The lone-hold-out in the Lindsay Clancy child murder trial is now facing a lawfare campaign by the Clancy Defense team. Clancy Attorney Keving Reddington is hoping Judge William Sullivan will examine the juror’s private data to determine if he did something inappropriate. The judge has yet to rule on the unusual filing. This is the same attorney who led a campaign against the holdout juror while deliberations were still going on.
Lindsay Clancy’s Defense Takes Aim at the Lone Holdout Juror– www.louderwithcrowder.com
News Source
EXCERPT:
In Massachusetts, juror intimidation is a felony offense. And while I am not saying the defense attorney in the Lindsay Clancy case is doing just that, if the shoe fits, it fits!
It should come as no surprise that Clancy’s defense does not like the fact that the lone Black juror voted against the best interests of Clancy. You see, unlike the feminist mob on the jury, he just could not get over the fact that Lindsay killed her three kids one by one. According to her defense, however, this means he is partial, may have lied to get on the jury, and subjected the defendant to a partial jury.
Lindsay Clancy’s attorney wants the judge presiding over her case to investigate the lone holdout juror from her murder trial.
In a motion filed Friday, Sept. 18, Kevin Reddington asked Judge William Sullivan to review the juror’s cell phone data usage during deliberations.
The motion also requested that juror questionnaires be preserved and that the court provide under seal which background checks were conducted and if the juror was involved in any matter involving the Plymouth County District Attorney’s Office.
