The Fauci Diaries By Paul Gordon Collier, Editor NOTE: The original link to the pdf, which was released on…
You must be logged in to view this content.
z1a Deep Dive
By Paul Gordon Collier, Editor “Hundreds of millions of US voter files are in the hands of foreign governments. Our…
You must be logged in to view this content.
Originally published June 26, 2026 for our weekly Issue of Mindful Intelligence Advisor. Subscribe to get weekly issues. By Paul…
You must be logged in to view this content.
Originally published June 19, 2026 for our weekly Issue of Mindful Intelligence Advisor. Subscribe to get weekly issues. By Paul…
You must be logged in to view this content.
Originally published June 12, 2026 for our weekly Issue of Mindful Intelligence Advisor. Subscribe to get weekly issues.
By Paul Gordon Collier, Editor
“In a society governed passively by free markets and free elections, organized greed always defeats disorganized democracy.” – Matt Taibbi, from Griftopia: Bubble Machines, Vampire Squids, and the Long Con That Is Breaking America
INTRODUCTION
Since its birth, America has allowed some form of mail-in ballots, a fact proponents of today’s mass mailer elections often cite. But it wasn’t until the year 2000 that mail-in ballots were beginning to be considered as the go-to form of voting, not the voting of last resort.
Mail-in ballots are for those who could not realistically vote in person on the day of the election, now they’ve become the majority way people vote wherever they are allowed carte blanche access to the mail-in ballot
In California’s Los Angeles, a race for Mayor was decided by an overwhelming majority of mass mailer votes, with most of the total ballots coming from the ballot boxes.
The system necessitates the creation of expensive tabulation and validation machines all housed in one massive warehouse where hundreds of workers go through the process of validating and tabulating ballots. The larger the scale of the voting, the more massive the machine, and the more opportunities for fraud that will arise.
The system allows for easy ballot harvesting since the voter is not in a secure voting booth. They might be homeless on the street and get accosted and forced to sign their signature to a blank ballot, one that can be used later according to what’s needed.
The mayor’s election has turned into a flashpoint for the whole mass mailer “debate,” and progressives don’t realize that, among Americans, they’ve already lost the argument.
No matter what technological claim they can muster to assure us a massive mail voting system is more secure than voting in person on paper ballots using U.S. citizen affirming voter ID (as opposed to signature recognition software), basic common sense clearly refutes it.
Yet, they need this mass mailer voting machine, for without it their candidates would fail. Yet that desperate need for non-transparent elections is what will force them to double down on their mass mailer voter machine even as more and more people grow to understand just how harmful it is to a free people.
How this election played out, how it was covered, and what has unfolded since, is a true bellwether for the political spirit of this land. Progressives are doubling down on their claims, hiding behind technological jargon and “experts,” but plain facts even the non-engaged can see are increasingly countering them, as we see happening here.
A. ELECTION DAY
On election day, at 8:00pm local time, June 2nd, 2026, the election results for Los Angeles Mayors race came in. These numbers represented same-day voting, early voting, and mail-in ballots already received. Over 400 ballot boxes throughout the city automatically locked, preparing for ballot collection by two-person teams.
The ballots to be counted were overwhelmingly in two categories, ballots sitting in drop boxes throughout the city and mailed-in ballots that would be given the next 7 days after the day of the election to come in.
Mail-in ballots, overall, account for more than 80% of the vote.
At 8:00pm, the incumbent, Progressive Karen Bass, secured the top spot with 34.3% of the vote while the Republican, Spencer Pratt, scored 30%. In third place was Progressive Nithya Raman at 23%. That night, Raman gave a baleful concession speech where she lamented her part in letting her supporters down.
Spencer Pratt gave a victory speech, and the political activists prepared for the battle in the general election. But that battle would never happen, and it would become clear it wouldn’t the very next day, when the numbers began to change.
B. THE SURGE
The final vote tally would see Spencer Pratt drop out of the top two, leaving Los Angeles with a choice between a far-left anti-American progressive activist and a far-left anti-American progressive activist, just what the Democratic Party, the de facto Progressive State, wanted.
Raman went from getting 23% of the early votes the early mail-in ballot counts, and the in-person votes to almost 40% from among the remaining mail-in ballots. This surge moved her ahead of Spencer Pratt, finishing at 28% to Pratt’s 23%. His support in the late ballots dropped from 30% to under 13%.
The district is 18% Republican, 23% Independent, and 51% Democrat, but somehow 70% of the remaining ballots voted for two far-left progressive candidates.
- THE PROBABILITY – Mathematically, any AI will tell you that the statistical probability of a surge like this happening is just about nil, zero, nada, zilch, virtually impossible. It’s not unlikely, it’s statistically irrelevant as a chance happening. It is something close to randomly picking the exact same grain of sand in all the earth 100 times in a row.
- THE DEFENSE – The bellwether defense is the claim that the further left you go in the spectrum, the longer you wait to vote. You almost never vote in person and you almost always wait to vote until the end. The reason for the surge might be mathematically impossible, but because of “the blue shift” you can always expect the furthest left candidate to have a “late surge.”
This isn’t the first time a far-left candidate managed to take out a moderate or conservative second-place candidate in a late surge, and that pattern is counted as evidence that the system works as intended.
The pattern of leftists winning during after-election vote counting is evidence that leftists are not using fraud to win elections through vote counting.
C. THE PROCESS
Los Angeles residents can vote one of four ways, early in-person voting, same-day in-person voting, mail in your ballot through the postal service, or drop your ballot off at a ballot box. Some of them might “choose” multiple options.
Nearly 82% of the residents who vote do so through the mail-in ballot. Of those, 68% were dropped off in the ballot boxes. This means more than 55% of the votes tabulated were retrieved from those ballot boxes.
On the night of the election, at 8pm local time, the ballot boxes lock. Two-person teams of election workers go out to retrieve the ballots. The exact number of teams was not given. They are employees of the county, which is overwhelmingly controlled by the progressives.
There are 400 ballot boxes for the teams to fetch ballots from.
Meanwhile the ballots aren’t done coming in, for the mailed in ballots are given 7 days after the election to arrive, if they have a postmark on or before election day on it.
There are lots of protocols to “assure” no fraud can take place, such as having two-person teams to “assure” no one can put in fake ballots. There are assurances for ballot reliance, which include signature recognition software that “exactly matches” the registered voter to confirm it belongs to them. No such exacting software exists, by the way.
All of the assurances rely on faith the technology does what they say it does, that there are no “clever ways” to easily circumvent their safeguards (because how could we know since we don’t understand the technology), and that somehow the mere creation of multiple points for fraud isn’t reason enough to abandon this mass mailer election machine.
D. THE FOLLOW-UP
As Republicans began to question the validity of the “Blue Shift” defense, the Progressive State content marketers spread the narrative that only ignorant and racist people would doubt the blue shift miracles that keep happening specifically in California, especially in Los Angeles County.
The GOP hope for California Governor, Steve Hilton, looked to be heading towards a similar fate to Pratt before it was suddenly announced he was the second-place winner. His win is offered as proof the system is just fine, but some suspect, as do I, this was done to stop the growing scrutiny on their whole allegedly corrupt system.
Johnny Law is on their trail, however, and that was first seen by First Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli, who has accused California of preventing his office from conducting a federal audit on their voter rolls. He accused the county of hiding dead and non-citizen voter registrations from the federal inquiry.
Essayli appears intent on expanding his investigation to the mass mailer election machine itself, the heart of progressive power.
An article in NBC News on this action reveals the content marketing, agit prop nature of this political activist machine. They write, “‘We will follow the evidence wherever it leads and prosecute any violations of federal election law to the fullest extent,’ said Essayli, who criticized California’s mail voting — a frequent target of Trump’s false claims of election fraud.”
Evidence of ballot harvesting has already been found from the testimonies of homeless people who claim they were paid to vote for one of the progressive candidates. One woman claimed she cast 4 or 5 ballots for payment in one day.
One citizen found a public display in a West LA Library encouraging illegal aliens to vote. The citizen wrote on X, “Riddle me this LA: If it’s illegal for non-citizens to vote, why the Hell does the West LA Library have a display for non-citizens that includes a VOTER REGISTRATION specifically for non-citizens that allows them to ‘preregister’ to vote.
“They even have a special section on the registration that allows you to vote ANONYMOUSLY if you don’t feel “safe” putting your address. Gee what could possibly go wrong?! Seems it’s be pretty easy to send in that form and get a ballot even if you legally can’t vote in California and no one would ever know if you do it anonymously and the worst part is…
“LA has apparently made this “legal” despite it being against federal law. Found at: West Los Angeles Public Library 11360 Santa Monica Blvd Los Angeles, CA 90025”
OAN claims whistleblowers from inside the California ballot processing facility are accepting ballots of 16-year-olds if they voted the right way.
There are also claims that thousands of Spencer Pratt voters have been receiving ballot rejection letters claiming their signature did not match the one on the ballot. A picture of one such letter was posted on X, but it hasn’t been confirmed.
The O’Keefe group found ballots stuffed in a library days after the election was over. O’Keefe posted on X, “We have just received this picture from within Stevenson Ranch Library near Santa Clarita, CA. The photo allegedly shows multiple ballots inside of the libraries own safe, this is where the library keeps other things such as cash.
This picture was taken last Friday. We are hopeful these ballots made it to the right processing centers.”
Remember, evidence is not proof. Evidence does not definitively, by itself prove an argument, it only helps it. So when the Progressive State Content Marketers, the MSM, claims “There is no evidence of election fraud in California,” as one MS Now reporter claimed, you know you are dealing with a marketer, not a journalist.
One of the Progressives’ content marketing satellites, “The Guardian,” posted this agit prop headline as the evidence of fraud began to emerge, “Experts warn Trump ‘inventing fraud’ in California as president ramps up baseless claims.” That’s a real headline, folks.
The Democrats’ top man in the U.S. House, Hakeen Jeffries, claims “I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s part of some far-right conspiracy theory to convince people there’s fraud in California.” This is his coded way of saying only white supremacists believe their lying eyes, don’t be a white supremacist and believe your lying eyes.
He said this AFTER a reporter, not a content marketer, said to him after claiming there was NO EVIDENCE of voter fraud in California, “There are homeless people on Skid Row admitting they were bribed with cash and drugs to vote Democrat in elections…”
SUMMARY
The bellwether takeaway from my investigation in the LA Mayors Race is the Democrats have created a source for power, the Mass Mailer Election machine, that looks increasingly to be their potential downfall.
The Progressives’ unwillingness to believe there are more victims of their policies than winners will be their end. To them, the victims who have been crying out are fringe elements clinging on to white power, whether as a white or someone now called “white-adjacent.”
Progressives do not understand the real existential harm people are perceiving they are suffering as a direct result of their policies. Real or imagined, the perceptions are profoundly real to an increasing number of Americans, this writer included.
It is as if they insist everyone right-handed should be forced to write left-handed, and everyone left-handed are now the only source for truth.
While I am left-handed, identity epistemology (truth is understood through truthful beingnesses, like blackness or homosexual, not whiteness or heterosexual), is nonsensical.
It is one thing for them to believe right-handed people should write left-handed and left-handed people are the true source for truth, just by being left-handed, but it is another thing to win mass mailer elections so they can inflict that policy on the majority of human beings that don’t want to sign up for their anti-American, anti-human program.
Their pathological view of the world has turned them into violent zealots who believe they are doing the “good people” a “good thing” using any means, including mass mailer election fraud, to destroy the evil outside their “left-handed people are now the only source for truth” world.
Their growing inability to see the other as anything but an existential threat to their sense of righteous indignation is making them blind to simple power realities that are setting them up for a spectacular defeat. This is assuming they keep pushing their policies as hard as they have been.
One thing not understood by progressives is that perception eventually overcomes slogans when perception becomes too difficult to ignore. While more and more Americans are becoming painfully aware of the true criminal insanity of the Progressive State dream, far too many still think the Democrats are just the party of the disenfranchised and “a woman’s right to choose.”
Abortion and anti-white racism keep the party afloat.
The pain being inflicted on Americans means the Progressives must protect themselves from the voters. This is where the mass mailer machines come in. While they need the mass mailer machine to insulate them from a real voter revolt, its creation could be the source of their demise.
So long as the policies of mass mailer elected governments do not inflict too great of a pain on too many people that can also find each other, a content people will pay little attention to accusations of fraud.
But when policies harm too many people, that mass mailer machine is an open wound.
It gives your enemies, especially we Americans, the power to charge you with disenfranchisement not because of documented “fraud” but because the whole complexity of the system creates zero confidence in its legitimization.
Its “legitimization” is based on complex technical assertions the layman (which includes me) must take at face value from “experts” we no longer have any confidence in because their policies, by our perception, are so violently anti-human.
The more your policies perceptively harm the governed, the more the mere convoluted nature of your mass mailer system will create real, profound perceptions of disenfranchisement. Where your policies align with the vast majority, or at least do not perceptively directly threaten the peace of the vast majority, your mass mailer system will be tolerated, for it makes it convenient for people to vote.
We do not question automatic convenience unless and until it creates pain.
The convoluted mechanisms involved in mass mailer elections create legitimate opportunities for your opponents to doubt the validity of the overall system.
Mass mailer election entanglements are rife with opportunities for fraud. Every change of custody, every extended day, before and after election day, creates new opportunities for fraud. This is basic common sense, it needs no technological understanding, nor is there a technology that can overcome this fact.
When the state wins with mass mailer votes, but delivers suffering afterwards, the mass mailer system will become the symbol of your illegitimacy. It will be an easy monster to create, especially because it’s far more real than the monster you rode to power, the white devil.
The mass mailer ballot will become the symbol of your tyranny and your illegitimacy as one who rules through the approval of the people.
You rule through the approval of technical veils disguised as elections.
The only way you can stop this growing narrative is to violate our American rights even harder than you already have, which will only make your targets more determined to stop you, eventually by violence. This would be a bad outcome for everyone, so if it ends here, in violence, we Americans have already failed.
In addition to causing your targets more pain, you will also expand the number of people who now directly experience the pain of your policies. These people will be the families and friends of your targets who have never quite believed you are the anti-American Progressive that you truly are.
If their voting district is in a mass mailer district, they already have an easy symbol of your tyranny to rally others around, a real devil, with real devil powers, created by the Progressive State to overthrow the American Republic from within.
FURTHER RESOURCES:
A Timeline of Mail-in Voting – We Vote
Originally published May 29, 2026 for our weekly Issue of Mindful Intelligence Advisor. Subscribe to get weekly issues. By Paul…
You must be logged in to view this content.
Originally published May 15, 2026 for our weekly Issue of Mindful Intelligence Advisor. Subscribe to get weekly issues. By Paul…
You must be logged in to view this content.
Originally published May 8, 2026 for our weekly Issue of Mindful Intelligence Advisor. Subscribe to get weekly issues. Bellwether Report –…
You must be logged in to view this content.
Originally published May 1, 2026 for our monthly Issue of Mindful Intelligence Advisor. Subscribe to get weekly issues. By Staff “There…
You must be logged in to view this content.
Originally published April 24, 2026 for our weekly Issue of Mindful Intelligence Advisor. Subscribe to get weekly issues. By Michael A.…
You must be logged in to view this content.
Originally published April 17, 2026 for our weekly Issue of Mindful Intelligence Advisor. Subscribe to get weekly issues. Bellwether Deep Dive…
You must be logged in to view this content.
Originally published April 10, 2026 for our weekly Issue of Mindful Intelligence Advisor. Subscribe to get weekly issues. DATE: 26-01-01 to…
You must be logged in to view this content.
Originally published March 27, 2026 for our weekly Issue of Mindful Intelligence Advisor. Subscribe to get weekly issues. By STAFF “When…
You must be logged in to view this content.
Report By Michael A. Cessna, Military Affairs Correspondent
Summary by Paul Gordon Collier, Editor
Originally published June 13, 2025 for our Mid-Month Issue of Mindful Intelligence Advisor. Subscribe to get semi-monthly issues.
“We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations a new world order, a world where the rule of law, not the law of the jungle, governs the conduct of nations. When we are successful, and we will be, we have a real chance at this new world order, an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the U.N.’s founders.” –George H.W. Bush after an Iraqi Airstrike, January 17, 1991
INTRODUCTION
Donald Trump’s return to the presidency has marked one of the most dramatic foreign policy transformations in recent American history.
The 47th President’s approach to international relations during this critical period has demonstrated a deliberate departure from conventional diplomatic norms, employing what leftist observers, like Emma Ashford, termed a “move fast and break things” approach to foreign policy that prioritizes rapid, often chaotic transformation over incremental change.
Unlike traditional Presidential transitions that prioritize continuity and measured change, Trump entered his second term with an unprecedented burst of executive actions, signing at least 142 executive orders in his first 100 days, more than any other U.S. president in their first 100 days in office.
As Editor Paul Gordon Collier noted in Part One of our Second 100 Days report, “Donald Trump has signed more executive orders in the first 100 days than any other U.S. President in history, with 152. The list includes 3 Democrats in positions 2-4 before Trump shows up again in 5th for his first term’s first 100 days (with 33 executive orders). Second place is Franklin D. Roosevelt with 99 executive orders, third place is Harry S. Truman with 57 executive orders, and fourth place is Joe Biden with 42 executive orders.
Of those executive orders, 44 have been blocked by the judiciary, mostly at the District Court level. The number of reverses of those blocking orders is disputed, but somewhere between 2-5 are the numbers most often given.
This writer does not assume every executive order by Trump is constitutional, though those executive orders might not even be the ones that have been struck down and/or challenged.
The sheer volume of executive orders, however, is astounding. Given the fact he wrote 50% more executive orders than one of the most far-left authoritarian Presidents of all-time, FDR, one should be sobered by that high number.”
This “assertive” approach has fundamentally altered America’s relationships with allies and adversaries alike, while pursuing an expansionist vision that challenges international norms established by the 1945 UN Charter (something many Americans probably voted for), to break the old “new world order” set by Bush I.
A. THE CURRENT SITUATION IN THE UKRAINE: PROMISES AND REALITIES
Trump entered office with hopes of producing a ceasefire in Ukraine in “one day.”
Reaching a ceasefire agreement during the first 100 days of the second Trump presidency, let alone a peace deal, has arguably proven much harder than the President might have expected. Trump himself eventually acknowledged this difficulty, saying he was joking about the one-day timeline.
While that timeline has proven overly optimistic, Trump’s shift towards Russia from adversarial to conversational counters the Uniparty consensus on Russia.
However, the administration’s diplomatic efforts began immediately, with Trump announcing he had called Russian President Vladimir Putin to discuss a possible ceasefire deal on February 12, marking the first known conversation between the presidents since Trump assumed office in January.
Despite multiple rounds of negotiations mediated through various channels, including meetings in Saudi Arabia and Istanbul, substantive progress remained elusive. By late May, Trump said after his call with President Vladimir Putin that Russia and Ukraine would immediately start negotiations for a ceasefire, but the Kremlin said the process would take time, with Trump indicating reluctance to impose additional sanctions on Moscow.
The signs of an entirely different approach to Ukraine were starkly laid out on February 28, 2025, when Trump, Vice President JD Vance, and Volodymyr Zelenskyy held a highly combative bilateral meeting televised live in the Oval Office that was meant to discuss a Ukraine-U.S. mineral resources agreement.
During the meeting, Trump bluntly told Zelenskyy, “You’re not winning this. You have a damn good chance of coming out okay because of us” and “You don’t have the cards. You’re buried there.”
The meeting ended abruptly without signing the planned agreement, and Trump canceled a planned news conference. Media outlets described it as an unprecedented public confrontation between an American president and a foreign head of state.
The practical implications have been significant. Trump also said he had been in “serious discussions with Russia” and had “received strong signals that they are ready for peace” while simultaneously pressuring Ukraine through aid suspensions and public criticism.
When negotiations stalled, Trump’s frustration became evident. The United States will walk away from efforts to broker a Russia-Ukraine peace deal unless there are clear signs of progress soon, U.S. President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in April, with Rubio emphasizing, “We need to determine very quickly now, and I’m talking about a matter of days, whether or not this is doable in the next few weeks.”
B. MIDDLE EAST COMPLEXITIES: GAZA AND REGIONAL AMBITIONS
The President came into office with big radical visions for the Gaza Strip, proposing what he termed a “freedom zone” for the territory.
His most controversial suggestion, timed with the arrival of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu – the first world leader to arrive at the White House on February 4, signaling the administration’s strong support for Israel – involved the idea that the U.S. might “take over” and “own” the Gaza Strip, envisioning long-term U.S. control and the relocation of Palestinians to neighboring countries, turning Gaza into the “Riviera of the Middle East.”
However, the administration has also pursued unexpected diplomatic openings. Trump hosted Netanyahu again in April to inform him of the U.S. decision to enter nuclear talks with Iran, a move that reportedly blocked Israeli plans for military action against Iran’s nuclear program. Jerusalem worries that Trump will accept an agreement with Tehran that fails to contain the regime’s nuclear ambitions. As of right now, that block is not in place as Israel has struck a major blow against Iran that is still ongoing even as I write this.
C. GLOBALIST INSTITUTIONAL DISMANTLING AND A BUREAUCRATIC REVOLUTION
One of Trump’s most dramatic foreign policy moves involved the systematic dismantling of America’s international engagement apparatus. The administration has shuttered the U.S. Agency for International Development, the Millennium Challenge Account, Voice of America, and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty.
The scale of these cuts was unprecedented, with at least 121,000 workers fired from federal agencies, including 10,000 employees fired from the Agency for International Development (USAID), where 100 percent of the jobs were culled.
This institutional dismantling extended beyond foreign aid agencies. On January 20, his first day in office, Trump signed 26 executive orders, which included withdrawing from the World Health Organization and renaming the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America. The broader pattern reflected what globalist critics described as an assault on the foundations of American global leadership. MAGA voters would call this the dismantling of the globalist world order, from without and from within.
By the end of those first 100 days, the Trump World Order has replaced the old agreements.
D. TRUMP’S WORLD ORDER EMERGES
- TRUMPOLARISM – President Trump came out the gates calling for Canada to become the fifty-first state, proposing to buy Greenland, and taking action to retake control of the Panama Canal. The President appears to be done with the global order’s way of doing things and has opted for unipolarism over globalism.
- ALLIANCE RE-ALIGNMENT – Trump’s approach to traditional alliances during his first 100 days demonstrated a fundamental shift in American foreign policy priorities. Trump has forced a rethink of the U.S. commitment to NATO, creating ruptures with transatlantic allies while simultaneously challenging the European Union in myriad ways: withdrawing from the Paris climate agreement, imposing sweeping tariffs on European countries, and telling them to take care of their own security.
The impact on traditional alliances has been paradigm-shifting. Trump’s aggressive stance toward Canada has completely upended what was traditionally a close relationship, with Trump telling reporters, “Canada only works as a state. We don’t need anything they have.”
3. MILITARY POWER – In contrast, Trump’s military deployments against various factions in the Middle East presented a reminder that, even given the somewhat dilapidated state the U.S. armed forces found themselves in after the four years of the Biden administration, the United States still packs a massive punch when it decides to deploy it.
Trump’s most significant military action during his first 100 days was Operation Rough Rider, a large-scale campaign against Yemen’s Iran-backed Houthis launched on March 15, 2025. The operation marked the biggest U.S. military operation in the Middle East since Trump took office, targeting the group over their serious disruption of Red Sea shipping traffic since October of 2023.
The campaign began with strikes on 30-plus targets at multiple locations, including terrorist training sites, drone infrastructure, weapons manufacturing capabilities, and command-and-control centers.
The strikes killed at least 53 people and wounded almost 100 others, including “multiple” Houthi leaders, according to U.S. national security adviser Michael Waltz.
Unlike the Biden administration’s limited and ineffectual approach, Trump granted broader authority to operational commanders and showed less reluctance about potential casualties. The campaign hit 1,000 targets and killed hundreds of Houthi fighters over nearly two months.
The operation concluded on May 6, 2025, when Trump announced the U.S. would stop bombing the Houthis after the group agreed to halt attacks on shipping lanes, though the Houthis indicated they would continue targeting Israel.
- REMOVING THE CANCER WITHOUT KILLING THE HOST
The administration’s approach to great power competition revealed internal contradictions, or, perhaps more accurately, conflicting concerns. While some policies appeared designed to counter Chinese influence, the administration has been willing to accept the risk of ending USAID and VOA so suddenly that it creates opportunities for America’s enemies to move in.
Trump is dismantling America’s soft power machine, but if the administration is right in its assumptions that much of this apparatus serves the globalist agenda, not the America First agenda, the damage these tax-funded institutions can continue to do is far more than the damage done by immediately terminating them.
It does open the door for China (and it already has), but it also immediately shuts the door on the insurrectionists within the government.
Beyond bilateral relationships, Trump has sought to completely dismantle the leftist-captured bureaucratic apparatus working aggressively against his “America First” policy.
In so doing, some cuts may have been too hasty. For instance, Trump dismantled some of America’s most essential cyber programs, including more than $175 million in grants and contracts for partner capacity building through USAID cuts.
These moves, then, reflect Trump’s broader skepticism about the nature of these government programs that seem to push anti-American and/or leftist values over American ones. It also appears to reflect his preference for direct, bilateral engagement over multilateral institutions with their own foreign policy agendas and lack of accountability (until now).
E. LATIN AMERICA AND IMMIGRATION DIPLOMACY
President Trump followed through with his promise to begin mass deportations in his first 100 days. This has put Latin America to the fore of U.S. foreign policy. This has led to unprecedented cooperation mechanisms, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio making his first international trip to the region, visiting Panama, El Salvador, Costa Rica, Guatemala, and the Dominican Republic.
The approach has been effective in achieving stunning cooperation. The United States later transferred illegal aliens to El Salvador, with many Liberal and anti-Trump hawkers alleging that they weren’t gang members at all.
Despite accusations of human rights violations by DNC operatives and their allies, many Latin American leaders are happy to facilitate these deportations – and not only those who seek a close relationship with Trump.
- THE EL SALVADOR PRISON DEAL – One of the Trump administration’s most controversial foreign policy innovations involved an unprecedented agreement with El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele to accept criminal deportees.
Under this arrangement, El Salvador’s government receives about $6 million to imprison 300 alleged members of the Venezuelan Tren de Aragua gang in the country’s notorious mega-prison known as the Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT).
The program relied heavily on Trump’s invocation of the 1798 Alien Enemies Act to justify deportations in an effort to cut the criminals off from getting what the Trump administration would characterize as “undo due process,” or “due process not granted to illegal alien criminals by the constitution.”
Since March, Washington has transferred at least 200 mostly Venezuelan alleged gang members and violent criminals to El Salvador. Unfortunately for the Trump administration, it would be determined that one person, a person the DNC criminal press called a “Maryland resident,” was deported in error.
The Trump Administration conceded to the courts, sort of. They had the illegal alien, Kilmar Abrego García, extradited back to the U.S. to face charges in Federal court for human trafficking, including of children.
Trump further expanded the scope of this partnership by expressing interest in sending U.S. citizens convicted of violent crimes to Salvadoran prisons, telling Bukele, “The homegrowns are next, the homegrowns. You’ve got to build about five more places.”
Legal experts described the concept as “obviously unconstitutional, obviously illegal,” since the U.S. government cannot forcibly remove citizens from the country for any reason.
In making these statements, Trump continued to pursue his apparent strategy of getting his political opposition to fly into near-hysterical rage, taking Trump literally at his word, despite the obvious silliness of his statements.
While this may be technically seen as “buffoonery,” it does seem to be working, as both Democrat politicians and Left-wing commentators repeatedly show themselves as both foolish and childish… This, of course, calls into question the veracity of the previously quoted polls.
The first 100 days of Trump’s second presidency thus established a pattern of maximum disruption combined with uncertain outcomes – an approach that prioritized the destruction of existing frameworks over the construction of viable alternatives, leaving both allies and adversaries struggling to adapt to an increasingly unpredictable American foreign policy.
SUMMARY
Written by Editor Paul Gordon Collier
More than any other aspect of the second first 100 days of the Trump administration, the entanglement of globalist far-left activism with America’s primary means of “soft power,” power projected through social and cultural influence, presents the most challenging problem.
On the one hand, the Trump administration NEEDS these institutions to do the work of American foreign policy; on the other hand, getting these institutions to carry forth with his policy was going to be nearly impossible as they existed on his second first day in office.
As many leaders will tell you, if you want to get “big things” done, do it as quickly as possible. The longer you wait, the less likely you will have the political capital to ever move so dramatically, so suddenly again. Taking office, he had tremendous political capital, capital he might never have again.
A second major conflicting issue is the nature of the American alliance, which has devolved to the point where America’s “allies” took it for granted that America would continue to meet the obligations of the old agreement, the Bretton Woods Agreement, without having to meet theirs.
This agreement essentially made it clear that America would give its allies favorable trade deals, provide for their defense, and keep the global trading lanes, especially the ocean ones, open. All they must do is simply go along with American foreign policy.
It was intended to contain Russian influence by offering the world prosperity over war. But since that agreement was first signed, in 1944, one part of the agreement has continued: America’s obligation. The second part, America’s allies’ obligations, have been met less and less until, at this point, the “alliances” serve the globalist agenda.
More insidiously, this globalist agenda works against the sovereignty of the nations in this same American-centered alliance (which worked against America’s interests, not for it). The UK, Northern Ireland, France, and Germany are all in this alliance, and they’re all heading towards state failure because they follow the same globalist, not American, foreign policies.
Trump must have understood going in that the old agreements were existential threats to American sovereignty and power. To his enemies, the loss of “respect” from allies is a testament to his failures; to Americans, the nations being served notice that America is now working in its own best interests, not the world’s, is a moment they’ve been wanting to see for at least two decades now.
Yet Trump hopes to ultimately keep these same allies, or at least most of them (including Canada and the UK), if they choose to reject the old new world order and embrace the Trump World Order.
This means he must balance out the need to preserve with the need to cull, knowing he has little time to make an impact that his successor cannot easily undo.
I am not sure there is anyone short of God who could hit the right balance between culling and preserving, but I will say this writer believes it is better, at this point, to ere on the side of culling too much than preserving too much, for a little leaven leavens the whole lump.
An America left with a little leftism is not an America that can survive anyway.
Cull away, Trump; let the chips fall where they may.
ED: NOTE: The last part of our report, on Tariffs, is being delayed until the End-Month Issue of MIA this June 27 (barring more urgent breaking news). It has been moved up to make space for our report on the ICE Raid Riots (see pg. 2).
FURTHER RESOURCES:
The Bretton Woods GATT System – Orin Kirshner
An Introduction to the WTO Agreements – Bhagirath Lai Das
The New World Order – A. Ralph Epperson
The Complete Idiot’s Guide to The New World Order – Alan Axelrod
By Paul Gordon Collier, Editor
Originally published June 13, 2025 for our Mid-Month Issue of Mindful Intelligence Advisor. Subscribe to get semi-monthly issues.
“And this is the writing that was inscribed: Mene, Mene, Tekel, and Parsin. This is the interpretation of the matter: Mene, God has numbered the days of your kingdom and brought it to an end; Tekel, you have been weighed in the balances and found wanting; Peres, your kingdom is divided and given to the Medes and Persians.” –Daniel 5:25-28
ED.NOTE: All accusations should be presumed to be allegations, allegations we believe are true but cannot yet clearly prove, mainly that the Democrat Party and its “allies” are attempting to trigger an insurrectionist event that will destroy the American republic and replace it with Progmerica, which is no America at all.
INTRODUCTION
The ICE raid riots are an ongoing story that will hardly be completed before we go to print on Friday, June 13. Normally, we would wait to do a report on a story like this, until it gets closer to some form of total or “chapter” completion. We’re not even going to see a chapter completion before this goes to print.
As of the writing of this report (June 12), President Donald Trump has ordered in hundreds of marines and a couple of thousand national guardsmen to stabilize Los Angeles (where the insurrectionist attacks first started).
In response, the DNC is now threatening a national event for June 14 called “No Kings” that promises to spread more terror to American cities. GOP states, the targets of these scheduled terror attacks, are bracing for the next battle.
This is not intended to be a report that captures the minutia of facts, but rather the emerging narratives, spirits, or zeitgeist that is emerging from these acts of insurrection. The open declaration of war by Democrats and their activists against the Federal government is disturbing enough as it is; the refusal of the DOJ to prosecute these top DNC leaders for openly inciting violence is even more disturbing, and why I felt the need to report on this so soon.
I decided to do an analysis of events around the ICE protests because right now America is closer than it ever has been to potentially becoming unstable for a short, or longer period of time. It might come through some level of Civil War or a disruption of interstate trade due to increased acts of leftist terrorism. It might also prove to be much sound and fury signifying nothing.
We will most likely have a sense of the bite of the left by the time the next publication comes to print, after their “No Kings” terror threat is carried out (or not carried out).
I believe our audience should get a sense of the state of things as they currently are (at least up until the day before printing) to make the best decision regarding what you might want to do to ensure you are ready should instability come, for however long. By the time we print our next issue, we will already being experiencing disruption, or learn there is no fire to their smoke.
A recent event happened in New York City that, this writer believes, captures a new zeitgeist emerging in America that shatters the paradigms the left has used to control the narrative for the last 50-plus years. That zeitgeist is emerging from the violent confrontations happening in more and more cities as insurrectionists attempt to shatter American stability.
If this new zeitgeist emerges, our “fears” will be laid to rest. America will rise again.
A. THE ICE RAID RIOT ZEITGEIST EMERGES
Occasionally, a moment happens that crystalizes a new zeitgeist rising in a culture. These types of images are often on their face jarring. They will have elements out of their old acceptable context that yet will reveal a “new acceptable” context.
For instance, recently, we had the startling image of Donald Trump rising with a raised fist, blood on his cheek. He was almost, but not quite, protected by a woman who seemed uncomfortable to touch him. On the other side was a man in shades looking more like he wanted to look cool rather than protect the President. They are worthy of their own symbolic zeitgeist analysis, but they’re not as relevant as the weak man who rose.
The incongruous combination of the weakness of a former President disheveled, bloodied, yet made strong by a determined cry and a fist pump, made the weakness of Trump himself “permissible” for people to look past. For in his weakness, he rose.
That image may be the very image that changed the zeitgeist of the political debate, a contest between the status quo empty suit that will keep to the plan versus the unstable, unpredictable, weak man who had been bloodied before the assassination attempt with 34 felony convictions. The weak man rose. The narrative was broken. America had “permission” to take a chance on a dangerous bet.
Recently, an exchange occurred, captured in a viral video, that rises almost to that level as far as zeitgeist-changing goes.
A woman was driving on her way to work when she was interrupted by a mob of ICE raid protestors, insurrectionists, who had illegally shut down the freeway she happened to be driving on. She got out of her car to beg the insurrectionists to let her go because she needed to make money to support her daughter.
The insurrectionists laughed to her face, claiming the children of immigrants are also in need.
The insurrectionists in this story were two white people, a mother in her 50s to 60s and her son in his 30s. The woman in this story is a black woman. The image you see is two white people confronting a black woman, telling her that the immigrant child is more important than her child.
The welfare bribe that won the black community over to the party that enslaved them might not be enough to keep black Americans on the DNC plantation anymore if they rightly perceive their needs are second, or even last, compared to the needs of illegal aliens.
From Legal Insurrection:
With traffic having ground to a halt at a busy intersection, the young woman gets out of her car and begs the mother-son team to let her get through. “I have a kid, and I need to go to work.”
The mother snapped, “These people [illegal immigrants] are having their children taken.”
“But what about my kid?” the young woman asked.
Too busy fighting for the rights of illegal immigrants, she replied sharply, “I can’t help you.”
Hernandez asked the protestors, “How do you all feel as white people stopping a black woman from going to work?”
The son, who looked to be in his thirties, turned to Hernandez and said sarcastically, “Oh no, not work.”
As a derisive smile crossed his face, he added, “I care so much.”
The symbolism here breaks an old paradigm and creates a new one. Here, you have on one side the representation of the DNC-CCP, the angry white suburban idler who might also be getting paid by an NGO to intentionally disrupt American cities. On the other side, you don’t see a Republican, a conservative; you see an American, a black woman who represents at this moment ALL OF AMERICA.
The white people look like the college class, the entitled. The black woman is a working woman, a middle-class, working-class woman. The division that is more important than race is the division between the college class and the working class, which is devastating to the DNC because its brand was that it represents the worker.
I guarantee you 99 percent of the alleged white supremacists in this country, MAGA people, identified with the black woman, recognized HER as the American, not the white leftist insurrectionists.
The paradigm of race is broken. The paradigm of leftist versus American has risen. Americans believe many things, come in many colors, but all believe in “live and let live,” in not interfering with your neighbor’s right to pursue their own truth, their own way, so long as they respect the rights of others to do the same.
America is not a biological expression; it is an ideal, an ideal manifest in the land we have been blessed to govern, a land that is the envy of the world, and why these insurrectionists are trying to help the world absorb it into its “gun-less and thought-less zones.”
It remains to be seen if this image will become the crystalizing image of this latest effort by the DNC-CCP to overthrow the republic, by any means necessary, through these ICE raid riots, but this writer is praying that it will.
B. HOW THE DNC FANNED THE FLAMES OF THE ICE RAID RIOTS
- HOW IT BEGAN – On June 6, 2025, Federal ICE Agents were serving warrants for criminal illegal aliens in a place of business where they discovered more illegal aliens. Insurrectionist activists were deployed by the various terrorist organizations the left has utilized for years to attempt to disrupt the arrest process, with one Democrat congresswoman being arrested and charged after assaulting ICE officers to “protect” criminal illegal aliens.
- INSURRECTIONIST PRESS FUELS MORE VIOLENCE – The DNC-CCP press immediately spread lies that there was a massive raid going on, characterizing the raids as something unconstitutional, agitating their brownshirt activists intentionally to bring a mob to harm the ICE agents.
From Newsbusters:
The latest L.A. riots came after ICE began enforcing immigration law and rounding up illegals in downtown Los Angeles, and the New York Times is desperately trying to downplay the radical and violent nature of the so-called protests by calling them “largely peaceful” (i.e., somewhat violent, as a trove of photos from Los Angeles prove).
A representative piece is “What to Know About the Immigration Protests in Los Angeles,” with this subhead attached: “Demonstrations against the Trump administration’s crackdown on immigration have been largely peaceful, but tensions flared after President Trump ordered National Guard troops to deploy to the city.”
The story is wrong right from the subhead. Riots were already ongoing, with stones hurled at cop cars, while the National Guard troops were sent to protect the Los Angeles Federal Building, which came under siege Friday by protesters.
These were known facts the press concealed. They could only have done so to incite violence against federal agents. But not only is the press in on the insurrection, so are the DNC-CCP-controlled AI bots, like ChatGPT, a digital terrorist if ever there was one.
- AI TERROR MACHINES – If you ask AI bots about the ICE RAID riots, you get large language model responses, all written within the presumed leftist paradigm. ChatGPT, for instance, wrote a correction to my labeling the LA Riots as riots, “Here’s what triggered the 2025 ‘LA Riots’ (really protests that erupted into unrest) … “
However, we now know these riots were always riots, from the start, intended to produce sympathy from the American public after the law is sent in to rightly arrest, detain, and put down the insurrection. Leftists are using these AI terror machines to “justify” the violent actions they are taking, using ChatGPT quotes to “rebuke” basic statements of fact.
C. WE KNOW IT’S ASTROTURFED
These planned acts of terror are coordinated and funded by leftist organizations, all with DEEP ties to the DNC, working in collusion directly with them in many instances. Here are a few examples:
From American Greatness:
The House Committee on Oversight and Reform is about to focus its investigative powers on Neville Roy Singham, the pro-China Marxist multimillionaire behind many of the destructive far-left demonstrations plaguing the United States in recent years.
The Committee is reportedly issuing a formal document request to Singham over his alleged financial support of the Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL), an extremist Marxist group that has been helping to organize violent anti-ICE riots in Los Angeles and elsewhere.
As the main funder of The People’s Forum, Singham, 71, has also bankrolled the “Free Palestine” protests that erupted after 1,400 innocent Israelis were slaughtered by Hamas on October 7, 2023. The People’s Forum works closely with other organizations in Singham’s network, including PSL and the ANSWER Coalition, all of which have been involved in the anti-Israel protests and anti-ICE riots.
Donald Trump is telegraphing to the world that this is a paid, coordinated terrorist attack. These are not and have never been peaceful protests, despite the agit prop the engines of terror, DNC-programmed AI like Grok and ChatGPT, tell you.
Speaking to reporters on June 10, 4 days after the insurrection began, he said, “…by having the military, it de-escalates. These people are agitators, they’re troublemakers, I believe many of them are paid. I watched them breaking up the sidewalks with a big hammer, handing pieces of the concrete to other people.”
We will have far more on this in the follow-up report, should events warrant it (and they most likely will).
D. DEMOCRATS OPENLY SUPPORT INSURRECTION
But it’s not only the press and their AI terror machines; it’s also Democrats in government, elected Democrats like insurrectionist representative Nanette Barragan (D-CA), who spread the lie these were “mostly peaceful” protests inflamed by Federal agents. This, again, is a known lie intentionally told to get ICE agents killed. She accused those same agents of “targeting peaceful protesters.”
1. FORMER VP GOES INSURRECTIONIST– Kamala Harris, who might as well be an AI program, fueled violent rage amongst her brownshirt stormtroopers. She openly and knowingly lied to the American public, claiming Trump was “stoking fear,” and saying “the demonstration in defense of our immigrant neighbors have been overwhelmingly peaceful.”
The most recent Presidential candidate of the DNC just openly committed acts of treason and terror against the republic, yet she remains free to this day in part because of the Bondi effect, the presence of compromised collusionists and leftist agent, Pam Bondi, the feckless Attorney General of the United States.
2. KAREN BASS TREASON – Perhaps the most damning is the actions of Marxist LA Mayor Karen Bass (we did a report on her Marxist past in a previous MIA). She DEMANDED ICE agents stop their operations and characterized their actions as unconstitutional, as being a violation of states’ rights (as if states have a right to unleash terrorists on the people and prevent them from defending themselves against said terrorists).
She then committed high acts of treason and terrorism, knowingly spreading the violence-inciting lie that ICE agents were to blame for the violence. She said, “If immigration raids had not happened here, we would not have the disorder. It is peaceful now (it wasn’t, riots were going on AS she shared this statement), but we do not know where and when the next raids will be!”
Again, she is free because Pam Bondi, a compromised woman, a traitor herself, is the Attorney General, holding the line for her DNC bosses.
3, GAVIN NEWSOM NUKES AMERICA– Karen Bass’s betrayal of Americans in her city is bad enough, but what about the governor of the state? That governor is another insurrectionist, Gavin Newsom, the man who signed a bill into law that makes it illegal for parents to prevent their children from being chemically castrated if a pedophile teacher grooms them to think they’re in the wrong body.
That “law” alone should get every politician arrested, charged, and convicted of child endangerment and child grooming, to start.
Newsome’s response to the justified putting down of insurrectionist terror was to threaten to essentially leave the Union. He declared, “Californians pay the bills for the federal government. We pay over $80 billion more in taxes than we get back. Maybe it’s time to cut that off, @realDonaldTrump.”
Again, because Pam Bondi, a compromised woman, a traitor, is the DA, Gavin Newsom has not been arrested for openly rebelling against the republic and threatening insurrection at a state-wide scale.
For the record, Border Czar Tom Homan has denied that either Bass or Newsom have crossed the line. I sense he knows they did, but Bondi is holding him back.
4. DNC HOUSE LEADER’S DEATH THREATS TO ICE – The cherry on top of all of this, though, is the response from Hakeem Jeffries, who openly threatened, or rather PROMISED, to dox every ICE agent and bring them to account for obeying the law and defending the republic from its current number one existential threat and insurrectionist enemy from within, the Democratic Party.
He declared, “This is not the Soviet Union. We’re not behind the Iron Curtain. This is not the 1930s, and every single one of them, no matter what it takes, no matter how long it takes, will, of course, be identified. That, in fact, is the law.”
He is essentially threatening not only to murder ICE agents, but he’s also threatening their families as well. Pam Bondi, meanwhile, is busy throwing more Epstein evidence into the bonfire under her desk.
The Democrats’ Hispanic Caucus officially tweeted their support of those acts of high treason in collusion with America’s foreign enemies, tweeting out, “We are keeping tabs, and we will have accountability” in response to the death threats made by the Democrats’ top person in the U.S. House.
PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS
We started off with a zeitgeist-changing image of a working-class Mom (who happens to be black) being blocked from being able to provide for her daughter because entitled white people decided the immigrant child was more important than the American child.
What is playing out here is a fundamental paradigm shift from the left’s previously dominant one. That paradigm framed “truth” through the lens of arguably born traits, like being white, heterosexual, transgendered, black, etc.
The merits of the claims of conflicting parties were based on the status of the characteristics you were ostensibly born with (race, gender, sexual orientation) as well as the status of the nation you represent, with “Americanism” being the paradigm of evil, an indefensible evil born from white supremacism.
If you were black and defended Americanism, you were an Uncle Tom, White Adjacent, and, as Joe Biden claimed about blacks who didn’t vote for him, “you ain’t black.”
While the left has LONG been betraying American workers, its brand was still that it was the party of the people, the party of the workers, a lie that has been accepted long after it had any semblance of truth to it.
The “good guy” brand of the DNC was unshakeable, especially because their information terror machines, the criminal press, continued to spread lies that defended the party and concealed the truth that indicted it.
Now, with the intentional invasion of America by the DNC-CCP using foreign agents as their proxies, it is becoming increasingly difficult to deny what’s going on, not only because the information terror machines are losing their influence but because more and more Americans are encountering the brutal reality of the planvasion where they live, ESPECIALLY in the cities, the DNC’s own base.
Whatever coercive power the left can conjure to slow down their demise, it won’t, in the end, be enough to sustain the growing fury Americans are experiencing every day, especially the ones who were recently still voting Democrat, still believing this was not the party of the rich elites willingly murdering and destroying American agency not for the good of the working poor or middle class, but for the good of the elites who simple don’t want to compete with Americans anymore.
When the white man in the ICE protest video scoffed at the notion of being troubled that he might stop a black woman from going to “work,” the Democrat party died. They never cared about minorities, they never cared about the homosexuals, they could give two figs what happens to illegal immigrants, they only want to MANIPULATE psychopaths to get them to do their violent bidding, only to be discarded as well once they serve their purpose.
Hitler purged his nation of the very people that made it possible, the violent brown shirt thugs. He knew who the most psychotic and dangerous people were, the kind of people you first need to inspire to get them to murder your way to the top of the mountain. This lot will do the same thing. They will then be cut off because their handlers know when they’re done with the mutual enemies, the Americans, these same psychos will then turn on their handlers.
Perhaps, after this, some of those brown shirts will realize they are fighting against their own self-agency, surrendering their lives to child-sacrificing death cultists who feel as much contempt for them as they do for the Americans they’ve tricked them into hating and brutally assaulting.
Chaos may yet come. Disorder and disruption might be coming, but the war for the hearts and minds of Americans is over. You’ve taken our sacred elements, our flag, our name, our institutions, and you treated them like your playthings, like King Belshazzar did when he took God’s temple’s objects and used them as common wine glasses and playthings (Daniel 5).
Perhaps the Democrats should heed the warning Belshazzar received when he saw the writing on the wall, “MENE, MENE, TEKEL, and PARSIN.”
You have been measured and found wanting. Your Kingdom will be taken from you.
The question is, what will replace it? Will America be restored, or will one tyranny be replaced with another? As of right now, I’m betting on America, but the odds are still against overcoming the damage the left has done to this nation, beginning with the “Progressive Era.”
One thing for sure is this: America has learned it cannot be tolerant of intolerance. Tolerance is not acceptance; it’s an acceptance of your right to be wrong without violent consequences, not an acquiescence to your beliefs and ways (as the Democrats these past few decades have tried to make it, in open sedition against individual liberty American values).
Tolerance also doesn’t mean you stop speaking openly in opposition to others’ beliefs and ways. It just means you won’t try to destroy their lives because you disagree with them. But if your beliefs do not allow tolerance, then your beliefs should not be tolerated.
Leftism is an ideology that assumes the social is the only real, and there is an ideal that social experts can discover, an ideal social that justifies violence against wrongthink for the good of the whole.
It is anathema to Americanism, which is rooted in the idea that individuals have a right to be self-stewards of their own pursuit of their own defined happiness so long as they respect the rights of others to do the same. Leftism can never tolerate Americanism, for its lies are destroyed every time in any society that can openly challenge them. It can’t even deny the truth that a female adult human is a woman, and NO ONE ELSE IS!
The emerging question must be, what do we do about the left without destroying the self-stewardship rights of others? We cannot tolerate their intolerance, but how do we determine exactly what ideas are intolerant?
If America survives, it will be left to the next generation to test and work out how the republic can criminalize intolerant thought without criminalizing tolerant thought as well.
FUTHER RESOURCES:
The Color Revolutions – Lincoln A. Mitchell
The History and Science of Color Revolutions – Brandon Turbeville
After the Color Revolutions – Daliborka Jankovic
By Michael A. Cessna, Military Affairs Correspondent
Originally published March 14, 2025 for our Mid-Month Issue of Mindful Intelligence Advisor. Subscribe to get semi-monthly issues.
“If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world.” – J.R.R. Tolkien
INTRODUCTION
Something is stirring in Central Africa. A new power may be rising, one that could upset both world markets and world security, in a realm where Western governments cannot operate, for strategic, tactical, and “optical” reasons.
Upon Donald Trump’s ascension to power, he swiftly engaged in upending the rancid underbelly of the “Deep State.” Trump has become the now-hardened politician – a man openly looking for payback for the last four years of viciously deranged invective inflicted upon him and his family.
Yet even in that turmoil, another tempest churns, this one in Africa. The already-embattled President now faces a set of potential economic and foreign policy disasters left to fester by his predecessors.
In brief: Trump and the United States may be facing a mortal economic threat. How he weathers this minefield will almost certainly chart the course of the next few decades.
A. THE CURRENT SITUATION
Late last year, fighting suddenly surged in the Democratic Republic of the Congo’s (DRC) North Kivu Province, as the M23 rebel group – displaying a previously unseen level of competence, equipment, and training – stormed into the remote province with a focused intensity not seen in the region in at least twenty years.
By the waning days of January, M23 rebels had smashed DRC forces in the area and captured the major city of Goma on the 25th. This also resulted in M23’s capture of nearly three hundred mercenaries, mostly from Romania – a capture of mercenaries on a scale not seen since the 1960s – who were eventually repatriated without too much trouble.
Also laid bare, was the open support of the M23 rebels by the nation of Rwanda. With Rwanda’s open support to M23, including deploying actual Rwandan Army troops on the ground in North Kivu, no one is taking Rwandan denials of direct involvement with any seriousness.
Since the genocide of the 1990s, Rwanda – led by its President, Paul Kagame – has remade itself into an economic power in the region, becoming one of the strongest economies in Central Africa, if not the entire continent. At the same time, Rwanda has rebuilt its military into a force to be both envied and feared.
Rwandan forces have taken the lead in the last ten years with the United Nation’s peacekeeping efforts throughout the world but especially in Africa, where it was Rwandan troops who helped to stabilize the Cabo Delgado insurgency in Mozambique.
Now, however, the tiger ostensibly built for peace seems rather to be devouring the steak that is the disorganized and perpetually impoverished region of the eastern Congo.
But they are not doing so alone.
B. CENTRAL AFRICA
Central Africa is defined as that region around the “Great Lakes” – comprised of Lakes Victoria, Tanganyika, Malawi, Turkana, Albert, Kivu, and Edward. It is one of the most mineral rich regions on Earth. Yet, it is also one the most grindingly poor regions, economically speaking.
For the most part, this is a consequence of both climate-driven diseases, a chaotic legacy of randomly drawn colonial borders, Africa’s terrible river systems, and the realpolitik of corporations and nations liberally spreading money and weapons to all takers in trade for the real gold of the modern world: rare earths.
It turns out “rare earth metals” are at the heart of the bloody history of the region. The mining combines of the mid- to late-twentieth century were concerned about minerals like iron, copper and uranium, in addition to the more mundane gold and diamonds.
With the rise of the high-tech computer industries that began in the 1980s, these operations refocused on crucial – and highly exotic – minerals like coltan, cobalt and lithium, among many others. From handheld smartphones to lithium-ion batteries, these exotic materials are the foundations of the modern world, at least in the West.
This mineral wealth, however, comes at a high cost.
The human rights abuses involved in how minerals are extracted in the Congo Basin are legendary. “Slavery” is simply too weak a word to describe the very-real situation on the ground. Rwanda (and more importantly, Uganda) has been happy to maintain that status quo, despite their public positions.
This brings us to the “silent partner” in the fighting: Uganda.
C. PROTO-RWANDA (UGANDA) REENTERS THE CHAT
Uganda’s journey from the devastation of Idi Amin’s rule to its current position as a regional power presents a compelling parallel to Rwanda’s more recent transformation, establishing a pattern that might be termed the “East African recovery model.”
- AFTER THE COLLAPSE – Following the overthrow of Amin in 1979 and the subsequent turbulent Milton Obote period, Uganda faced catastrophic economic collapse, with GDP having fallen by 40% and infrastructure in ruins. When Yoweri Museveni’s National Resistance Movement seized power in 1986, the country stood as a textbook failed state.
Museveni’s initial approach prioritized stability through a combination of military consolidation and pragmatic economic liberalization. By establishing firm control over the security apparatus, while simultaneously courting Western donors and international financial institutions, Uganda secured the breathing room needed for recovery.
- THE NEXT STAGE, THE DUAL TRACK APPROACH – The 1990s saw Uganda adopt structural adjustment programs that, while controversial, helped stabilize inflation and establish the foundations for growth, a situation that continues today.
This dual-track approach of internal security control paired with external economic engagement would later become a blueprint for Paul Kagame in post-genocide Rwanda.
Uganda’s economic recovery was remarkable in context. From 1992 to 2010, GDP growth averaged 7% annually, poverty rates declined from 56% to approximately 25%, and infrastructure – particularly in Kampala – saw significant improvements.
The government cultivated strong relationships with both Western donors and, increasingly, Chinese investors, playing potential partners against each other to maximize development assistance while minimizing political concessions.
This economic revival occurred alongside careful management of internal political dynamics. Museveni maintained power through a hybrid system that combined democratic formalities with authoritarian practices.
The government tolerated limited opposition, permitted a relatively free press, and held regular elections while ensuring none of these threatened central control. This approach of “managed democracy” created sufficient political stability for economic development while preventing the emergence of serious challengers to the regime – another model later adopted by Rwanda.
- BECOMING AN INFLUENCER – Uganda’s approach to regional security similarly presaged Rwanda’s later strategies. Museveni used both conventional military power and proxy forces to secure Uganda’s interests in neighboring countries, most notably in eastern DRC during the First and Second Congo Wars.
This now appears to be a pattern apparently repeating itself in the open in South Sudan as of the 11th of March. These interventions, while moderately justifiable on security grounds, also secured access to valuable mineral resources that supplemented the formal economy.
D. BECOMING KEIRETSU
- RWANDA EMERGES – The parallels between Rwanda’s subsequent development and Uganda’s are striking. Both countries emerged from catastrophic violence to achieve notable economic growth under strongman leadership. Both maintained tight internal security control while presenting a reform-oriented face to international donors.
Both developed sophisticated strategies for regional power projection that blended formal and informal mechanisms. And both cultivated international partners across ideological lines, pragmatically engaging with Western democracies, China, and regional organizations simultaneously.
Where the two models diverge is in scale and efficiency. Rwanda, under Kagame, has implemented a more disciplined and centralized version of the Ugandan model, achieving greater administrative effectiveness and lower corruption.
While Uganda pioneered the approach of combining authoritarian stability with economic liberalization, Rwanda has refined it into a more coherent system that has delivered more consistent results, particularly in public service delivery and economic planning.
- THE RARE EARTH ALLURE – As both countries now eye the mineral wealth of eastern DRC, Uganda stands as both predecessor and partner, backed up by “boots on the ground,” to Rwanda’s ambitions – a prototype that demonstrated the possibility of post-conflict transformation while establishing many of the regional dynamics that continue to shape East Africa’s security landscape.
- THE RAINBOW CRISIS – However, the foregoing is complicated by the LGBT+ question. Uganda has stated, pointedly and repeatedly, its hard-line stance against homosexuality. In this, Uganda pointedly rejected U.S.-led calls to repeal its hardcore stance against homosexuality, despite sanctions being imposed upon the country for its stance.
In this, lays the genesis of the current danger: Using Rwanda to take the lead, Ugandan leader Yoweri Museveni seems to be partnering with Paul Kagame to grind down on the West, by establishing a hard lock on controlling the Central African rare earths market.
In effect, Rwanda and Uganda are about to establish a kind of “sovereign keiretsu” in Africa’s Central Lakes region.
THE “PROMISING” FUTURE OF THE NEW KEIRETSU
- WHAT IS A KEIRETSU? – In the original Japanese, a “keiretsu” is a series of interlocking corporate relationships where the individual companies are usually unconnected – and not competing against each other – in the wider market.
While a keiretsu is typically corporate in nature, what is emerging in Central Africa is a keiretsu formed by sovereign states – not an open series of treaties, but an “understanding” between leaders on how to act in concert, for both strategic and business purposes.
- GHOST ALLIANCE – Rwanda and Uganda’s potential formation of a coordinated “ghost” economic-military alliance to dominate rare earth elements (REEs) in Central Africa represents a significant evolution in resource geopolitics with far-reaching implications. This emerging dynamic centers on the eastern region of the DRC, where Rwanda has already leveraged its support of its M23 rebel proxy group to secure influence over North Kivu’s vast mineral-rich territories.
The strategic calculus behind such a partnership lies in combining Rwanda’s established proxy networks and military effectiveness with Uganda’s greater economic infrastructure and international connections. Both nations possess experienced militaries with regional projection capabilities and histories of involvement in DRC’s resource extraction.
Their potential “keiretsu” arrangement would create a more formalized structure for resource extraction, processing, and export while maintaining plausible deniability regarding direct territorial control.
- M23 REBEL GROUP – The military proxy the alliance could use centers on the M23 rebel group, which reemerged in 2021 after nearly a decade of relative inactivity. Multiple UN reports have documented Rwandan direct support, including provision of advanced weapons, command elements, and territorial sanctuary.
M23’s operations have specifically focused on mineral-rich territories in North Kivu province, suggesting resource acquisition as a primary objective rather than broader political aims. Uganda’s military could provide complementary capabilities, particularly in logistics and broader territorial control.
- THE EASTERN DRC – The eastern DRC contains significant deposits of tantalum, cobalt, coltan, and other critical minerals essential for advanced technology manufacturing. While precise geological surveys remain incomplete due to ongoing instability, the region holds an estimated 70% of the world’s coltan and substantial reserves of other rare earths. These deposits have historically been exploited through artisanal mining without comprehensive geological mapping, suggesting their true value may exceed current estimates.
- THE RARE EARTH PRIZE – The economic implications extend far beyond Central Africa. The global rare earths market, currently dominated by China (which controls approximately 85% of processing capacity), has become increasingly strategic as nations seek supply chain security for critical technologies.
A Rwanda-Uganda alliance could position itself as an alternative supply source for Western markets eager to diversify away from Chinese dependence. However, unlike Australia or Canada’s developing rare earth sectors, this Central African supply would come with significant ethical complications.
For Rwanda’s President Kagame, this strategy represents a potential economic transformation for his landlocked nation. Rwanda’s economy, while showing impressive growth rates, lacks natural resources and remains vulnerable to international aid fluctuations.
Control over DRC’s mineral wealth would provide a sustainable revenue stream independent of Western donor priorities. Uganda’s President Museveni similarly faces economic pressure to develop new growth engines as his country struggles with debt and needs to capitalize on recent oil discoveries.
PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS
International reactions have been mixed, confused, and often contradictory. Western nations have issued diplomatic condemnations while continuing economic partnerships with both countries. China has maintained its own resource extraction agreements with DRC’s central government while pragmatically engaging with Rwanda.
The African Union and regional bodies like the East African Community have initiated peace processes that have yet to address the fundamental resource competition driving the conflict.
The broader geopolitical implications are potentially transformative for global technology supply chains. Western technology manufacturers, from defense contractors to consumer electronics companies, face increasing pressure to secure non-Chinese rare earth supplies while also adhering to conflicting mineral regulations.
A Rwanda-Uganda alliance could position itself as a “managed” source of these materials – more formalized than current conflict mineral networks but without the environmental and labor standards of Western producers.
For DRC and its citizens, the stakes are existential. The country has lost an estimated $4-8 billion annually to illicit resource extraction for decades, funds that could transform its development trajectory. The environmental consequences have been similarly severe, with unregulated mining causing widespread deforestation and water contamination.
This emerging resource competition represents the evolution of what some analysts have termed “hybrid resource colonialism” – utilizing proxy forces and economic pressure rather than direct occupation to secure vital materials.
As global demand for rare earths continues to grow with the expansion of renewable energy and advanced computing, the strategic value of controlling these resources will only increase, potentially cementing a new form of resource competition in one of Africa’s most volatile regions.
The question, however, is “Why?” These are highly aggressive moves for both countries to take. The answer is painfully simple.
Sub-Saharan Africa is fed up with the patronizing and moralizing attitude of Western countries – including the United States – who need their natural resources, but who insist on trying to moralize on how the African states’ attitudes need to conform to what the Western countries want…and when moralizing doesn’t work, resorting to bribery to rig elections.
While this sort of thing has worked in the past, the tables began to turn about ten years ago. Starting in the Sahel region, a series of coups d’états eventually led to the near-total withdrawal of France from its long-held spheres of colonial influence.
Yoweri Museveni – long a very keen observer of the West – smelled weakness, as did Paul Kagame…and what both men realized, was that this strategy could be adapted for their own use.
One of the glaring revelations exposed by the 2023 coup in Niger, was that Western states can no longer simply “invade” most Sub-Saharan countries. This is a result of not only strategic military weakness, but it also comes from the hard fact that no Western government can survive the image of mostly white military forces attacking Black African nations.
Certainly, Western states can send in “military assistance teams” to try and aid a nation’s military, and can usually send in small, temporary forces to rescue embassy staff when a nation “goes pear-shaped.”
But they cannot invade and conquer a Black nation, anymore, as the Western states’ own electorates absolutely will not tolerate such an action. This is the real calculus factor that both Museveni and Kagame understand. Their “unofficially official” alliance can grab certain swaths of terrain, take control of resource extraction in those areas – and Western states will have to comply.
In the case of rare earths, the West has no choice but to bend the knee: With Communist China directly supplying some 70% of the world’s supply of these minerals, and processing some 90% of global output – without which, most modern electronics technology cannot function – Western states absolutely need other sources…and the West’s old model of paternalistic attitudes to the non-Chinese regions of the world who supply rare earths have handed leaders like Museveni and Kagame all the moral justification they require.
Prices in tech are about to rise significantly, and there is very little that the new administration can do about it.
FURTHER RESOURCES
The Congo: From Leopold to Kabila: A People’s History – Georges Nzongola-Nataja
Rwanda: History and Hope – Margee M. Ensign and William E. Bertrand
Rwanda History: Learn About the Tragic Consequence of Rwanda – Alexander Fricks
The History of Uganda: From Ancient Legends to Modern Wonders – Angie Ngabo-Baker
By Bill Collier, Publisher
Originally published March 14, 2025 for our Mid-Month Issue of Mindful Intelligence Advisor. Subscribe to get semi-monthly issues.
“… I look at the Democrats in front of me, and I realize there is absolutely nothing I can say to make them happy or to make them stand or smile or applaud. Nothing I can do. I could find a cure to the most devastating disease – a disease that would wipe out entire nations or announce the answers to the greatest economy in history or the stoppage of crime to the lowest levels ever recorded, and these people sitting right here will not clap, will not stand, and certainly will not cheer for these astronomical achievements. They won’t do it no matter what.” –President Donald J Trump, from his 5th joint sessions address
INTRODUCTION
For our older readers, there will be a strong reaction to the phrase “New World Order” that, for many, signifies a blatant betrayal of American national sovereignty in favor of a corrupt ruling class in the political and corporate world. When the first Bush invoked those words, Republicans and Democrats both pursued what amounted to an anti-American agenda that weakened our economy, our well-being, and, of course, our country’s independence.
The many wars we fought proved to be outlandish failures, and the fears invoked to justify them often proved to be exaggerations or lies. The “War On Terror” justified the surveillance state and shocking violations of the Bill of Rights that still persist (including the further empowering of a FISA court that would be politically weaponized against our current President through the Orwellian-termed act, “The Patriot Act”).
In many ways, both the things Trump said in this speech and that the Democratic Party said in response with their desperate, uncivil and unprofessional behavior felt more like a raucous briefing from the frontline of a revolution against that very same world disorder of their “rules based international order” which is far worse than we could have imagined. It was as if Trump was on the front, proclaiming the demise of the enemy before him who were shooting back at him as he spoke.
While Democrats fumed with their truthless little paddles and outbursts, Trump detailed blow after blow, thanks to DOGE and administrative efforts to root out fraud and abuse. We are finding that BILLIONS of taxpayer dollars went into the treasury and out in an intentionally underhanded way to funnel our money into the hands of NWO revolutionary organizations, almost all being identified as on the left. NWO moles within the government illegally facilitated this and covered it up for decades, while making themselves rich.
The left versus right divide has some relevance, but the deeper delineation could be seen as being more authoritarian versus less and being more for local and private autonomy from the state versus wanting a global hegemonic power that essentially dictates to every person how to live. It is simply authoritarianism versus freedomism and localist decentralization versus global hegemonic centralization.
A. THE TENOR
Many will detail the elements of the speech, blow by blow, but the tenor of the speech was simple: Trump and his team are going to dismantle the funding and organizational superstructure of the “New World Order,” and as for the “rules based international order,” it is toast. This also includes Trump’s team, who identified the illegal funneling of tax dollars to fund Democratic and establishment GOP candidates as well as their causes, which are not authorized by Congress and are therefore fraudulent and illegal.
B. THE MIXED REGIME STRATEGY
The last almost 40 years at least have been a story of the NWO crowd trying to basically transform this country into a “mixed regime.”
A mixed regime is a hybrid of authoritarianism and democracy; basically, the people have limited choices as per the establishment’s rules (see Romania and how a candidate was disqualified from running). The Germans justify their own authoritarianism by pretending they are creating a firewall for democracy by excluding millions of voters from choosing a different path than the NWO crowd desires Germany to take.
To facilitate a mixed regime system in the U.S., the NWO crowd’s entertainment, news, education, and web industry all suppressed dissent from “the message,” which was set from the top and center by the likes of the Soros family and the top leaders of the Uniparty establishment.
Their brief was to press every person into service for their benefit and enrichment, suppress dissent or truth to keep everyone in line, and punish or cancel those who refused to bow.
Their efforts against Trump and his supporters have been totalitarian in spirit and illegal in action. Their goal was to kill Trump, probably because he knows it. He also seems to have a good bead on who and what they really are: corrupt people led by doctrines of hell whose every belief is essentially an analog for demons. The lawfare and Judgefare waged through corrupt courts with corrupt lawyers (all deserving of serious prison time) have failed in their aim.
We, the Editor Paul Gordon Collier and myself, have a dear friend, Andy Badolato, who was, in our opinion, a victim of this lawfare: he lost everything and served prison time for something I personally believe was a setup, which is a very long story we might one day share here.
The point is that the NWO crowd went after thousands of people, including my friend Andy, for spurious reasons and under the flimsiest of technicalities, while they themselves were wantonly breaking laws in open defiance of the Bill of Rights. This has all been done ONLY to enrich themselves and grow their powers at the expense of your rights and well-being.
All that failed; Trump is in charge, and he now has access to the proof of their decades-long criminal and treasonous conspiracies against these United States of America.
C. THE END OF “RULES-BASED?”
The fear and rage, the nonsensical claims of being “literally Hitler,” are all predictable as Team Trump gores every sacred cow of the left, while, through DOGE, Team Trump is stripping the theft of hundreds of billions of dollars from the NWO, tax-payer-sponsored, crowd.
The NWO crowd shakes in fear as they speak of their “rules-based international order” as if it is sacred and holy. We Americans believe in “Rule of Law,” that is, in using the constitutional guidelines to bind government power, but “Rules-based” is really globalist limitations placed on other countries’ foreign policies to assure that the NWO, the “Global Order” stays firmly entrenched in power, to the detriment of the sovereignty of the nations captured by these perverse, anti-sovereign-state standards.
Trump is discarding it, even making fun of it, and this speech was no different. He destroyed their fake ethics and moral superiority complexes with brutal truth: every country who screws the USA over will be punished in some way and our only friends are those who show themselves friendly.
The EU and NATO countries have long enjoyed us paying to defend them with our own forces while both use NWO moles to funnel money to their organizations. They do this under the guise of being the moral betters of America. Trump’s speech was stark in how he discarded their pretend alliances and loyalty, as if NATO’s needs and wants come before America’s interests.
It is surprising that Trump didn’t invoke George Washington, who spoke against permanent entangling alliances. His concern seems to have been that Americans could be compelled to support things that go against our interests to please our allies.
But while Trump didn’t invoke Washington, his speech was certainly more akin to what Washington would have said than any President since, well, perhaps since Washington himself.
The NWO crowd are all trembling in fear, but still are not vanquished and are still capable of inflicting harm on their enemies, especially as Trump, Musk, JD Vance, RFK Jr, Pam Bondi, and the rest of Trump’s growing army continues its own merciless onslaught.
The NWO crowd, including the leaders and the people who have bought into the fake public “religion” of the New World Order, are all enraged and on the war path.
D. THE FAILED CULTURE OF TOTALITARIANS ON DISPLAY
What we saw in Trump’s speech, in combination with the numerous low-class disruptions by the DNC, was the agony of totalitarians who failed in their ultimate goals and are now watching decades of subversive work to destroy our Constitution go down in flames.
This continues on as DOGE and the new leadership simply audit for fraud and abuse. The NWO crowd, including groups like their paid pro-abortion, wokist lunacy, climate change hoaxers, and pro Hamas terrorists (who remain protected by Soros DAs still refusing to prosecute them), are apoplectic.
For decades, they patiently labored and plotted, plotted and labored before they finally succeeded in subverting every institution, including government at all levels. More importantly, this also includes the means of cultural production, the press, the media, education, etc. Now, things are turning against them, and they’re turning against them, as Donald Trump would say, “Bigly!”
Trump’s tone and method were far from conventional, and he has consistently been an iconoclast to the “Federal culture” that permeates both those inside government and those whose work involves anything political.
Every group of people has some sort of cultural norms and standards, including the government and everyone engaging in politics. The Federal culture that once dominated everyone’s thinking and rules of conduct has been questioned and may be changing.
Those changes will optimally make it harder for NWO subversives to ever regain their shadow-state hijacking of Federal power and wealth, effectively turning this country into an NWO satellite of some international entity like the WEF or the UN.
E. THE DECORUM DILEMA THAT IS NOT A DILEMA AT ALL
Trump’s decorum was and will remain rather shocking at times. When I was the public face for a newspaper and ranted on social media, my partners asked if I was a professional newspaper publisher or an angry blogger. While at the time I was offended, it stuck with me, and I came to see that they were right and that decorum matters.
But Trump doesn’t have decorum like I think a President should.
Why does Trump have a massive loyal following when he seems to lack the decorum one thinks is necessary to create such a loyal following? The answer is based on the truth that every task in every place and time must be suited in its design, functions, and ergonomics both to the task and to the person or people who will use it.
Trump fits millions of people who needed to have someone who was truly and demonstrably disloyal to the establishment, his lack of conventional decorum being a most visible sign. The work of dismantling as much of the NWO infrastructure as possible that has burrowed itself into the Federal government requires a tool, a President in this case, who has no love for the “New World Order” and its inhumane agendas.
Thus, Trump fits the American voters who desire a forward advancement of freedom after decades of the NWO’s war on freedom from within our own government by corrupt people whose soul has been sold, figuratively speaking.
While Trump’s slogan is “Make America Great Again,” his agenda, if it succeeds, will advance freedom and economic opportunities for every person and people group and every household and neighborhood as has never been seen before. His slogan could have been, “Advance Freedom and Abundance for ALL Americans!”
F. RESTORING AMERICA’S SPIRIT
MAGA, in my mind, isn’t really about restoring America to the past. The idea is more about restoring the spirit of America that overcame prejudice and many flaws and sins, including the Trail of Tears. Through all these shortcomings and sins, we can see an arc of history bending not only toward justice, but toward a life of freedom and abundance being accessible to every American who works for it, AND with public help for those who cannot work or find work.
MAGA doesn’t want America to go back and repeat the same sins and mistakes. What is driving many in this movement, even subconsciously, is the desire to restore America’s moral and legal justifications for its existence.
The idea is to lift again the fallen mantle of America’s God-given scroll of destiny and purpose, which is the arc of our history ever-bending towards this vision of freedom and abundance for all Americans. The closer we walk towards that future the further we walk from the patterns of our past (and even current) mistakes, sins, and bad ideas.
The spirit of what President Trump said (which also represents what I see as the spirit of MAGA), is to restore America’s true manifest destiny as a commonwealth of freedom. The spirit of America is to be the cradle of freedom civilizations that will purge the alien and seditious NWO conspirators from within that waged war on freedom and prosperity every day.
Blow after blow fell from Trump’s mouth as horrified NWO minions gasped from within but outwardly, dishonestly, they aped righteous anger over his preachments!
NO MORE illegal aliens.
NO MORE election fraud.
NO MORE grooming kids to make them mentally ill with evil doctrines.
NO MORE taxpayer dollars going to organizations who are dedicated to destroying our Constitutional Union of free and sovereign states and diverse national people groups.
NO MORE U.S. money to international organizations who are working to bring the NWO agenda to many lands as part of a global empire of tyranny.
Over and over, Trump gored their ox and lifted the hope of millions of Americans who truly believe Trump is one of, if not the most, populist Presidents who is inspired and driven by his love for the people.
The fact he speaks their language and genuinely seems to try and deliver on his promises makes people feel he represents THEIR interests and not the interests of the globalist, NWO elites.
History will, in time, tell if indeed Trump lives up to this narrative, but for now it is a narrative many believe and which Trump seems to be basing his Presidency on, something that almost no President has ever done.
G. ONLY TRUMP WILL DO?
It has been said that the world rarely needs a General George S. Patton, but when the need is there, only a Patton will do. Trump’s outlandishness, bragging, and even rudeness seen in this speech certainly grates on people who wish for decorum, but this, along with his “exaggerations” (which his followers seem to receive as rhetorical flourish and “creative license,” not facts), is probably exactly what is needed at this time.
While Trump didn’t use the terms “New World Order,” “NWO Crowd,” or “NWO establishment,” and neither do the bad guys we call NWO minions or ruling class, he yet may lay waste to their kingdom.
His words are usually met with actions, unless they are part of negotiations meant to make his negotiating position stronger. Thus, when he says he will root out the illegal use of our country’s tax revenues for purposes not intended by Congress (in open defiance of America’s constitutionally-based Rule of Law), he means it.
So far, the NWO crowd can only shake and gyrate with nonsensical rhetoric in desperation to stop this assault on their source of power and wealth, embezzling tax revenues from the governments of the world.
H. THE NWO PRESS
The narrative used to be that uber-rich billionaires spent their money to help their preferred candidates and policies “win” by any means necessary, including mass information indoctrination and election fraud.
The fact the media are often running a deficit made people ask why they were still in business and who was funding them. The fact many corporations enact unpopular policies, lose customers, and stay in business had people asking who was bankrolling them.
The idea here was that every major corporation, as well as every educational, news, information, and entertainment institution, and the courts, as well as the bureaucracy, could enact policies and produce content meant to deceive and control the masses, turning them into NWO minions or mindless atomized drones.
These institutions would at times lose popularity and support, but we all assumed these billionaires at the top of the NWO cabal sustained the private institutions while our tax dollars went to the government. It turns out these institutions are all funded by tax dollars.
These “billionaire moles” eventually became the super majority within the bureaucracy. They worked as liaisons with private entities (corporations) to enable the government to use private entities to do things to you that otherwise would be illegal for government to do, like restricting your free expression. They bribed them with your money to attack your rights.
At this point, though, the line between the state and the state-favored corporation may be gone altogether, though it appears Trump to ends at least one corpostate. Let us hope he isn’t replacing it with another one.
The New York Times remains afloat after decades of fake journalism meant to mask their rancid NWO political agenda and their hatred of liberty, and even decency. That paper should have failed. But Federal money saved it from financial disaster. The NWO Press are all facing major financial woes because Soros types didn’t use their own money to fund them; they stole it from the taxpayers, funneled through layers of NGOs and other entities until Soros himself wrote the check and made himself a kingmaker in the NWO establishment.
Trump has eviscerated the NWO FakePress in many ways, and they continue their libelous attacks on him and his team, but when Trump spoke about the abuse of tax dollars from within the government by moles working with these billionaires, he was sounding the death knell on their subversive insurrection from within our government by traitors.
The NWO crowd didn’t show any respect for the young man who was made an honorary Secret Service agent or the families who lost loved ones to illegal alien killers. While many think this was heartless of them, it is probably their frozen state of fear and rage.
When you are in such a state, it’s hard to engage in rationality, let alone behave in a civil manner with those you perceive and maybe know are dismantling a major aspect of your power and a major source of your wealth.
SUMMARY
The speech was a tour de force of the Trump team’s war on the NWO itself, which is both a domestic and international battle. Our founder, Don McAlvany, knew (and still knows) about the NWO. Indeed, at one time, we were both swimming in the same water (as it were) as I was working with some of the same people and organizations that he was.
It is incredible for older people who have lived for so long under this self-hating regime (which may have started with the first Bush) to see a time when the “NWO” was so challenged at the heart of its power.
The charge is being led by an imperfect man with many flaws and lack of decorum, a man who goes so hard against what we always called the New World Order, using Bush’s own confession that such a thing existed. Not only is he challenging the NWO, he’s WINNING significant victories.
We have never seen the NWO crowd on their back foot, in defense, and even disarray, as now they seem to be. This speech will be remembered as being symbolic of real achievements, as well as being the clarion call to unite against our common foe, the NWO.
Whatever they call themselves or others call them, veterans of this war on freedom often call them the New World Order. What Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum are pushing is still the same NWO agenda first publicized by George Bush the First.
What began in 1989 when the first Bush spoke of a kinder, gentler nation and a New World Order (all nice-sounding words that were a cover for their war AGAINST freedom) has met an existential threat in the person of Donald Trump.
Trump’s speech was salt on the wounds of the NWO crowd because, unlike most such speeches, this one was more about what the President was doing now or has already achieved than just promises and rhetoric meant to entertain.
FURTHER RESOURCES:
The Art of the Deal – Tony Schwartz, Donald Trump
Rise of the New World Order: The Culling of Man – Micha-el Thomas Hays
The Emergence and Role of Nongovernmental Organizations – Lowell J. Gretebeck
The Rise of NGO Activism – Julien Daubanes and Jean-Charles Rochet
Originally published February 28, 2025 for our End-of-Month Issue of Mindful Intelligence Advisor. Subscribe to get semi-monthly issues.
By Paul Gordon Collier, Editor
“All that is necessary for evil to succeed is for good men to do nothing as they must if they believe they can do nothing. There is nothing worse because the council of despair is declaration of irresponsibility; it is Pilate washing his hands.” – Edmund Burke
INTRODUCTION
Keir Starmer, the current openly Marxist, Britain-hating Prime Minister of the UK, is proving to be an existential threat to the children of Britain and to the fate of the country itself. His participation in the enabling of child rape gangs, gangs of Islamists using rape and murder as a form of political manipulation, is clear and, at this point, beyond dispute.
His continued hatred for the British people and their way of life can be seen in how he jumps to protect Islamists from bad opinions while he continues to slander and defame the British people.
In past reports, we have exposed this man’s Marxist roots and his anti-British agenda to turn Britain into a cesspit of Islamist Marxism devoid of the white devil he imagines his own people are (despite the fact that he, too, is a white British man, but not in spirit).
The Free Press has an excellent summary of the albatross continuing to drag this man’s dystopian fantasy down:
The scandal is already reshaping British politics. It’s not just about the heinous nature of the crimes. It’s that every level of the British system is implicated in the cover-up.
Social workers were intimidated into silence. Local police ignored, excused, and even abetted pedophile rapists across dozens of cities. Senior police and Home Office officials deliberately avoided action in the name of maintaining what they called “community relations.” Local councilors and Members of Parliament rejected pleas for help from the parents of raped children. Charities, NGOs, and Labour MPs accused those who discussed the scandal of racism and Islamophobia. The media mostly ignored or downplayed the biggest story of their lifetimes. Zealous in their incuriosity, much of Britain’s media elite remained barnacled to the bubble of Westminster politics and its self-serving priorities.
They did this to defend a failed model of multiculturalism, and to avoid asking hard questions about failures of immigration policy and assimilation. They did this because they were afraid of being called racist or Islamophobic. They did this because Britain’s traditional class snobbery had fused with the new snobbery of political correctness….
What we do know is that the epicenter was the postindustrial mill towns of England’s north and Midlands, where immigrants from Pakistan and Bangladesh settled in the 1960s. White locals say the grooming and rapes began soon after…
The details are established beyond doubt in the small number of prosecutions that eventually made it to court. The suffering described in the court papers is sickening to read: The girls were drugged, beaten, sodomized, gang-raped, trafficked, and tortured.
A. BIGGER THAN STARMER
Keir Starmer is the current front-face of the grooming assault on Britain in the name of Marxism, or globalism, or whatever you want to call it. The problems existed before him and are present in both the Conservative AND Labour Parties, but he is the perpetuator of this violent assault.
From UnHerd:
The statistics behind the rape gang scandal – let’s banish the wholly inadequate word “grooming” – are staggering. For over 25 years, networks of men, predominantly from Pakistani Muslim backgrounds, abused young white girls from Yeovil to London to Glasgow. The victims’ accounts are beyond depravity, unthinkable in a supposedly advanced Western democracy.
That, of course, immediately raises a simple, shocking question: why did British police services turn a blind eye to the gang rape of tens of thousands of young girls?…
The answer, in the end, is simple. Racism, for police services from Chester to Penzance, remains the original sin. From the Scarman Report to the Macpherson Inquiry, the police have long served as Britain’s sin-eaters, devouring social problems on our behalf. As former Met Commissioner Sir Robert Mark famously wrote: “The police are the anvil on which society beats out the problems and abrasions of social inequality, racial prejudice, weak laws and ineffective legislation.”
Compared to the intentional assault on the British people by its own racist, anti-liberty government (under Conservatives OR Labour), the Normans of 1066 were tolerant, peace-loving, freedom-respecting invaders.
B. THE GROOMING
- 2008-2009 ROCHDALE INVESTIGATION – While Keir Starmer served in leadership in the Crown Prosecution Services (CPS), his team decided that a young victim of grooming gangs was “unreliable,” so the case was dismissed, which led to a delay in their prosecution for 3 years before a prosecutor appointed by Starmer, Nazir Afzal, finally charged and prosecuted them. This led to the conviction of 9 men.
What happened during those three years before these men were finally prosecuted? One can only believe that they continued to do what they were doing before they got caught, grooming and raping white English children as a form of jihad against the country that paid their way there and continues to pay to sustain them.
- ROCHDALE GROOMING REIGN – A report from 2014 on the Rochdale grooming gangs shows their sexual assaults on children were at their highest between 1997 and 2013, falling in line with Starmer’s tenure there. It’s almost as if they KNEW they would get a free ride from the anti-English Starmer (who most likely viewed the raping of English children as justice for the raping of the third world by the British Empire).
- STARMER’S NONCE-ENABLING INSTITUTIONALIZATION – Starmer’s opponents believe he created an institutional spirit in CPS that stigmatized any notion of going after Muslim immigrants even if they KNEW (which this writer believes they DID KNOW) the grooming gangs were assaulting children. After all, these children were the children of the white devil who raped the world.
Professor Alexis Jay’s 2022 report on grooming gangs states that the only serious prosecutions of grooming gangs under Starmer were a result of a massive public pushback. Wherever cases were not publicly covered, Starmer’s child-rape-enabling prosecutors continued to sit on their hands.
Starmer’s creation of a pedo-enabling culture and his refusal to change led to the rape of hundreds more children, children Starmer probably views not as victims but as criminals being rightly punished.
C. THE SPIRIT OF GROOMING IN STARMER’S WORLDVIEW
- GROOMING FOR MARXISM IN THEORY – The Marxist left comes from a place where, inherently, they are predisposed to dispose of children and subject them to sexual assault. This spirit emerges from their claim that “systemic racism” is the existential threat to humanity that must be eradicated, by any means necessary, if humanity is to hope to survive. That systemic racism was created by the white devil, who also created heteronormativity, the sexual binary, parents, mother, father, and even the age of consent (ED.NOTE: In America, this list includes the Constitution, ESPECIALLY the Bill of Rights).
In order to rid the world of the white devil’s institutions, it’s not enough to change the laws, the old institutions must die. Children, for instance, must be encouraged to question their sexuality and gender, to BREAK the heteronormative frame and the gender binary construct. This is essential to their worldview, which is that the white devil led humanity astray, led humanity away from its real good, and the only way to return to the real good is to eliminate every institution the white devil created.
The Marxist left doesn’t merely encourage sexual grooming, they practically demand it. Their claim is that children who fit outside the sexual and gender norm will kill themselves unless government agents FORCE CHILDREN to question their sexuality and gender, and the white devil will win, because he uses heteronormativity and the sexual binary to oppress minorities.
In this cultural reality, sacrificing the children of the white devils on the altar of sexual assault is hardly offensive to an ideology that DEMANDS child sex grooming, never mind the fact that the key “founders” of the current iteration of Marxism were open advocates of pedophilia (which we covered in an earlier MIA report).
Destroying the majority for the good of the minority is the far nobler goal. Sure, there may be suffering here or there, and SOME children might be innocent, but overall, society as a whole will only grow closer to human perfection if we destroy the constructs the white devil created and replace them with our own (never mind what they are, to question them is to affirm you’re part of the oppressive majority, the white devil).
- THE UK FACE OF GROOMING FOR MARXISM – Keir Starmer is the poster child for that spirit. Under his watch as a lead prosecutor, Keir Starmer would enable child rape gangs across the UK to victimize more than 10,000 innocent children. His failure, willing or not, to “join the dots” across regions and across multiple victim testimonies protected child rapists and knowingly, willingly put children in danger “for the good of the whole (to end racism, which is to end the white devil, which is to end Britian itself as a construct).”
Starmer is as guilty of the child rapes and murders as the Islamist grooming gangs his office protected (and his current administration is still importing and subsidizing), whenever and wherever it could. The fact that CPS destroyed many records from his reign shows the actions of a guilty man and a guilty department.
Starmer’s defense would be that under his watch, between 2010 and 2011, there was a rise in child sex abuse cases prosecuted, but that was the result of reluctant prosecutions of cases that went public. The proof that this is true is in the fact that the number rose significantly once Starmer left. For instance, in 2016-17, the same CPS office prosecuted nearly twice as many cases as were prosecuted under Starmer’s peak prosecution year.
In other words, the insertion of child rape culture into Britain through state-sponsored “immigration” created a massive spike in child sex assault cases that Starmer’s office couldn’t completely ignore (though they would have if the public hadn’t forced their hand).
D. STARMER’S DEFENSE: KILL FREE SPEECH
Keir Starmer reveals his guilt by his best defense, a defense that seeks to lay the groundwork to criminalize any effort to call Islamists what they are: pedophile murderer-rapists running rampant across the UK on the taxpayer dime.
Elon Musk and others that claimed that Starmer knew about the rape gangs and protected them for two reasons: to curry votes with the England-hating subsidized Muslim community and to punish the English for having a world empire that, according to these deranged lunatics, did nothing but rape the lands, as well as the noble people of those lands.
In answering these accusations, Starmer said, “Those that are spreading lies and misinformation as far and wide as possible are not interested in victims, they’re interested in themselves. They are cheerleading Tommy Robinson, a man who went to prison for nearly collapsing a grooming case, a gang grooming case. These people are trying to get some kind of vicarious thrill from street violence, that people like Tommy Robinson promote.”
“Those attacking Jess Phillips, who I’m proud to call a colleague and a friend, are not protecting victims. Jess Phillips has done a thousand times more than they’ve even dreamt about when it comes to protecting victims of sexual abuse throughout her entire career. When the poison of the far right leads to serious threats to Jess Phillips and others, that, in my book, means a line has been crossed. I enjoy the cut and thrust of politics. The robust debate that we must have. But that’s got to be based on facts and truth. Not on lies.”
“Those who are so desperate for attention that they’re prepared to debase themselves and their country. So this government will get on with the job of protecting victims, including victims of sexual abuse. What I won’t tolerate is a debate based on lies and politicians jumping on the bandwagon simply to get attention. When those politicians were in government for 14 long years.”
When the British rioted in response to their own government protecting Muslim child rapists and arresting British citizens for calling the Islamists out for who they are, psychotic terrorist insurrectionists seeking to destroy Britian, Starmer called the British people “racist thugs.”
He chortled that he would “never accept the argument…that millions of people concerned about immigration are one and the same thing as people who smashed up businesses, targeted mosques, attempted to burn refugees, scrawled racist graffiti over walls, Nazi salutes at the Cenotaph, attacked NHS nurses and told people with different coloured skin, people who contribute here, people who grew up here, that they should ‘go home.’”
Never mind that the Nazi salute accusation was an intentional lie intended to stir up more violence against the British people by fellow leftist Brits and the Islamist psychopaths the left uses in its fight against human liberty.
He concluded in his racist, terrorist speech, “I will never let a minority of violent, racist thugs terrorise our communities.” He said that sentence despite the fact that he continues to allow that very thing, only it’s not the British citizen that is guilty of this charge, it’s his Islamist allies, the brown shirt thugs of the left, who are guilty, along with him (because he aids and abets them).
- BLASPHEMY LAWS NEXT? – Even as the rape gangs continue to rape children in the UK, Keir Starmer is spending his efforts trying to “protect” the Islamist psychopaths from public scrutiny, coming out recently in favor of the possibility of blasphemy laws that would be defined by Islamists.
In November, during a PM question time, Starmer said, “November marks Islamophobia Awareness Month – last year, the UN Human Rights Council adopted a resolution condemning the desecration of religious texts, including the Koran. Despite opposition from the previous Government, acts of such mindless desecration only serve to fuel division and hatred within our society.”
The follow-up question to him was, “Will the Prime Minister commit to introducing measures to prohibit the desecration of all religious texts and the prophets of the Abrahamic religions?”
He answered by refusing to rule out blasphemy laws, then added, “Desecration is awful, and I think it should be condemned across the House. We are committed to tackling all forms of hatred and division, including Islamophobia in all its forms.”
- ARRESTING THE PROTESTORS, NOT THE GROOMERS – Starmer’s record on arresting political prisoners is a further stunning admission of his guilt. The side that insists it must be protected by state guns from dissent is ALWAYS the evil one. Some of the people who have been arrested were children, including an 11-year-old.
BBC, a British-hating, and U.S. taxpayer funded, Labour-Party-run, far left agit prop information terror machine, covered the chilling arrests in as positive a light as possible:
In the first case of a person going to jail for posting on social media during the disorder, Jordan Parlour, 28, of Seacroft, Leeds, received a 20-month sentence for inciting others to target a Leeds building which housed asylum seekers.
At least two others also received jail sentences for social media posts that stirred up racial hatred.
Suspended Labour councillor Ricky Jones appeared in court charged with encouraging violent disorder after he was filmed apparently telling a crowd that far-right demonstrators should have their throats cut.
6000 officers with specialist training in public order are “prepared and ready” to deal with any potential unrest over the weekend.
About 600 people have been arrested this week, with hundreds more expected in the coming days and weeks, police say, with the use of facial recognition technology fast tracking the process…
This was in response to the riots in August that happened after the government tried to protect the Islamist murderers of British children.
It should be noted that the so-called “Conservative” party arrested over 3,000 people JUST for posting online (under Theresa May), so the anti-British, pro-Islamist actions of Starmer and Labour are not exclusive to them. This might explain why Reform currently leads Labour as the Conservative Party continues to fade into oblivion (since they’ve devolved into being an extension of Labour).
PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS
The current breakdown of Britain’s parliament shows that Labour currently holds 404 out of 649 seats, meaning the chances of a no-confidence vote against Starmer to trigger an early snap election are slim to none. Labour won 34 percent of the vote to the Conservatives’ 24 percent and Reform’s 14 percent, meaning they won an almost insurmountable majority with only 1/3 of voting British citizens choosing them.
There is no minimum time for a PM to serve before the next general election. A general election is called by the Prime Minister or a No-Confidence vote. His recent actions suggest that he might not offer another election again, if his party has his way.
Seeing how badly they were doing in the polls, apparently it is legal for Labour to cancel local elections until 2026, possibly 2027, which they did ostensibly to protect local voters (or so they claimed).
The British people, what’s left of them, are facing at least four more years of complete tyranny as the Labour Party continues its efforts, with the help of the Conservative Party, to fully dismantle a liberty-bounded government and replace it with a Marxist one. Elections are not a recourse. Protests will now get you thrown in jail.
This “experiment” will end either with Britian being converted to a leftist third world hellhole or an event will occur, maybe a major terror assault the government tries to conceal, that will trigger a wholesale collapse of the government through nationwide non-compliance followed by a mass assault of 10 Downing Street in the style of the 1381 Peasant’s Revolt (only the boy king Starmer won’t be able to invoke God to save him like Richard II did).
The course for Britain is death or violent overthrow because all the non-violent bullets have been removed, in part by the Conservative Party, in full by the Labour Party.
In short, outside of a dramatic act of resistance by the liberty-minded British (what’s left of them), the UK will be successfully groomed into Marxism.
As a parting shot, let me point out that this report would land me in jail if I were subject to Starmer’s tyrannical rule.
FURTHER RESOURCES:
The Spirit of Pedophilia: Part Two – From Marx to Current Year – Paul Gordon Collier
Towards a Gay Communism – Elements of a Homosexual Critique – Mario Mieli
Originally published February 28, 2025 for our End-of-Month Issue of Mindful Intelligence Advisor. Subscribe to get semi-monthly issues.
By Joshua Bontrager, Political & Cultural Correspondent
“Trump, I believe, understands he is in a fight to the death. The American establishment tried to discredit and ruin him, to imprison him, to assassinate him. They stole his 2020 reelection from him. They tried to steal his New York properties. It is not possible for Trump to have illusions about what he is up against. He is up against evil.” –Paul Craig Roberts
“And I charged your judges at that time, saying, Hear the causes between your brethren, and judge righteously between every man and his brother, and the stranger that is with him.” –Deuteronomy 1:16
“You seem…to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions; a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy… The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots.” –Thomas Jefferson, Letter to William Jarvis, Sept. 28, 1820
INTRODUCTION
Donald Trump is “a president who counts every week like it’s his last,” says Vice President JD Vance. In his first six weeks, Trump has unleashed a historic, multi-faceted, and withering counter-revolution against the authoritarian Marxist regime that nearly destroyed America and himself.
Since 2016, the opposition has weakened significantly. The mainstream media is less trusted now than Trump, and has been exposed as mere state-funded propaganda. Fearful Senate Republicans have confirmed every one of Trump’s nominees thus far, while billionaire elites who once resisted Trump are eager to curry his favor and the Democratic Party remains toxic and rudderless.
Against this surging America First tide, rogue judges have issued a flurry of rulings to sabotage Trump’s popular mandate. In their minds, “defending democracy” means “protecting the Deep State” while defying the Constitution and American voters.
President Trump is no stranger to judicial tyranny, as his administration lost about two-thirds of lawsuits filed against it in his first term. Trump survived the Russiagate hoax and two impeachments. Multiple courts rejected challenges to the rigged 2020 election, including the U.S. Supreme Court, which refused to hear an election lawsuit in December 2020 from 18 state attorneys general and 106 Republican members of Congress.
Ultimately, judges were unable to bankrupt and imprison Trump, remove him from the ballot, and block his return to power. Now, they are desperate to stop Trump and his allies before his renewed war on the Deep State becomes impossible to reverse.
This report will (1) break down the 80+ lawsuits against the Trump administration, (2) review the history and growth of judicial tyranny in America, beginning with the poisonous ideologies of Hegel, Marx, and Darwin, and (3) assess how current legal battles will likely play out in the days ahead.
- 80+ LAWSUITS FILED AGAINST TRUMP
“Appointed federal judges, on their own subjective judgment and using all their power, have written pieces of paper that overruled the wishes of 74.2 million Americans who have expressed their will concerning the shape of the regime that rules them. Instead, they say, permanent bureaucrats should rule all without any say from the voters who pay all the bills. That is called tyranny.” –Jeffrey A. Tucker
Eighty-eight lawsuits have been filed against the Trump administration (according to Fox News), with most of them emanating from Civil Service Strong, a coalition launched by lawfare assassins Marc Elias and Norm Eisen on December 19, 2024. The coalition includes all Democratic state attorneys general and eight key leftist groups.
Multiple lawsuits have been funded indirectly by Mark Zuckerberg (who now claims to be pro-Trump). Since 2015, the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative has funneled $2 billion to the Silicon Valley Community Foundation, which supports the anti-Trump legal outfit Protect Democracy.
- TRUMP LOSSES – Over 30 rulings have paused various aspects of Trump’s agenda:
- Birthright citizenship: Just three days after Trump’s election, Washington, D.C., San Francisco, and Democratic attorneys general from 22 states signed a secret legal pact to resist Trump’s efforts to end birthright citizenship. Four separate judges ruled against Trump’s executive order terminating birthright citizenship for illegals, and the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals refused to pause the orders.
- Treasury payments: Judge Deborah Boardman blocked Elon Musk and DOGE from accessing sensitive information at the Department of Education and the Office of Personnel Management. Judges barred DOGE from accessing payment systems at the Treasury Department and ruled two weeks later to continue the ban. However, the ruling came after DOGE technicians had already mapped the data.
- USAID: A leftist legal group accused the Trump administration of failing to comply with an order from Judge Amir H. Ali to continue funding to USAID and its partners.
- Mutilating children: Two judges ruled to stop Trump’s executive order defunding groups that perform transgender mutilation surgeries on children.
- Spending: Judge John J. McConnell, who has called Trump a “tyrant” and whose organization received at least $117.6 million in government funding, halted Trump’s temporary spending freeze. Judge Loren AliKhan blocked Trump from freezing federal grants and loans.
- Deportations: Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales blocked the Trump administration from sending three Venezuelan illegals to Guantanamo Bay.
- Bureaucracy: Judge Rudolph Contreras ordered the Trump administration to reinstate Cathy Harris as head of the Merit Protection Board. Judge Amy Berman Jackson ordered Trump to reinstate Biden-appointed head of the Office of Special Counsel Hampton Dellinger. The U.S. Supreme Court declined to block the temporary ruling.
- DEI: A Maryland federal district court ruled against Trump’s executive orders on DEI.
While the media has framed many of the above rulings as absolute defeats for Trump, some have been temporary restraining orders, not longer-term preliminary injunctions, meaning they only temporarily delay Trump’s agenda.
- TRUMP WINS – Judges have also ruled in favor of President Trump:
- USAID: Judge Carl Nichols temporarily halted the Trump administration’s move to place thousands of USAID employees on administrative leave but later ruled that Trump’s overhaul of USAID could proceed.
- DOGE: Obama-appointed U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who presided over the sham “election interference” case against Trump, declined to stop DOGE from accessing agency data or firing federal employees.
- Bureaucracy: Judge Christopher Cooper Law declined to blockthe Trump administration’s mass layoffs.
- Buyout: Judge George A. O’Toole Jr. allowed Trump’s buyout offer to federal workers to proceed.
- OBSTRUCTIONIST JUDGES – Many of the rogue judges were appointed by Democrats such as Obama and Biden, but some were appointed by Bush, Reagan, and even Trump. Most are loyal to the Deep State, not the American Republic. The judges include Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, who sentenced seven peaceful pro-lifers to prison, including a 75-year-old grandma, and Judge Angel Kelly, who is friendly to Communist China and has said that systemic racism plagues America’s judicial system.
- THE ROOTS OF AMERICAN JUDICIAL TYRANNY
“The rule of law, not the rule of men, is the foundation of a free society.” –John A. Stormer, Betrayed by the Bench, 2005
In 1962, the Republican majority-appointed Supreme Court ruled to remove prayer and the Bible from government schools. In 1973, the Court condemned over 60 million innocent unborn babies to death in Roe v. Wade.
In 2015, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 to recognize same-sex “marriage” in Obergefell v. Hodges. Following Obergefell, then-Ohio Gov. John Kasich (R) proclaimed, “The court has ruled, and it’s time to move on.” Many Republicans who were relieved that courts allowed them to wash their hands of controversial moral issues were unhappy when Roe was overturned.
Over 100 years, Supreme Court opinions centralized state power, corrupted morality, and perverted the Founding vision. Yet, the roots of judicial tyranny started with the Marxist/humanist ideology that infected America’s legal system 150 years ago.
- THE FOUNDING ERA – The Declaration of Independence criticized King George for “[making] Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.”
Judicial tyranny was discussed in The Federalist Papers, with James Madison writing in Number 47, “The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands…may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.”
The Founders envisioned Congress as the most powerful branch and the judiciary as the least powerful. However, Anti-Federalist and New York judge Robert Yates warned that the Constitution’s proposed Supreme Court would hold “immense powers” and be “very liberal” in interpreting the Constitution. (Yates ultimately withdrew from the Constitutional Convention because he said it was exceeding its instructions.)
In Marbury v. Madison (1803), the U.S. Supreme Court gave itself the power of judicial review, allowing the Court to de facto legislate by striking down laws it deemed unconstitutional, a power that was fully exercised in the 20th century.
Thomas Jefferson warned that allowing the judiciary to determine the constitutionality of laws would make it “a despotic branch” (1804 letter), and said the judiciary’s establishment of “law by precedent” was “sapping, by little and little, the foundations of the constitution” (1823 letter).
In his inaugural address, President Abraham Lincoln said if the Supreme Court is the final authority, “the people will have ceased to be their own rulers.”
- THE RISE OF LEGAL PROGRESSIVISM – In his Commentaries on the Laws of England, English jurist William Blackstone recognized God’s natural law as “binding over all the globe” and said that “no human laws are of any validity, if [they are] contrary to this.”
Post-Civil War, America shifted from Blackstone and the Christian common law recognized in the Declaration of Independence toward “case law,” inspired by George F.W. Hegel, Charles Darwin, and Karl Marx. In 1970, Christopher Columbus Langell was appointed Dean of Harvard Law School. Langell’s “case law” posited that legal right and wrong are determined not by absolutes, but by societal evolution.
Later Harvard legal minds promoted this new philosophy, including Dean Roscoe Pound. One of Pound’s followers, Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes, claimed, “We are under a constitution, but the constitution is what we say it is.” Presidents Woodrow Wilson (the father of the modern administrative state) and Franklin Delano Roosevelt heartily embraced this view. Decades later, Supreme Court Justice William J. Brennan asserted, “The genius of the Constitution rests not in any static meaning it may have had in a world dead and gone but in its evolving character.”
In 1920, the American Civil Liberties Association (ACLU) was founded by Fabian Socialists John Dewey and Roger Baldwin and Communists William Z. Foster and Elizabeth Gurley Flynn. In 1925, the ACLU initiated the “Scopes Monkey Trial” to promote evolution and denigrate Biblical Creationism.
Tragically, the corruption of American law coincided with the rise of mass propaganda, compulsory education, economic centralization, and cultural/family destruction.
- POWER OF THE SUPREME COURT – In the 1920s, 30s, and 40s, the Supreme Court increased its power and deployed the Commerce Clause and the Incorporation Doctrine to expand federal authority at the expense of states and individual liberties.
The Incorporation Doctrine used the 14th Amendment to turn the Bill of Rights – originally designed to limit federal government power – on its head and weaken the liberty of states and individuals.
The Mises Institute’s Ryan McMaken states, “We can have a functioning Tenth Amendment, or we can have an Incorporation Doctrine. But not both… The idea of the American confederation was to provide protections for liberty through competition among states, and through balancing state power against federal power.”
- HOW CURRENT LEGAL FIGHTS COULD PLAY OUT
“If a judge tried to tell a general how to conduct a military operation, that would be illegal. If a judge tried to command the attorney general in how to use her discretion as a prosecutor, that’s also illegal. Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power.” –Vice President JD Vance
Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the University of California Berkeley Law School, said, “It’s very frightening to think that they will disobey court orders. If they don’t, it will be a constitutional crisis unlike anything this country has seen, because if the president can violate constitutional laws and disobey court orders, then the name for that is a dictatorship.”
In reality, rogue judges fueled the current Constitutional crisis by shredding the Constitution for 100 years. Chemerinsky and his fellow regime apparatchiks despise constitutional law and American voters.
Deep Staters are panicked because their taxpayer-funded empire of grift, propaganda, and tyranny is crumbling, and they view the courts as their last line of defense.
- HOW WILL THE SUPREME COURT RULE? – With several exceptions, President Trump seems poised to let the current legal drama play out until it reaches the Supreme Court, which he hopes will rebuke lower court overreach. Justices Sotomayer, Jackson, and Kagan will vote against Trump, while Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch will likely favor Trump, leaving Roberts, Kavanaugh, and Barrett as the swing judges.
The Federalist’s Sean Davis contended, “John Roberts and SCOTUS have two options here: they can bring these inferior malcontents to heel, or they can get used to the President simply ignoring these inferior courts or Congress eliminating them entirely.”
On February 25, Chief Justice John Roberts delayed U.S. District Judge Amir Ali’s unconstitutional order demanding that Trump unfreeze $2 billion in questionable USAID contracts by midnight.
- WILL TRUMP DISMANTLE JUDICIAL SUPREMACISM? – For eight years, Trump has been assaulted by a weaponized legal system, leaving Trump and his allies battle-scarred, resolved, and organized in a way they were not in 2016. Consider these signals from key Trump allies:
- Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt: “We believe these judges are acting as judicial activists rather than honest arbiters of the law. The real constitutional crisis is taking place within our judicial branch.”
- Trump Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller: “The Founders created a unitary executive branch in which ‘the executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States.’ All executive power is vested in the one man elected by the whole nation. No unelected bureaucrat has any ‘independent’ ”
- Vice President JD Vance in 2021: “Trump should…fire every single mid-level bureaucrat, every civil servant in the administrative state, replace them with our people, and…when the courts stop you, stand before the country like Andrew Jackson did and say the Chief Justice has made his ruling, now let him enforce it.”
The President who narrowly escaped at least two assassins is unlikely to let rogue judges thwart his efforts to decentralize government power and restore American greatness.
- WILL JUDICIAL ACTIVISM SPUR REFORM? – Below are several potential reforms that could be undertaken by Congress:
- Attorney John A. Lucas urged Congress to “restrict the use of nationwide injunctions and make it more difficult to rig results by judge shopping in such cases.”
- Mike Lee (R-UT) is preparing legislation to limit the ability of lower courts to block executive orders.
- Eli Crane (R-AZ) and Elon Musk have called for impeaching rogue judges. El Salvador President Nayib Bukele said his country “had to remove corrupt judges and corrupt attorneys and prosecutors.”
- Data Republican suggested exposing corrupt judges by using AI to analyze and identify connections between judges and NGOs.
PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS
“If we don’t rid ourselves of the false construct of judicial supremacism, the same judges from January 6 in the D.C. federal district and circuit will be governing the country.” –Daniel Horowitz
Judicial activism will continue as Democrats, unable and unwilling to provide an alternative vision for America, fearmonger about “dictatorship” and “constitutional crisis.” These same Democrats will ignore the real constitutional crisis that began when humanists injected evolutionary “case law” into the legal system 150 years ago.
Either lawfare will defeat Trump’s second term as the plandemic did his first, or (more likely) rogue justices will give Trump an opportunity to weaken judicial supremacy or even end it once and for all.
If the Supreme Court upholds Trump’s agenda, the Left will continue tarring the Court – which shifted from 68% trust in 2019 to 44% trust in 2024 – as illegitimate. Such calls could motivate assassination attempts on conservative Supreme Court justices, similar to the 2022 media-inspired plot to assassinate Justice Kavanaugh. On the other hand, if the Supreme Court greenlights Trump’s agenda, Marxists could inflame riots and conflict “in the streets.”
However, Democrats will have difficulty reclaiming a popular narrative, as their Party doubles down on wokeness and once “respectable” DNC propaganda outlets lose taxpayer funding and viewers. Stopping Trump’s populist reforms will be difficult… but only if the President continues delivering on his promises and can avoid war, full-blown economic collapse, or a coup from the shifty billionaire tech elite.
While Trump and Congress can rein in out-of-line judges, American patriots must strive to strip unconstitutional powers from all three government branches and the bureaucracy and return authority to states and individuals. (The New American notes that nearly 80% of federal government “is unconstitutional”.)
In the final analysis, a greater challenge than reversing judicial tyranny and centralized power will be undoing the Marxist/humanist cultural revolution that destroyed America’s Biblically-based law, education, churches, economy, culture, and families over 150 years. Restoration will require rejecting the devil’s promise to “be as gods” (Genesis 3) and submitting to God’s divine wisdom and authority.
Former Communist Whitaker Chambers articulated the choice: “God or Man, Soul or Mind, Freedom or Communism.”
America still confronts this epochal crossroads, one that will determine the fate, not only of our legal system, but also of our future, families, and freedom.
FURTHER RESEARCH:
Judicial Tyranny – Samuel Francis
The American Covenant: The Untold Story – Dr. Marshall Foster
