Lawless Press

The collusion between the DNC and corporate media is more than obvious and, at this point, has become more than criminal and more than dangerous.
Americans that watch the DNC-controlled and serving MSM were afraid after Donald Trump won the election because the media told them lies like Trump was a Nazi, Trump would cancel the Constitution, Trump would enslave black people and criminalize the LGBTQ community. The question remains, will republican Attorney Generals ever prosecute the media for its crimes against Americans even if such action might be dangerous? Read the Editor’s Commentary on pg. x for more on this continued existential threat to America.

Lying Corporate Media Caused Kamala Voters’ Delusional Despair– thefederalist.com
Source Link
Excerpt:

Conservatives are not just currently celebrating Trump’s victory, but finding themselves drowning in the sudden flood of leftist tears. However good the schadenfreude might feel, we should realize that it isn’t the leftists themselves acting out in lamentation, but the totalitarian propaganda working through them.

Indeed, when we see college students and their professors sucking their thumbs and bundling up with their safety blankets in designated “coping spaces,” we shouldn’t point and laugh (at least not too loudly). We should say to ourselves, “There, but for the grace of God and His instrument Elon Musk, go I.”

One cannot overstate just how much influence the corporate press has over the majority of leftists. It’s less a bubble, and more a multi-layered, multi-dimensional, bomb-proof echo chamber that completely warps the reality of the person trapped in it. Perhaps it feels like a transparent and burstable bubble at first, but for so many leftists, it has morphed into a prison cell from which there is no escape. It’s like Orwell’s “double-think” in 1984, but more subtle and deep-seated.

This kind of mental illness should elicit more pity than revenge from conservatives, who, for all that they have suffered otherwise, have never been brainwashed like this. Free speech has always been a key feature of all the many strains of conservatism; opposing free speech is now the central principle of all the many strains of progressivism. Whether it’s establishing a welfare state, imposing an intersectional hierarchy, or dissolving all borders and traditions, it is necessarily predicated on controlling the flow of information and eliminating dissent.

Even as Donald Trump sues CBS over their edited interview with Kamala Harris in which it is clear CBS is running illegal political ads, not conducting journalism, more evidence of MSM collusion with the DNC emerged. The Harris campaign gave $500K to Al Sharpton’s non-profit a few weeks before the anti—American activist, Sharpton himself, “interviewed” Kamala Harris the way an infomercial host “interviews” the President of the company who makes the product being sold.

Kamala Harris Campaign Gave $500k to Al Sharpton’s Nonprofit Weeks Before Glowing Interview With Anti-Semitic MSNBC Host– freebeacon.com
Source Link
Excerpt:

Kamala Harris’s presidential campaign donated $500,000 to Al Sharpton’s nonprofit organization just weeks before the anti-Semitic MSNBC host—who once said that “diamond merchant” Jews have the “blood of innocent babies” on their hands—conducted a friendly interview with Harris.

The campaign’s remittance to Sharpton’s National Action Network was part of a flurry of donations—$5.4 million in all—to black and Latino advocacy groups that seem aimed at winning Harris support from those constituencies. Harris’s campaign gave two payments of $250,000 to National Action Network on Sept. 5 and Oct. 1, according to campaign finance records.

On Oct. 3, Sharpton aired a video of Harris wishing him happy birthday on his MSNBC weekend show, PoliticsNation with Al Sharpton. “Happy birthday, Rev,” Harris said, using Sharpton’s nickname. “You have been over all of your years such an extraordinary leader. You have been a voice of truth, a voice of conscience.”

Sharpton, 70, conducted a glowing interview with Harris on Oct. 20 in which he touted her “extraordinary historic campaign” while referring to Trump as “hostile and erratic.” His questions lined up closely with messages that Harris sought to highlight on the campaign trail. Sharpton addressed concerns among black voters—especially black men—about Harris’s record as a prosecutor in California, where she was given the nickname “Kamala the Cop.” Sharpton brought up Shirley Chisholm, the first black woman elected to Congress, and one of Harris’s personal heroes, to put Harris’s candidacy in historical perspective. Sharpton asked Harris whether men who opposed her were “misogynistic.”