaching implications. This emerging dynamic centers on the eastern region of the DRC, where Rwanda has already leveraged its support of its M23 rebel proxy group to secure influence over North Kivu’s vast mineral-rich territories.

The strategic calculus behind such a partnership lies in combining Rwanda’s established proxy networks and military effectiveness with Uganda’s greater economic infrastructure and international connections. Both nations possess experienced militaries with regional projection capabilities and histories of involvement in DRC’s resource extraction.

Their potential “keiretsu” arrangement would create a more formalized structure for resource extraction, processing, and export while maintaining plausible deniability regarding direct territorial control.

  1. M23 REBEL GROUP – The military proxy the alliance could use centers on the M23 rebel group, which reemerged in 2021 after nearly a decade of relative inactivity. Multiple UN reports have documented Rwandan direct support, including provision of advanced weapons, command elements, and territorial sanctuary.

M23’s operations have specifically focused on mineral-rich territories in North Kivu province, suggesting resource acquisition as a primary objective rather than broader political aims. Uganda’s military could provide complementary capabilities, particularly in logistics and broader territorial control.

  1. THE EASTERN DRC – The eastern DRC contains significant deposits of tantalum, cobalt, coltan, and other critical minerals essential for advanced technology manufacturing. While precise geological surveys remain incomplete due to ongoing instability, the region holds an estimated 70% of the world’s coltan and substantial reserves of other rare earths. These deposits have historically been exploited through artisanal mining without comprehensive geological mapping, suggesting their true value may exceed current estimates.
  2. THE RARE EARTH PRIZE – The economic implications extend far beyond Central Africa. The global rare earths market, currently dominated by China (which controls approximately 85% of processing capacity), has become increasingly strategic as nations seek supply chain security for critical technologies.

A Rwanda-Uganda alliance could position itself as an alternative supply source for Western markets eager to diversify away from Chinese dependence. However, unlike Australia or Canada’s developing rare earth sectors, this Central African supply would come with significant ethical complications.

For Rwanda’s President Kagame, this strategy represents a potential economic transformation for his landlocked nation. Rwanda’s economy, while showing impressive growth rates, lacks natural resources and remains vulnerable to international aid fluctuations.

Control over DRC’s mineral wealth would provide a sustainable revenue stream independent of Western donor priorities. Uganda’s President Museveni similarly faces economic pressure to develop new growth engines as his country struggles with debt and needs to capitalize on recent oil discoveries.

PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS

International reactions have been mixed, confused, and often contradictory. Western nations have issued diplomatic condemnations while continuing economic partnerships with both countries. China has maintained its own resource extraction agreements with DRC’s central government while pragmatically engaging with Rwanda.

The African Union and regional bodies like the East African Community have initiated peace processes that have yet to address the fundamental resource competition driving the conflict.

The broader geopolitical implications are potentially transformative for global technology supply chains. Western technology manufacturers, from defense contractors to consumer electronics companies, face increasing pressure to secure non-Chinese rare earth supplies while also adhering to conflicting mineral regulations.

A Rwanda-Uganda alliance could position itself as a “managed” source of these materials – more formalized than current conflict mineral networks but without the environmental and labor standards of Western producers.

For DRC and its citizens, the stakes are existential. The country has lost an estimated $4-8 billion annually to illicit resource extraction for decades, funds that could transform its development trajectory. The environmental consequences have been similarly severe, with unregulated mining causing widespread deforestation and water contamination.

This emerging resource competition represents the evolution of what some analysts have termed “hybrid resource colonialism” – utilizing proxy forces and economic pressure rather than direct occupation to secure vital materials.

As global demand for rare earths continues to grow with the expansion of renewable energy and advanced computing, the strategic value of controlling these resources will only increase, potentially cementing a new form of resource competition in one of Africa’s most volatile regions.

The question, however, is “Why?” These are highly aggressive moves for both countries to take. The answer is painfully simple.

Sub-Saharan Africa is fed up with the patronizing and moralizing attitude of Western countries – including the United States – who need their natural resources, but who insist on trying to moralize on how the African states’ attitudes need to conform to what the Western countries want…and when moralizing doesn’t work, resorting to bribery to rig elections.

While this sort of thing has worked in the past, the tables began to turn about ten years ago. Starting in the Sahel region, a series of coups d’états eventually led to the near-total withdrawal of France from its long-held spheres of colonial influence.

Yoweri Museveni – long a very keen observer of the West – smelled weakness, as did Paul Kagame…and what both men realized, was that this strategy could be adapted for their own use.

One of the glaring revelations exposed by the 2023 coup in Niger, was that Western states can no longer simply “invade” most Sub-Saharan countries. This is a result of not only strategic military weakness, but it also comes from the hard fact that no Western government can survive the image of mostly white military forces attacking Black African nations.

Certainly, Western states can send in “military assistance teams” to try and aid a nation’s military, and can usually send in small, temporary forces to rescue embassy staff when a nation “goes pear-shaped.”

But they cannot invade and conquer a Black nation, anymore, as the Western states’ own electorates absolutely will not tolerate such an action. This is the real calculus factor that both Museveni and Kagame understand. Their “unofficially official” alliance can grab certain swaths of terrain, take control of resource extraction in those areas – and Western states will have to comply.

In the case of rare earths, the West has no choice but to bend the knee: With Communist China directly supplying some 70% of the world’s supply of these minerals, and processing some 90% of global output – without which, most modern electronics technology cannot function – Western states absolutely need other sources…and the West’s old model of paternalistic attitudes to the non-Chinese regions of the world who supply rare earths have handed leaders like Museveni and Kagame all the moral justification they require.

Prices in tech are about to rise significantly, and there is very little that the new administration can do about it.

FURTHER RESOURCES

The Congo: From Leopold to Kabila: A People’s History – Georges Nzongola-Nataja

Rwanda: History and Hope – Margee M. Ensign and William E. Bertrand

Rwanda History: Learn About the Tragic Consequence of Rwanda – Alexander Fricks

The History of Uganda: From Ancient Legends to Modern Wonders – Angie Ngabo-Baker

The First Address: Trump Serves the New World Order It’s Death Notice

pgnewser March 21, 2025

By Bill Collier, Publisher

Originally published March 14, 2025 for our Mid-Month Issue of Mindful Intelligence Advisor.  Subscribe to get semi-monthly issues.

“… I look at the Democrats in front of me, and I realize there is absolutely nothing I can say to make them happy or to make them stand or smile or applaud. Nothing I can do. I could find a cure to the most devastating disease – a disease that would wipe out entire nations or announce the answers to the greatest economy in history or the stoppage of crime to the lowest levels ever recorded, and these people sitting right here will not clap, will not stand, and certainly will not cheer for these astronomical achievements. They won’t do it no matter what.” –President Donald J Trump, from his 5th joint sessions address

INTRODUCTION

For our older readers, there will be a strong reaction to the phrase “New World Order” that, for many, signifies a blatant betrayal of American national sovereignty in favor of a corrupt ruling class in the political and corporate world. When the first Bush invoked those words, Republicans and Democrats both pursued what amounted to an anti-American agenda that weakened our economy, our well-being, and, of course, our country’s independence.

The many wars we fought proved to be outlandish failures, and the fears invoked to justify them often proved to be exaggerations or lies. The “War On Terror” justified the surveillance state and shocking violations of the Bill of Rights that still persist (including the further empowering of a FISA court that would be politically weaponized against our current President through the Orwellian-termed act, “The Patriot Act”).

In many ways, both the things Trump said in this speech and that the Democratic Party said in response with their desperate, uncivil and unprofessional behavior felt more like a raucous briefing from the frontline of a revolution against that very same world disorder of their “rules based international order” which is far worse than we could have imagined. It was as if Trump was on the front, proclaiming the demise of the enemy before him who were shooting back at him as he spoke. 

While Democrats fumed with their truthless little paddles and outbursts, Trump detailed blow after blow, thanks to DOGE and administrative efforts to root out fraud and abuse. We are finding that BILLIONS of taxpayer dollars went into the treasury and out in an intentionally underhanded way to funnel our money into the hands of NWO revolutionary organizations, almost all being identified as on the left. NWO moles within the government illegally facilitated this and covered it up for decades, while making themselves rich.

The left versus right divide has some relevance, but the deeper delineation could be seen as being more authoritarian versus less and being more for local and private autonomy from the state versus wanting a global hegemonic power that essentially dictates to every person how to live. It is simply authoritarianism versus freedomism and localist decentralization versus global hegemonic centralization.

A. THE TENOR

Many will detail the elements of the speech, blow by blow, but the tenor of the speech was simple: Trump and his team are going to dismantle the funding and organizational superstructure of the “New World Order,” and as for the “rules based international order,” it is toast. This also includes Trump’s team, who identified the illegal funneling of tax dollars to fund Democratic and establishment GOP candidates as well as their causes, which are not authorized by Congress and are therefore fraudulent and illegal.

B.  THE MIXED REGIME STRATEGY

The last almost 40 years at least have been a story of the NWO crowd trying to basically transform this country into a “mixed regime.”

A mixed regime is a hybrid of authoritarianism and democracy; basically, the people have limited choices as per the establishment’s rules (see Romania and how a candidate was disqualified from running). The Germans justify their own authoritarianism by pretending they are creating a firewall for democracy by excluding millions of voters from choosing a different path than the NWO crowd desires Germany to take.

To facilitate a mixed regime system in the U.S., the NWO crowd’s entertainment, news, education, and web industry all suppressed dissent from “the message,” which was set from the top and center by the likes of the Soros family and the top leaders of the Uniparty establishment.

Their brief was to press every person into service for their benefit and enrichment, suppress dissent or truth to keep everyone in line, and punish or cancel those who refused to bow. 

Their efforts against Trump and his supporters have been totalitarian in spirit and illegal in action. Their goal was to kill Trump, probably because he knows it. He also seems to have a good bead on who and what they really are: corrupt people led by doctrines of hell whose every belief is essentially an analog for demons. The lawfare and Judgefare waged through corrupt courts with corrupt lawyers (all deserving of serious prison time) have failed in their aim.

We, the Editor Paul Gordon Collier and myself, have a dear friend, Andy Badolato, who was, in our opinion, a victim of this lawfare: he lost everything and served prison time for something I personally believe was a setup, which is a very long story we might one day share here.

The point is that the NWO crowd went after thousands of people, including my friend Andy, for spurious reasons and under the flimsiest of technicalities, while they themselves were wantonly breaking laws in open defiance of the Bill of Rights. This has all been done ONLY to enrich themselves and grow their powers at the expense of your rights and well-being. 

All that failed; Trump is in charge, and he now has access to the proof of their decades-long criminal and treasonous conspiracies against these United States of America.

C. THE END OF “RULES-BASED?”

The fear and rage, the nonsensical claims of being “literally Hitler,” are all predictable as Team Trump gores every sacred cow of the left, while, through DOGE, Team Trump is stripping the theft of hundreds of billions of dollars from the NWO, tax-payer-sponsored, crowd.

The NWO crowd shakes in fear as they speak of their “rules-based international order” as if it is sacred and holy. We Americans believe in “Rule of Law,” that is, in using the constitutional guidelines to bind government power, but “Rules-based” is really globalist limitations placed on other countries’ foreign policies to assure that the NWO, the “Global Order” stays firmly entrenched in power, to the detriment of the sovereignty of the nations captured by these perverse, anti-sovereign-state standards.

Trump is discarding it, even making fun of it, and this speech was no different. He destroyed their fake ethics and moral superiority complexes with brutal truth: every country who screws the USA over will be punished in some way and our only friends are those who show themselves friendly.

The EU and NATO countries have long enjoyed us paying to defend them with our own forces while both use NWO moles to funnel money to their organizations. They do this under the guise of being the moral betters of America. Trump’s speech was stark in how he discarded their pretend alliances and loyalty, as if NATO’s needs and wants come before America’s interests.

It is surprising that Trump didn’t invoke George Washington, who spoke against permanent entangling alliances. His concern seems to have been that Americans could be compelled to support things that go against our interests to please our allies.

But while Trump didn’t invoke Washington, his speech was certainly more akin to what Washington would have said than any President since, well, perhaps since Washington himself. 

The NWO crowd are all trembling in fear, but still are not vanquished and are still capable of inflicting harm on their enemies, especially as Trump, Musk, JD Vance, RFK Jr, Pam Bondi, and the rest of Trump’s growing army continues its own merciless onslaught.

The NWO crowd, including the leaders and the people who have bought into the fake public “religion” of the New World Order, are all enraged and on the war path.

D. THE FAILED CULTURE OF TOTALITARIANS ON DISPLAY

What we saw in Trump’s speech, in combination with the numerous low-class disruptions by the DNC, was the agony of totalitarians who failed in their ultimate goals and are now watching decades of subversive work to destroy our Constitution go down in flames.

This continues on as DOGE and the new leadership simply audit for fraud and abuse. The NWO crowd, including groups like their paid pro-abortion, wokist lunacy, climate change hoaxers, and pro Hamas terrorists (who remain protected by Soros DAs still refusing to prosecute them), are apoplectic.

For decades, they patiently labored and plotted, plotted and labored before they finally succeeded in subverting every institution, including government at all levels. More importantly, this also includes the means of cultural production, the press, the media, education, etc. Now, things are turning against them, and they’re turning against them, as Donald Trump would say, “Bigly!”

Trump’s tone and method were far from conventional, and he has consistently been an iconoclast to the “Federal culture” that permeates both those inside government and those whose work involves anything political.

Every group of people has some sort of cultural norms and standards, including the government and everyone engaging in politics. The Federal culture that once dominated everyone’s thinking and rules of conduct has been questioned and may be changing.

Those changes will optimally make it harder for NWO subversives to ever regain their shadow-state hijacking of Federal power and wealth, effectively turning this country into an NWO satellite of some international entity like the WEF or the UN.

E. THE DECORUM DILEMA THAT IS NOT A DILEMA AT ALL

Trump’s decorum was and will remain rather shocking at times. When I was the public face for a newspaper and ranted on social media, my partners asked if I was a professional newspaper publisher or an angry blogger. While at the time I was offended, it stuck with me, and I came to see that they were right and that decorum matters.

But Trump doesn’t have decorum like I think a President should. 

Why does Trump have a massive loyal following when he seems to lack the decorum one thinks is necessary to create such a loyal following? The answer is based on the truth that every task in every place and time must be suited in its design, functions, and ergonomics both to the task and to the person or people who will use it.

Trump fits millions of people who needed to have someone who was truly and demonstrably disloyal to the establishment, his lack of conventional decorum being a most visible sign. The work of dismantling as much of the NWO infrastructure as possible that has burrowed itself into the Federal government requires a tool, a President in this case, who has no love for the “New World Order” and its inhumane agendas. 

Thus, Trump fits the American voters who desire a forward advancement of freedom after decades of the NWO’s war on freedom from within our own government by corrupt people whose soul has been sold, figuratively speaking.

While Trump’s slogan is “Make America Great Again,” his agenda, if it succeeds, will advance freedom and economic opportunities for every person and people group and every household and neighborhood as has never been seen before. His slogan could have been, “Advance Freedom and Abundance for ALL Americans!”

F. RESTORING AMERICA’S SPIRIT

MAGA, in my mind, isn’t really about restoring America to the past. The idea is more about restoring the spirit of America that overcame prejudice and many flaws and sins, including the Trail of Tears. Through all these shortcomings and sins, we can see an arc of history bending not only toward justice, but toward a life of freedom and abundance being accessible to every American who works for it, AND with public help for those who cannot work or find work. 

MAGA doesn’t want America to go back and repeat the same sins and mistakes. What is driving many in this movement, even subconsciously, is the desire to restore America’s moral and legal justifications for its existence.

The idea is to lift again the fallen mantle of America’s God-given scroll of destiny and purpose, which is the arc of our history ever-bending towards this vision of freedom and abundance for all Americans. The closer we walk towards that future the further we walk from the patterns of our past (and even current) mistakes, sins, and bad ideas.

The spirit of what President Trump said (which also represents what I see as the spirit of MAGA), is to restore America’s true manifest destiny as a commonwealth of freedom. The spirit of America is to be the cradle of freedom civilizations that will purge the alien and seditious NWO conspirators from within that waged war on freedom and prosperity every day.

Blow after blow fell from Trump’s mouth as horrified NWO minions gasped from within but outwardly, dishonestly, they aped righteous anger over his preachments!

NO MORE illegal aliens.

NO MORE election fraud.

NO MORE grooming kids to make them mentally ill with evil doctrines.

NO MORE taxpayer dollars going to organizations who are dedicated to destroying our Constitutional Union of free and sovereign states and diverse national people groups.

NO MORE U.S. money to international organizations who are working to bring the NWO agenda to many lands as part of a global empire of tyranny. 

Over and over, Trump gored their ox and lifted the hope of millions of Americans who truly believe Trump is one of, if not the most, populist Presidents who is inspired and driven by his love for the people.

The fact he speaks their language and genuinely seems to try and deliver on his promises makes people feel he represents THEIR interests and not the interests of the globalist, NWO elites.

History will, in time, tell if indeed Trump lives up to this narrative, but for now it is a narrative many believe and which Trump seems to be basing his Presidency on, something that almost no President has ever done.

G. ONLY TRUMP WILL DO?

It has been said that the world rarely needs a General George S. Patton, but when the need is there, only a Patton will do. Trump’s outlandishness, bragging, and even rudeness seen in this speech certainly grates on people who wish for decorum, but this, along with his “exaggerations” (which his followers seem to receive as rhetorical flourish and “creative license,” not facts), is probably exactly what is needed at this time.

While Trump didn’t use the terms “New World Order,” “NWO Crowd,” or “NWO establishment,” and neither do the bad guys we call NWO minions or ruling class, he yet may lay waste to their kingdom.

His words are usually met with actions, unless they are part of negotiations meant to make his negotiating position stronger. Thus, when he says he will root out the illegal use of our country’s tax revenues for purposes not intended by Congress (in open defiance of America’s constitutionally-based Rule of Law), he means it.

So far, the NWO crowd can only shake and gyrate with nonsensical rhetoric in desperation to stop this assault on their source of power and wealth, embezzling tax revenues from the governments of the world.

H. THE NWO PRESS

The narrative used to be that uber-rich billionaires spent their money to help their preferred candidates and policies “win” by any means necessary, including mass information indoctrination and election fraud.

The fact the media are often running a deficit made people ask why they were still in business and who was funding them. The fact many corporations enact unpopular policies, lose customers, and stay in business had people asking who was bankrolling them.

The idea here was that every major corporation, as well as every educational, news, information, and entertainment institution, and the courts, as well as the  bureaucracy, could enact policies and produce content meant to deceive and control the masses, turning them into NWO minions or mindless atomized drones.

These institutions would at times lose popularity and support, but we all assumed these billionaires at the top of the NWO cabal sustained the private institutions while our tax dollars went to the government. It turns out these institutions are all funded by tax dollars.

These “billionaire moles” eventually became the super majority within the bureaucracy. They worked as liaisons with private entities (corporations) to enable the government to use private entities to do things to you that otherwise would be illegal for government to do, like restricting your free expression. They bribed them with your money to attack your rights.

At this point, though, the line between the state and the state-favored corporation may be gone altogether, though it appears Trump to ends at least one corpostate. Let us hope he isn’t replacing it with another one.

The New York Times remains afloat after decades of fake journalism meant to mask their rancid NWO political agenda and their hatred of liberty, and even decency. That paper should have failed. But Federal money saved it from financial disaster. The NWO Press are all facing major financial woes because Soros types didn’t use their own money to fund them; they stole it from the taxpayers, funneled through layers of NGOs and other entities until Soros himself wrote the check and made himself a kingmaker in the NWO establishment. 

Trump has eviscerated the NWO FakePress in many ways, and they continue their libelous attacks on him and his team, but when Trump spoke about the abuse of tax dollars from within the government by moles working with these billionaires, he was sounding the death knell on their subversive insurrection from within our government by traitors.

The NWO crowd didn’t show any respect for the young man who was made an honorary Secret Service agent or the families who lost loved ones to illegal alien killers. While many think this was heartless of them, it is probably their frozen state of fear and rage.

When you are in such a state, it’s hard to engage in rationality, let alone behave in a civil manner with those you perceive and maybe know are dismantling a major aspect of your power and a major source of your wealth. 

SUMMARY

The speech was a tour de force of the Trump team’s war on the NWO itself, which is both a domestic and international battle. Our founder, Don McAlvany, knew (and still knows) about the NWO. Indeed, at one time, we were both swimming in the same water (as it were) as I was working with some of the same people and organizations that he was.

It is incredible for older people who have lived for so long under this self-hating regime (which may have started with the first Bush) to see a time when the “NWO” was so challenged at the heart of its power.

The charge is being led by an imperfect man with many flaws and lack of decorum, a man who goes so hard against what we always called the New World Order, using Bush’s own confession that such a thing existed. Not only is he challenging the NWO,  he’s WINNING significant victories.

We have never seen the NWO crowd on their back foot, in defense, and even disarray, as now they seem to be. This speech will be remembered as being symbolic of real achievements, as well as being the clarion call to unite against our common foe, the NWO.

Whatever they call themselves or others call them, veterans of this war on freedom often call them the New World Order. What Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum are pushing is still the same NWO agenda first publicized by George Bush the First. 

What began in 1989 when the first Bush spoke of a kinder, gentler nation and a New World Order (all nice-sounding words that were a cover for their war AGAINST freedom) has met an existential threat in the person of Donald Trump.

Trump’s speech was salt on the wounds of the NWO crowd because, unlike most such speeches, this one was more about what the President was doing now or has already achieved than just promises and rhetoric meant to entertain.

FURTHER RESOURCES:

The Art of the Deal – Tony Schwartz, Donald Trump

Rise of the New World Order: The Culling of Man – Micha-el Thomas Hays

The Emergence and Role of Nongovernmental Organizations – Lowell J. Gretebeck

The Rise of NGO Activism – Julien Daubanes and Jean-Charles Rochet

Grooming to Death: The Left’s Scheme to Destroy the British People – Part Two, the Finish

pgnewser March 7, 2025

Originally published February 28, 2025 for our End-of-Month Issue of Mindful Intelligence Advisor.  Subscribe to get semi-monthly issues.

By Paul Gordon Collier, Editor

“All that is necessary for evil to succeed is for good men to do nothing as they must if they believe they can do nothing. There is nothing worse because the council of despair is declaration of irresponsibility; it is Pilate washing his hands.” – Edmund Burke

INTRODUCTION

Keir Starmer, the current openly Marxist, Britain-hating Prime Minister of the UK, is proving to be an existential threat to the children of Britain and to the fate of the country itself. His participation in the enabling of child rape gangs, gangs of Islamists using rape and murder as a form of political manipulation, is clear and, at this point, beyond dispute.

His continued hatred for the British people and their way of life can be seen in how he jumps to protect Islamists from bad opinions while he continues to slander and defame the British people.

In past reports, we have exposed this man’s Marxist roots and his anti-British agenda to turn Britain into a cesspit of Islamist Marxism devoid of the white devil he imagines his own people are (despite the fact that he, too, is a white British man, but not in spirit).

The Free Press has an excellent summary of the albatross continuing to drag this man’s dystopian fantasy down:

The scandal is already reshaping British politics. It’s not just about the heinous nature of the crimes. It’s that every level of the British system is implicated in the cover-up.

Social workers were intimidated into silence. Local police ignored, excused, and even abetted pedophile rapists across dozens of cities. Senior police and Home Office officials deliberately avoided action in the name of maintaining what they called “community relations.” Local councilors and Members of Parliament rejected pleas for help from the parents of raped children. Charities, NGOs, and Labour MPs accused those who discussed the scandal of racism and Islamophobia. The media mostly ignored or downplayed the biggest story of their lifetimes. Zealous in their incuriosity, much of Britain’s media elite remained barnacled to the bubble of Westminster politics and its self-serving priorities.

They did this to defend a failed model of multiculturalism, and to avoid asking hard questions about failures of immigration policy and assimilation. They did this because they were afraid of being called racist or Islamophobic. They did this because Britain’s traditional class snobbery had fused with the new snobbery of political correctness….

What we do know is that the epicenter was the postindustrial mill towns of England’s north and Midlands, where immigrants from Pakistan and Bangladesh settled in the 1960s. White locals say the grooming and rapes began soon after…

The details are established beyond doubt in the small number of prosecutions that eventually made it to court. The suffering described in the court papers is sickening to read: The girls were drugged, beaten, sodomized, gang-raped, trafficked, and tortured.

A. BIGGER THAN STARMER

Keir Starmer is the current front-face of the grooming assault on Britain in the name of Marxism, or globalism, or whatever you want to call it. The problems existed before him and are present in both the Conservative AND Labour Parties, but he is the perpetuator of this violent assault.

From UnHerd:

The statistics behind the rape gang scandal – let’s banish the wholly inadequate word “grooming” – are staggering. For over 25 years, networks of men, predominantly from Pakistani Muslim backgrounds, abused young white girls from Yeovil to London to Glasgow. The victims’ accounts are beyond depravity, unthinkable in a supposedly advanced Western democracy.

That, of course, immediately raises a simple, shocking question: why did British police services turn a blind eye to the gang rape of tens of thousands of young girls?…

The answer, in the end, is simple. Racism, for police services from Chester to Penzance, remains the original sin. From the Scarman Report to the Macpherson Inquiry, the police have long served as Britain’s sin-eaters, devouring social problems on our behalf. As former Met Commissioner Sir Robert Mark famously wrote: “The police are the anvil on which society beats out the problems and abrasions of social inequality, racial prejudice, weak laws and ineffective legislation.”

Compared to the intentional assault on the British people by its own racist, anti-liberty government (under Conservatives OR Labour), the Normans of 1066 were tolerant, peace-loving, freedom-respecting invaders.

B. THE GROOMING

  1. 2008-2009 ROCHDALE INVESTIGATION – While Keir Starmer served in leadership in the Crown Prosecution Services (CPS), his team decided that a young victim of grooming gangs was “unreliable,” so the case was dismissed, which led to a delay in their prosecution for 3 years before a prosecutor appointed by Starmer, Nazir Afzal, finally charged and prosecuted them. This led to the conviction of 9 men.

What happened during those three years before these men were finally prosecuted? One can only believe that they continued to do what they were doing before they got caught, grooming and raping white English children as a form of jihad against the country that paid their way there and continues to pay to sustain them.

  1. ROCHDALE GROOMING REIGN – A report from 2014 on the Rochdale grooming gangs shows their sexual assaults on children were at their highest between 1997 and 2013, falling in line with Starmer’s tenure there. It’s almost as if they KNEW they would get a free ride from the anti-English Starmer (who most likely viewed the raping of English children as justice for the raping of the third world by the British Empire).
  2. STARMER’S NONCE-ENABLING INSTITUTIONALIZATION – Starmer’s opponents believe he created an institutional spirit in CPS that stigmatized any notion of going after Muslim immigrants even if they KNEW (which this writer believes they DID KNOW) the grooming gangs were assaulting children. After all, these children were the children of the white devil who raped the world.

Professor Alexis Jay’s 2022 report on grooming gangs states that the only serious prosecutions of grooming gangs under Starmer were a result of a massive public pushback. Wherever cases were not publicly covered, Starmer’s child-rape-enabling prosecutors continued to sit on their hands.

Starmer’s creation of a pedo-enabling culture and his refusal to change led to the rape of hundreds more children, children Starmer probably views not as victims but as criminals being rightly punished.

C. THE SPIRIT OF GROOMING IN STARMER’S WORLDVIEW

  1. GROOMING FOR MARXISM IN THEORY – The Marxist left comes from a place where, inherently, they are predisposed to dispose of children and subject them to sexual assault. This spirit emerges from their claim that “systemic racism” is the existential threat to humanity that must be eradicated, by any means necessary, if humanity is to hope to survive. That systemic racism was created by the white devil, who also created heteronormativity, the sexual binary, parents, mother, father, and even the age of consent (ED.NOTE: In America, this list includes the Constitution, ESPECIALLY the Bill of Rights).

In order to rid the world of the white devil’s institutions, it’s not enough to change the laws, the old institutions must die. Children, for instance, must be encouraged to question their sexuality and gender, to BREAK the heteronormative frame and the gender binary construct. This is essential to their worldview, which is that the white devil led humanity astray, led humanity away from its real good, and the only way to return to the real good is to eliminate every institution the white devil created.

The Marxist left doesn’t merely encourage sexual grooming, they practically demand it. Their claim is that children who fit outside the sexual and gender norm will kill themselves unless government agents FORCE CHILDREN to question their sexuality and gender, and the white devil will win, because he uses heteronormativity and the sexual binary to oppress minorities.

In this cultural reality, sacrificing the children of the white devils on the altar of sexual assault is hardly offensive to an ideology that DEMANDS child sex grooming, never mind the fact that the key “founders” of the current iteration of Marxism were open advocates of pedophilia (which we covered in an earlier MIA report).

Destroying the majority for the good of the minority is the far nobler goal. Sure, there may be suffering here or there, and SOME children might be innocent, but overall, society as a whole will only grow closer to human perfection if we destroy the constructs the white devil created and replace them with our own (never mind what they are, to question them is to affirm you’re part of the oppressive majority, the white devil).

  1. THE UK FACE OF GROOMING FOR MARXISM – Keir Starmer is the poster child for that spirit. Under his watch as a lead prosecutor, Keir Starmer would enable child rape gangs across the UK to victimize more than 10,000 innocent children. His failure, willing or not, to “join the dots” across regions and across multiple victim testimonies protected child rapists and knowingly, willingly put children in danger “for the good of the whole (to end racism, which is to end the white devil, which is to end Britian itself as a construct).”

Starmer is as guilty of the child rapes and murders as the Islamist grooming gangs his office protected (and his current administration is still importing and subsidizing), whenever and wherever it could. The fact that CPS destroyed many records from his reign shows the actions of a guilty man and a guilty department.

Starmer’s defense would be that under his watch, between 2010 and 2011, there was a rise in child sex abuse cases prosecuted, but that was the result of reluctant prosecutions of cases that went public. The proof that this is true is in the fact that the number rose significantly once Starmer left. For instance, in 2016-17, the same CPS office prosecuted nearly twice as many cases as were prosecuted under Starmer’s peak prosecution year.

In other words, the insertion of child rape culture into Britain through state-sponsored “immigration” created a massive spike in child sex assault cases that Starmer’s office couldn’t completely ignore (though they would have if the public hadn’t forced their hand).

D. STARMER’S DEFENSE: KILL FREE SPEECH

Keir Starmer reveals his guilt by his best defense, a defense that seeks to lay the groundwork to criminalize any effort to call Islamists what they are: pedophile murderer-rapists running rampant across the UK on the taxpayer dime.

Elon Musk and others that claimed that Starmer knew about the rape gangs and protected them for two reasons: to curry votes with the England-hating subsidized Muslim community and to punish the English for having a world empire that, according to these deranged lunatics, did nothing but rape the lands, as well as the noble people of those lands.

In answering these accusations, Starmer said, “Those that are spreading lies and misinformation as far and wide as possible are not interested in victims, they’re interested in themselves. They are cheerleading Tommy Robinson, a man who went to prison for nearly collapsing a grooming case, a gang grooming case. These people are trying to get some kind of vicarious thrill from street violence, that people like Tommy Robinson promote.”

“Those attacking Jess Phillips, who I’m proud to call a colleague and a friend, are not protecting victims. Jess Phillips has done a thousand times more than they’ve even dreamt about when it comes to protecting victims of sexual abuse throughout her entire career. When the poison of the far right leads to serious threats to Jess Phillips and others, that, in my book, means a line has been crossed. I enjoy the cut and thrust of politics. The robust debate that we must have. But that’s got to be based on facts and truth. Not on lies.”

“Those who are so desperate for attention that they’re prepared to debase themselves and their country. So this government will get on with the job of protecting victims, including victims of sexual abuse. What I won’t tolerate is a debate based on lies and politicians jumping on the bandwagon simply to get attention. When those politicians were in government for 14 long years.”

When the British rioted in response to their own government protecting Muslim child rapists and arresting British citizens for calling the Islamists out for who they are, psychotic terrorist insurrectionists seeking to destroy Britian, Starmer called the British people “racist thugs.”

He chortled that he would “never accept the argument…that millions of people concerned about immigration are one and the same thing as people who smashed up businesses, targeted mosques, attempted to burn refugees, scrawled racist graffiti over walls, Nazi salutes at the Cenotaph, attacked NHS nurses and told people with different coloured skin, people who contribute here, people who grew up here, that they should ‘go home.’”

Never mind that the Nazi salute accusation was an intentional lie intended to stir up more violence against the British people by fellow leftist Brits and the Islamist psychopaths the left uses in its fight against human liberty.

He concluded in his racist, terrorist speech, “I will never let a minority of violent, racist thugs terrorise our communities.” He said that sentence despite the fact that he continues to allow that very thing, only it’s not the British citizen that is guilty of this charge, it’s his Islamist allies, the brown shirt thugs of the left, who are guilty, along with him (because he aids and abets them).

  1. BLASPHEMY LAWS NEXT? – Even as the rape gangs continue to rape children in the UK, Keir Starmer is spending his efforts trying to “protect” the Islamist psychopaths from public scrutiny, coming out recently in favor of the possibility of blasphemy laws that would be defined by Islamists.

In November, during a PM question time, Starmer said, “November marks Islamophobia Awareness Month – last year, the UN Human Rights Council adopted a resolution condemning the desecration of religious texts, including the Koran. Despite opposition from the previous Government, acts of such mindless desecration only serve to fuel division and hatred within our society.”

The follow-up question to him was, “Will the Prime Minister commit to introducing measures to prohibit the desecration of all religious texts and the prophets of the Abrahamic religions?”

He answered by refusing to rule out blasphemy laws, then added, “Desecration is awful, and I think it should be condemned across the House. We are committed to tackling all forms of hatred and division, including Islamophobia in all its forms.”

  1. ARRESTING THE PROTESTORS, NOT THE GROOMERS – Starmer’s record on arresting political prisoners is a further stunning admission of his guilt. The side that insists it must be protected by state guns from dissent is ALWAYS the evil one. Some of the people who have been arrested were children, including an 11-year-old.

BBC, a British-hating, and U.S. taxpayer funded, Labour-Party-run, far left agit prop information terror machine, covered the chilling arrests in as positive a light as possible:

In the first case of a person going to jail for posting on social media during the disorder, Jordan Parlour, 28, of Seacroft, Leeds, received a 20-month sentence for inciting others to target a Leeds building which housed asylum seekers.

At least two others also received jail sentences for social media posts that stirred up racial hatred.

Suspended Labour councillor Ricky Jones appeared in court charged with encouraging violent disorder after he was filmed apparently telling a crowd that far-right demonstrators should have their throats cut.

6000 officers with specialist training in public order are “prepared and ready” to deal with any potential unrest over the weekend.

About 600 people have been arrested this week, with hundreds more expected in the coming days and weeks, police say, with the use of facial recognition technology fast tracking the process…

This was in response to the riots in August that happened after the government tried to protect the Islamist murderers of British children.

It should be noted that the so-called “Conservative” party arrested over 3,000 people JUST for posting online (under Theresa May), so the anti-British, pro-Islamist actions of Starmer and Labour are not exclusive to them. This might explain why Reform currently leads Labour as the Conservative Party continues to fade into oblivion (since they’ve devolved into being an extension of Labour).

PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS

The current breakdown of Britain’s parliament shows that Labour currently holds 404 out of 649 seats, meaning the chances of a no-confidence vote against Starmer to trigger an early snap election are slim to none. Labour won 34 percent of the vote to the Conservatives’ 24 percent and Reform’s 14 percent, meaning they won an almost insurmountable majority with only 1/3 of voting British citizens choosing them.

There is no minimum time for a PM to serve before the next general election. A general election is called by the Prime Minister or a No-Confidence vote. His recent actions suggest that he might not offer another election again, if his party has his way.

Seeing how badly they were doing in the polls, apparently it is legal for Labour to cancel local elections until 2026, possibly 2027, which they did ostensibly to protect local voters (or so they claimed).

The British people, what’s left of them, are facing at least four more years of complete tyranny as the Labour Party continues its efforts, with the help of the Conservative Party, to fully dismantle a liberty-bounded government and replace it with a Marxist one. Elections are not a recourse. Protests will now get you thrown in jail.

This “experiment” will end either with Britian being converted to a leftist third world hellhole or an event will occur, maybe a major terror assault the government tries to conceal, that will trigger a wholesale collapse of the government through nationwide non-compliance followed by a mass assault of 10 Downing Street in the style of the 1381 Peasant’s Revolt (only the boy king Starmer won’t be able to invoke God to save him like Richard II did).

The course for Britain is death or violent overthrow because all the non-violent bullets have been removed, in part by the Conservative Party, in full by the Labour Party.

In short, outside of a dramatic act of resistance by the liberty-minded British (what’s left of them), the UK will be successfully groomed into Marxism.

As a parting shot, let me point out that this report would land me in jail if I were subject to Starmer’s tyrannical rule.

FURTHER RESOURCES:

The New Discourses Podcast with James Lindsay, Episode 79 – Thinking Sex Series, Part 1 of 3 – New Discourses

 The Spirit of Pedophilia: Part Two – From Marx to Current Year – Paul Gordon Collier

Towards a Gay Communism – Elements of a Homosexual Critique – Mario Mieli

Humanizing Pedophilia as Stigma Reduction: A Large-Scale Intervention Study – Craig A Harper, Rebecca Lievesley, Nicholas J Blagden, Kerensa Hocken – From the National Library of Medicine

Trump vs. The Black-Robed Tyrants: Can 100 Years of Judicial Tyranny be Reversed?

pgnewser March 7, 2025

Originally published February 28, 2025 for our End-of-Month Issue of Mindful Intelligence Advisor.  Subscribe to get semi-monthly issues.

By Joshua Bontrager, Political & Cultural Correspondent

 “Trump, I believe, understands he is in a fight to the death. The American establishment tried to discredit and ruin him, to imprison him, to assassinate him. They stole his 2020 reelection from him. They tried to steal his New York properties. It is not possible for Trump to have illusions about what he is up against. He is up against evil.” –Paul Craig Roberts

“And I charged your judges at that time, saying, Hear the causes between your brethren, and judge righteously between every man and his brother, and the stranger that is with him.” –Deuteronomy 1:16

“You seem…to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions; a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy… The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots.” –Thomas Jefferson, Letter to William Jarvis, Sept. 28, 1820

INTRODUCTION

Donald Trump is “a president who counts every week like it’s his last,” says Vice President JD Vance. In his first six weeks, Trump has unleashed a historic, multi-faceted, and withering counter-revolution against the authoritarian Marxist regime that nearly destroyed America and himself.

Since 2016, the opposition has weakened significantly. The mainstream media is less trusted now than Trump, and has been exposed as mere state-funded propaganda. Fearful Senate Republicans have confirmed every one of Trump’s nominees thus far, while billionaire elites who once resisted Trump are eager to curry his favor and the Democratic Party remains toxic and rudderless.

Against this surging America First tide, rogue judges have issued a flurry of rulings to sabotage Trump’s popular mandate. In their minds, “defending democracy” means “protecting the Deep State” while defying the Constitution and American voters.

President Trump is no stranger to judicial tyranny, as his administration lost about two-thirds of lawsuits filed against it in his first term. Trump survived the Russiagate hoax and two impeachments. Multiple courts rejected challenges to the rigged 2020 election, including the U.S. Supreme Court, which refused to hear an election lawsuit in December 2020 from 18 state attorneys general and 106 Republican members of Congress.

Ultimately, judges were unable to bankrupt and imprison Trump, remove him from the ballot, and block his return to power. Now, they are desperate to stop Trump and his allies before his renewed war on the Deep State becomes impossible to reverse.

This report will (1) break down the 80+ lawsuits against the Trump administration, (2) review the history and growth of judicial tyranny in America, beginning with the poisonous ideologies of Hegel, Marx, and Darwin, and (3) assess how current legal battles will likely play out in the days ahead.

  1. 80+ LAWSUITS FILED AGAINST TRUMP

“Appointed federal judges, on their own subjective judgment and using all their power, have written pieces of paper that overruled the wishes of 74.2 million Americans who have expressed their will concerning the shape of the regime that rules them. Instead, they say, permanent bureaucrats should rule all without any say from the voters who pay all the bills. That is called tyranny.” –Jeffrey A. Tucker

Eighty-eight lawsuits have been filed against the Trump administration (according to Fox News), with most of them emanating from Civil Service Strong, a coalition launched by lawfare assassins Marc Elias and Norm Eisen on December 19, 2024. The coalition includes all Democratic state attorneys general and eight key leftist groups.

Multiple lawsuits have been funded indirectly by Mark Zuckerberg (who now claims to be pro-Trump). Since 2015, the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative has funneled $2 billion to the Silicon Valley Community Foundation, which supports the anti-Trump legal outfit Protect Democracy.

  1. TRUMP LOSSES – Over 30 rulings have paused various aspects of Trump’s agenda:

While the media has framed many of the above rulings as absolute defeats for Trump, some have been temporary restraining orders, not longer-term preliminary injunctions, meaning they only temporarily delay Trump’s agenda.

  1. TRUMP WINS – Judges have also ruled in favor of President Trump:
  1. OBSTRUCTIONIST JUDGES – Many of the rogue judges were appointed by Democrats such as Obama and Biden, but some were appointed by Bush, Reagan, and even Trump. Most are loyal to the Deep State, not the American Republic. The judges include Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, who sentenced seven peaceful pro-lifers to prison, including a 75-year-old grandma, and Judge Angel Kelly, who is friendly to Communist China and has said that systemic racism plagues America’s judicial system.
  2. THE ROOTS OF AMERICAN JUDICIAL TYRANNY

“The rule of law, not the rule of men, is the foundation of a free society.” –John A. Stormer, Betrayed by the Bench, 2005

In 1962, the Republican majority-appointed Supreme Court ruled to remove prayer and the Bible from government schools. In 1973, the Court condemned over 60 million innocent unborn babies to death in Roe v. Wade.

In 2015, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 to recognize same-sex “marriage” in Obergefell v. Hodges. Following Obergefell, then-Ohio Gov. John Kasich (R) proclaimed, “The court has ruled, and it’s time to move on.” Many Republicans who were relieved that courts allowed them to wash their hands of controversial moral issues were unhappy when Roe was overturned.

Over 100 years, Supreme Court opinions centralized state power, corrupted morality, and perverted the Founding vision. Yet, the roots of judicial tyranny started with the Marxist/humanist ideology that infected America’s legal system 150 years ago.

  1. THE FOUNDING ERA – The Declaration of Independence criticized King George for “[making] Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.”

Judicial tyranny was discussed in The Federalist Papers, with James Madison writing in Number 47, “The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands…may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.”

The Founders envisioned Congress as the most powerful branch and the judiciary as the least powerful. However, Anti-Federalist and New York judge Robert Yates warned that the Constitution’s proposed Supreme Court would hold “immense powers” and be “very liberal” in interpreting the Constitution. (Yates ultimately withdrew from the Constitutional Convention because he said it was exceeding its instructions.)

In Marbury v. Madison (1803), the U.S. Supreme Court gave itself the power of judicial review, allowing the Court to de facto legislate by striking down laws it deemed unconstitutional, a power that was fully exercised in the 20th century.

Thomas Jefferson warned that allowing the judiciary to determine the constitutionality of laws would make it “a despotic branch” (1804 letter), and said the judiciary’s establishment of “law by precedent” was “sapping, by little and little, the foundations of the constitution” (1823 letter).

In his inaugural address, President Abraham Lincoln said if the Supreme Court is the final authority, “the people will have ceased to be their own rulers.”

  1. THE RISE OF LEGAL PROGRESSIVISM – In his Commentaries on the Laws of England, English jurist William Blackstone recognized God’s natural law as “binding over all the globe” and said that “no human laws are of any validity, if [they are] contrary to this.”

Post-Civil War, America shifted from Blackstone and the Christian common law recognized in the Declaration of Independence toward “case law,” inspired by George F.W. Hegel, Charles Darwin, and Karl Marx. In 1970, Christopher Columbus Langell was appointed Dean of Harvard Law School. Langell’s “case law” posited that legal right and wrong are determined not by absolutes, but by societal evolution.

Later Harvard legal minds promoted this new philosophy, including Dean Roscoe Pound. One of Pound’s followers, Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes, claimed, “We are under a constitution, but the constitution is what we say it is.” Presidents Woodrow Wilson (the father of the modern administrative state) and Franklin Delano Roosevelt heartily embraced this view. Decades later, Supreme Court Justice William J. Brennan asserted, “The genius of the Constitution rests not in any static meaning it may have had in a world dead and gone but in its evolving character.”

In 1920, the American Civil Liberties Association (ACLU) was founded by Fabian Socialists John Dewey and Roger Baldwin and Communists William Z. Foster and Elizabeth Gurley Flynn. In 1925, the ACLU initiated the “Scopes Monkey Trial” to promote evolution and denigrate Biblical Creationism.

Tragically, the corruption of American law coincided with the rise of mass propaganda, compulsory education, economic centralization, and cultural/family destruction.

  1. POWER OF THE SUPREME COURT – In the 1920s, 30s, and 40s, the Supreme Court increased its power and deployed the Commerce Clause and the Incorporation Doctrine to expand federal authority at the expense of states and individual liberties.

The Incorporation Doctrine used the 14th Amendment to turn the Bill of Rights – originally designed to limit federal government power – on its head and weaken the liberty of states and individuals.

The Mises Institute’s Ryan McMaken states, “We can have a functioning Tenth Amendment, or we can have an Incorporation Doctrine. But not both… The idea of the American confederation was to provide protections for liberty through competition among states, and through balancing state power against federal power.”

  1. HOW CURRENT LEGAL FIGHTS COULD PLAY OUT

“If a judge tried to tell a general how to conduct a military operation, that would be illegal. If a judge tried to command the attorney general in how to use her discretion as a prosecutor, that’s also illegal. Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power.” –Vice President JD Vance

Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the University of California Berkeley Law School, said, “It’s very frightening to think that they will disobey court orders. If they don’t, it will be a constitutional crisis unlike anything this country has seen, because if the president can violate constitutional laws and disobey court orders, then the name for that is a dictatorship.”

In reality, rogue judges fueled the current Constitutional crisis by shredding the Constitution for 100 years. Chemerinsky and his fellow regime apparatchiks despise constitutional law and American voters.

Deep Staters are panicked because their taxpayer-funded empire of grift, propaganda, and tyranny is crumbling, and they view the courts as their last line of defense.

  1. HOW WILL THE SUPREME COURT RULE? – With several exceptions, President Trump seems poised to let the current legal drama play out until it reaches the Supreme Court, which he hopes will rebuke lower court overreach. Justices Sotomayer, Jackson, and Kagan will vote against Trump, while Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch will likely favor Trump, leaving Roberts, Kavanaugh, and Barrett as the swing judges.

The Federalist’s Sean Davis contended, “John Roberts and SCOTUS have two options here: they can bring these inferior malcontents to heel, or they can get used to the President simply ignoring these inferior courts or Congress eliminating them entirely.”

On February 25, Chief Justice John Roberts delayed U.S. District Judge Amir Ali’s unconstitutional order demanding that Trump unfreeze $2 billion in questionable USAID contracts by midnight.

  1. WILL TRUMP DISMANTLE JUDICIAL SUPREMACISM? – For eight years, Trump has been assaulted by a weaponized legal system, leaving Trump and his allies battle-scarred, resolved, and organized in a way they were not in 2016. Consider these signals from key Trump allies:
  • Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt: “We believe these judges are acting as judicial activists rather than honest arbiters of the law. The real constitutional crisis is taking place within our judicial branch.”
  • Trump Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller: “The Founders created a unitary executive branch in which ‘the executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States.’ All executive power is vested in the one man elected by the whole nation. No unelected bureaucrat has any ‘independent’ ”
  • Vice President JD Vance in 2021: “Trump should…fire every single mid-level bureaucrat, every civil servant in the administrative state, replace them with our people, and…when the courts stop you, stand before the country like Andrew Jackson did and say the Chief Justice has made his ruling, now let him enforce it.”

The President who narrowly escaped at least two assassins is unlikely to let rogue judges thwart his efforts to decentralize government power and restore American greatness.

  1. WILL JUDICIAL ACTIVISM SPUR REFORM? – Below are several potential reforms that could be undertaken by Congress:

PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS

“If we don’t rid ourselves of the false construct of judicial supremacism, the same judges from January 6 in the D.C. federal district and circuit will be governing the country.” –Daniel Horowitz

Judicial activism will continue as Democrats, unable and unwilling to provide an alternative vision for America, fearmonger about “dictatorship” and “constitutional crisis.” These same Democrats will ignore the real constitutional crisis that began when humanists injected evolutionary “case law” into the legal system 150 years ago.

Either lawfare will defeat Trump’s second term as the plandemic did his first, or (more likely) rogue justices will give Trump an opportunity to weaken judicial supremacy or even end it once and for all.

If the Supreme Court upholds Trump’s agenda, the Left will continue tarring the Court – which shifted from 68% trust in 2019 to 44% trust in 2024 – as illegitimate. Such calls could motivate assassination attempts on conservative Supreme Court justices, similar to the 2022 media-inspired plot to assassinate Justice Kavanaugh. On the other hand, if the Supreme Court greenlights Trump’s agenda, Marxists could inflame riots and conflict “in the streets.”

However, Democrats will have difficulty reclaiming a popular narrative, as their Party doubles down on wokeness and once “respectable” DNC propaganda outlets lose taxpayer funding and viewers. Stopping Trump’s populist reforms will be difficult… but only if the President continues delivering on his promises and can avoid war, full-blown economic collapse, or a coup from the shifty billionaire tech elite.

While Trump and Congress can rein in out-of-line judges, American patriots must strive to strip unconstitutional powers from all three government branches and the bureaucracy and return authority to states and individuals. (The New American notes that nearly 80% of federal government “is unconstitutional”.)

In the final analysis, a greater challenge than reversing judicial tyranny and centralized power will be undoing the Marxist/humanist cultural revolution that destroyed America’s Biblically-based law, education, churches, economy, culture, and families over 150 years. Restoration will require rejecting the devil’s promise to “be as gods” (Genesis 3) and submitting to God’s divine wisdom and authority.

Former Communist Whitaker Chambers articulated the choice: “God or Man, Soul or Mind, Freedom or Communism.”

America still confronts this epochal crossroads, one that will determine the fate, not only of our legal system, but also of our future, families, and freedom.

FURTHER RESEARCH:

Betrayed By the Bench: How Judge-made Law Has Transformed America’s Constitution, Courts and Culture – John A. Stormer

Judicial Tyranny – Samuel Francis

The American Covenant: The Untold Story – Dr. Marshall Foster