March 11, 2026

Judgefare

Blurb:

A left-wing activist network is training liberals how to slip onto juries in federal cases and then vote “not guilty” to derail prosecutions brought by the Trump Justice Department.

Recordings and training materials tied to the group Freedom Trainers show activists being coached on how to conceal their left-wing views during jury selection and then use jury nullification once they are seated on a jury. The webinars, slide decks, and pamphlets behind the effort all push the same approach: Blend in during selection, say the right things to get seated, and use the jury room to block convictions.

The premise is straightforward. Look like any other potential juror, avoid signaling their radical political agenda, and make it through voir dire, the jury selection process, without raising suspicion. Once deliberations begin, however, the guidance shifts sharply.

An Obama-appointed Judge, Sara Ellis, got a verbal beatdown from the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, accusing her of “effectively establish[ing]” herself “as the supervisor of all Executive Branch activity in the city of Chicago.” The court shut down her effective effort to control the Federal Immigration policies for the city of Chicago and its surrounding communities.

Parts of her initial order included a requirement the DHS give her a daily brief of all their activities in the city, to assure compliance, They also include preventing federal agents from “using hands-on physical force such as pulling or shoving to the ground, tackling, or body slamming’ anyone who is not causing an immediate threat of physical harm to other…” It also granted anyone calling themselves a journalist be allowed to stay in an area, even of a dispersal order is lawfully given.

Blurb:

Obama Judge Gets Schooled by Appeals Court Following ‘Constitutionally Suspect’ Injunction Against DHS – westernjournal.com

A federal appeals court went out of its way last week to shoot down a federal judge’s ruling in a case regarding Department of Homeland Security operations in the old stomping grounds of former President Barack Obama.

And the Obama-appointed judge who found herself in the appeals court crosshairs probably won’t be forgetting it anytime soon.

It was a lecture that constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley called a “haymaker” to the activist jurist.

The judge in question is Judge Sara Ellis, nominated to the bench in 2013 by that old Chicago pol Obama.

In October, according to the appeals court decision Thursday, she issued a wide-ranging injunction against the DHS’s use of crowd-control techniques as part of Operation Midway Blitz, the Trump administration’s crackdown on illegal immigration and crime in Chicago.

The ruling amounted to a “a sweeping preliminary injunction regulating all federal immigration enforcement efforts districtwide,” the appeals ruling stated.

As part of it, Ellis ordered the then-head of DHS operations in Chicago, Gary Bovino, to appear before her daily to explain the agency’s compliance.

In November, she issued a novelistic 233-page ruling (that started with a paean to Chicago writer Carl Sandberg) supporting her injunction and excoriating, at length, the DHS and its personnel.

As the court-oriented website Legalnewsline summarized in a piece on Friday:

“In her ruling, Ellis famously sided almost entirely with the anti-government position, blocking ICE and Border Patrol agents associated with the now-ended ‘Operation Midway Blitz’ and other immigration enforcement operations from using physical force or riot control weapons or even from ‘issuing a crowd dispersal order’ requiring so-called protestors ‘to leave a public place that they lawfully have a right to be.’

Related:

This Chicago School Is 92% Empty and Spends $93k Per Student – You’ll Be Sick to Learn How Many of Them Read Proficiently

“The order prohibited federal agents from ‘using hands-on physical force such as pulling or shoving to the ground, tackling, or body slamming’ anyone ‘who is not causing an immediate threat of physical harm to others …’

“The order also granted those claiming to be journalists the right to remain in an area undisturbed, even after an otherwise lawful dispersal order was given.”

The Trump administration appealed, and the appeals court stayed Ellis’ ruling while arranging to hear the case in full.

But things took a turn in December when the plaintiffs in the case — protesters and journalists who accused the DHS of violating First Amendment and Fourth Amendment rights — asked Ellis to dismiss their case — allegedly because clashes from Midway Blitz had died down in the Chicago area and the point was “moot,” legally.

As Legalnewsline noted, however, the motive was far more likely that the plaintiffs knew the appeals court would not be as malleable as Ellis, and didn’t want to lose a precedent-setting case.

The Justice Department also wanted the appeal dismissed, but under a deliberate legal strategy that would have kept its points intact.

In the end, Ellis tried to dismiss the case but did so “without prejudice,” meaning it could be activated again. That was apparently contradictory to the wishes of all parties involved.

And that was too much for the appeals court to let go.

The three-judge panel on the case is made up of the district’s Chief Judge Michael Brian Brennan, Judge Michael Yale Scudder, who made up the majority in the 2-1 ruling, and Judge Frank Easterbrook, a Reagan appointee, who dissented.

(Easterbrook’s dissent maintained that if both parties were willing to dismiss the case, it should have been dismissed.)

“The practical upshot of the district court’s decision is that the named plaintiffs and members of the class can refile in federal court tomorrow and try to reimplement the injunction anew,” the appeals court ruling stated.

And the court wasn’t going to let that happen — which meant ruling on a case that would have otherwise almost certainly been dismissed.

In other words, Ellis’ handling of the case was so “constitutionally suspect,” crossed so many lines, and set up so many potential future dangers, that the appeals court felt it necessary to go out of its way to head off problems down the road.

And it ruled resoundingly against the Obama-appointed judge who was in charge.

 

Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.


from www.westernjournal.com

Blurb:

When Democrats’ lawfare failed to keep Donald Trump out of the White House, the party of “democracy” turned to the last available lever of power they possessed to stop Orange Man Bad: the lower judiciary.

Through the art of judge-shopping, left-wing activists and groups have spent the past year strategically filing lawsuits in districts dominated by Democrat and liberal Republican appointees to challenge virtually every aspect of Trump’s agenda. And with little convincing rationale, many of these rogue judges have eagerly issued overreaching orders blocking the president from enacting it.

The latest example of this phenomenon came on Friday, when a three-judge panel comprised mostly of Democrat appointees rejected (2-1) a request by the Trump administration to pause a ruling by D.C. District Judge Ana Reyes. In her order, the Biden-appointed Reyes blocked the government from revoking Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for more than 350,000 Haitian nationals residing in the United States under the program.

The moderate Democrat Party of Virginia has just passed legislation that makes it illegal for public schools to suggest in any way, shape, or form, that the January 6, 2021, protests were anything but an insurrection. The legislation does not define the penalties for violating the unconstitutional law, but it does give Americans a sense of how extreme even the self-professing moderate democrats are.

Blurb:

Virginia Democrats Pass Bill Requiring Schools to Teach Jan 6 Was ‘Violent Insurrection’ – slaynews.com

Virginia lawmakers have approved Democrat legislation that requires all public schools to describe the January 6, 2021, Capitol protests as a “violent attack” and “insurrection,” while prohibiting teachers from characterizing the event as a peaceful demonstration.

The measure, HB 333, was introduced by Del. Dan I. Helmer (D-Fairfax) and passed after Democrats expanded their majority in the Virginia House of Delegates following the election of Gov. Abigail Spanberger last November.

Bill Restricts How Jan. 6 Can Be Taught

The legislation bars public school instruction from describing the January 6 events as a peaceful protest.

It also prohibits classroom materials from presenting claims that widespread election fraud could have altered the outcome of the 2020 presidential election as credible.

Specifically, the bill forbids teaching that portrays the protests as peaceful or that suggests there was “extensive election fraud” capable of changing the election results.

The legislation does not include explicit criminal penalties for teachers or schools that violate the rules.

Helmer Says Bill Addresses ‘False History’

Helmer defended the legislation in comments to The Virginia Mercury, arguing it responds to concerns about how the events of January 6 are being discussed.

“There is real concern that President Donald Trump is trying to rewrite the history of Jan. 6,” Helmer said.

He pointed to what he described as a WhiteHouse.gov website presenting a “false history.”

Helmer is an Iraq War veteran and longtime advocate for gun control, first elected in 2020 after flipping what had been the final Republican-held district in Fairfax County along the Prince William County border.

Critics Say Measure Politicizes Education

The bill has drawn opposition from religious and education groups who argue the legislation injects political ideology into classroom instruction.

Michael Huffman, executive director of the Virginia Assembly of Independent Baptists, criticized the proposal during testimony before a state Senate committee.

“The true education equips children for life, not political agendas,” Huffman said.

“Glorifying or mandating … the dark day serves only short-sighted partisanship, not our kids’ future.”

Democrats Push Broader Political Changes

The legislation comes as Virginia Democrats advance a series of controversial measures following their expanded control of the state legislature.

Among them is a proposed redistricting overhaul that critics say could reshape the state’s congressional map and potentially reduce the number of Republican-held districts.

Under the proposed map, Democrats could control 10 of Virginia’s 11 congressional seats, leaving only Rep. Morgan Griffith (R-VA) representing a reliably Republican district.

Helmer Launches Congressional Bid

Helmer has also announced a campaign for Congress in one of the newly drawn districts.

Critics have nicknamed the proposed district the “lobster” or the “scorpion” because of its unusual shape.

The district stretches from Arlington near the Potomac River, then splits into two arms extending southwest toward Rawley Springs near the West Virginia border and south toward Goochland and Powhatan.

Supporters argue the map reflects population distribution, while opponents say it combines Republican-leaning communities with heavily Democratic areas to reshape the electoral balance.

Helmer recused himself from the redistricting process, according to The New York Times, though he is considered an ally of Virginia House Speaker Don Scott (D-Portsmouth).

Scott led the effort in the lower chamber.

Redistricting Vote Still Ahead

The new congressional map will ultimately require approval from voters in an April special election before it can take effect.

Helmer already faces at least one Democrat challenger in what is expected to be a strongly Democratic Party-leaning district if the map is approved.

Meanwhile, the education bill adds another flashpoint in Virginia’s ongoing political battles over school curriculum, election integrity, and how recent political events are taught in classrooms.

READ MORE – House Democrats Continue Pushing DHS Shutdown as Iranian Terror Threats Escalate

from slaynews.com

Blurb:

A break-in at the Democratic National Committee headquarters in the 1970s set off a chain of events that ended a presidency. Operatives tied to President Richard Nixon installed wiretaps inside the Watergate complex. When it was exposed, the fallout reshaped American politics.

Now a bombshell report from Reuters reveals Biden’s FBI carried out a Wategate-style operation against Donald Trump and his 2024 presidential campaign.

According to Reuters, the FBI under then-President Joe Biden secretly obtained Susie Wiles’ phone records while she was a private citizen working on behalf of Trump’s 2024 campaign. Two anonymous FBI officials also said that Biden’s FBI “recorded a phone call between Wiles and her attorney” in 2023.

Blurb:

 

In the spring of 2024, a group of anti-Israel students took over Hamilton Hall at Columbia University. There were two custodians in the building at the time who ultimately sued the school, claiming they were basically held hostage.

Now a New York judge has overturned the disciplinary actions against these students. Once again, the radical left is untouchable.

FOX News reports:

Columbia University ‘occupiers’ who held staff hostage have discipline overturned by NY judge

A New York state Supreme Court judge has vacated disciplinary sanctions against 22 former and current Columbia University students who took over Hamilton Hall in April 2024 during anti-Israel protests.

Justice Gerald Lebovits ruled on Feb. 27, 2026, that the university had improperly relied on sealed arrest records in its internal disciplinary proceedings against the students and the sealed arrests were the only evidence students were in the building during the occupation.

“Ultimately, this court concludes that the underlying disciplinary determinations were not impermissibly delayed. But respondent’s internal hearing panel was statutorily barred from taking into account the fact that petitioners had been arrested in Hamilton Hall,” Lebovits wrote. “And the fact of petitioners’ sealed arrests was the only evidence before the hearing panel that petitioners were in Hamilton Hall while it was occupied. As a result, the panel’s determinations that petitioners committed most of the charged disciplinary violations… are arbitrary and capricious.”

Blurb:

 

The founder of Star Autism Center admitted that he began the $6 million scam after “investors” approached him and provided families from the Somali community to bilk the federal government out of taxpayer cash.

Abdinajib Hassan Yussuf was only 22 years old when he started running the scheme after dropping out of St. Cloud Technical College in Aug. 2020.

The more services the families signed up for, the more they would receive in kickback payments.

Blurb:

The people who cheered on Jack Smith’s corrupt investigations into Donald Trump and his allies are suddenly silent after a bombshell report detailing the Biden FBI’s politically-charged spying ops.

Reuters this week reported the Democrat-led FBI subpoenaed records of phone calls made by current FBI Director Kash Patel and Susie Wiles, Trump’s campaign manager who now serves as his White House chief of Staff, in 2022 and 2023 when they were private citizens. Two anonymous FBI officials told the publication that the agency “recorded a phone call between Wiles and her attorney” in 2023.

Blurb:

 

The hideous thug Rep. Ilhan Omar heckled at President Trump during his SOTU speech. President Trump is 100 percent correct. Rep Ilhan Omar is garbage. As is the Keffiyeh clad Rep. Rashida Tlaib, who whore a ‘Fuck Ice’ pin at the speech.

What  lowlifes. How are these seditious criminals still in this country?

Without the illegal vote, the jihad caucus would never have been elected.

She married her brother. Deport her.

Blurb:

A Somali daycare operator accused of siphoning millions in taxpayer dollars through fraudulent schemes in Minnesota has been arrested after she was caught attempting to flee the country.

Fahima Egeh Mahamud, the owner of Future Leaders Early Learning Center, was taken into custody after booking travel to the United Kingdom, according to court documents and local reports.

She is now the 79th defendant charged in connection with the sprawling Feeding Our Future fraud investigation.

An article in the New York Times called “The Plan for a Radically Different Supreme Court Is Here,” exposes the Progmerican ideological capture of Federal judges and its plans to only accelerate the acts of insurrectionist judges.

The organization cultivating and identifying potential and exist jurists willing to rule based on social justice (Progmerican Rule of Law) over Individual Justice (American Rule of Law) is called the American Constitution Society (which is, in real spirit, the Progmerican Social Justice Rule of Law Society). This is the society the Biden committee used to select the 235 judges now working as one in opposition to the American republic, in lock step with Progmerican rule of law.

Jeffrey Toobin of CNN echoed the plan the article exposed, saying “For now, under Mr. Brest, the A.C.S. seems headed for an approach that looks like the one that Democratic politicians have so far adopted: aimed more at opposition to Mr. Trump’s record rather than on a specific, alternative vision for the Constitution. In his opening message to the group, Mr. Brest described the A.C.S. as building ‘a bulwark against overreach by the Trump administration and the Roberts court. Mr. Brest has pledged that A.C.S. will continue its Biden-era focus on judicial appointments … As for what those judges will stand for — as opposed to what they stand against — Mr. Brest has no clear answer.”

Blurb:

NYT Accidentally Admits There’s A Judicial Coup Against Trump – thefederalist.com

CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin has never been one to show good judgement. When he’s not getting caught conducting “personal business” on a staff Zoom call, he’s accidentally admitting that there’s an ongoing leftist-led judicial coup designed to stymie President Trump’s agenda.

The serial self-pleasurer let the proverbial cat out of the bag in his Monday opinion column for The New York Times. Titled, “The Plan for a Radically Different Supreme Court Is Here,” the article purports to roll out a blueprint for countering conservative appointments of originalist judges to the bench but inadvertently discloses the existence of leftists’ efforts to weaponize the judicial system against Trump.

The admission comes in the piece’s opening paragraphs, in which Toobin discusses the American Constitution Society and its new president, Phil Brest. The ACS has often been described as the less successful and left-wing alternative to the conservative Federalist Society, which has become an influential force in getting originalists appointed to the Supreme Court and other federal judgeships.

After lower-level insurrectionist DNC-CCP judges repeatedly attempted to force the Trump administration to keep funding their party’s money laundering foreign aid fund scheme, the Supreme Court has officially ended their judicial tyranny. SCOTUS ruled 6-3 the Trump administration has every right to cut off $4 billion in foreign aid if he so chooses. The six justices assessed that “the harms to the Executive’s conduct of foreign affairs appear to outweigh the potential harm faced by respondents.”

Blurb:

Supreme Court Hands Trump HUGE Victory, Clears Path to Freeze $4 Billion in Foreign Aid – gellerreport.com

The U.S. Supreme Court will allow the federal government to freeze more than $4 billion in foreign aid payments that President Trump tried to cancel last month using a rare “pocket rescission.”

The justices voted 6-3 to grant the Trump administration’s emergency appeal, which stopped a lower court’s order to release the funds that had already been set aside.

A spokesperson for the White House Office of Management and Budget said, “This is a huge win for restoring the President’s power to carry out his policies. Left-wing groups can no longer take over the president’s agenda.

Blurb:

A federal judge has ordered the search warrant affidavit justifying the FBI‘s raid on a Fulton County, Georgia, election facility last month to be unsealed.

The FBI raided the election facility on Jan. 28 after securing a search warrant, seizing physical ballots, tabulator tapes, electronic ballot images, and voter rolls generated during the 2020 election at the building. Fulton County has since sued the Trump administration in order to get the files back, arguing their seizure was illegal.

Blurb:

A bombshell undercover recording has exposed what critics are calling a deliberate federal cover-up of massive Somali daycare fraud in Minnesota, with an FBI agent admitting that no one will ever be arrested despite billions in taxpayer dollars being looted.

On Tuesday, the O’Keefe Media Group (OMG) released undercover footage showing FBI agent Justin Devine telling a covert reporter that investigations into Somali-run daycare fraud schemes in Minnesota will quietly die without charges.

“I don’t think anybody [daycare fraud criminals] would ever go to prison,” Devine said, referring directly to investigative reporting by independent journalist Nick Shirley, whose work has exposed widespread fraud across Minneapolis.

An Obama-appointed Judge has thrown out the Department of Justice’s misconduct complaint against U.S. District Justice James Boasberg, the symbol of Progmerican judicial insurrection in the American republic. The justice was accused of trying to inappropriately influence Chief Justice John Roberts, telling him before Trump retook off in 2025 that he would “disregard rulings of federal courts” to “trigger a constitutional crisis.”

Chief Judge of the U.S. Sixth Circuit Jeffrey S. Sutton declared in his ruling, “A recycling of unadorned allegations with no reference to a source does not corroborate them. And a repetition of uncorroborated statements rarely supplies a basis for a valid misconduct complaint.”

Blurb:

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Tosses DOJ Misconduct Complaint Against Judge Boasberg – townhall.com

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals has tossed a misconduct complaint against U.S. District Judge James Boasberg, an Obama appointee, after he “attempted to improperly influence Chief Justice Roberts” at a March Judicial Conference in 2025, by claiming that the Trump administration was seeking to “disregard rulings of federal courts,” and trigger “a constitutional crisis.”

The complaint also cites Boasberg’s 2025 ruling that blocked the Trump administration’s efforts to deport Venezuelan nationals to El Salvador’s CECOT prison under the Alien Enemies Act and sought to remove him from J.G.G. v. Trump, an ACLU-backed lawsuit challenging the mass deportations.

Chief Judge of the Sixth Circuit, Jeffrey S. Sutton, originally dismissed the complaint on December 19, though this was only made public this week. He alleged that not only had the federal government failed to provide sufficient evidence of Boasberg’s comments, but that they were completely within bounds for the Judicial Conference of the United States.

Blurb:

A rogue federal judge has issued an order blocking the Trump administration from ending Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haitian migrants.

DHS Secretary Kristi Noem had ordered the termination of TPS for Haitians, and it was supposed to go into effect on Tuesday.

This would have forced hundreds of thousands of Haitian migrants living in the United States to either leave or get deported.

However, U.S. District Judge Ana C. Reyes, who was appointed by Biden, just put an indefinite pause on that order.

Blurb:

Most Americans would assume that federal judges — ostensibly some of the most important arbiters in the U.S. judiciary system — would have a pretty good grasp of the basic facts.

Things like who, what, when, where, and why are all rather important topics when presiding over any tenuous legal matter.

Alas, every once in a while, judges can apparently get those very important factoids wrong, too.

And it’s raising a lot of questions.

Blurb:

A federal judge on Saturday denied a motion for a preliminary injunction in a lawsuit filed by the State of Minnesota, the City of Minneapolis, and the City of St. Paul against the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and related officials seeking to halt Operation Metro Surge, the Trump Administration’s codename for a massive immigration enforcement operation in Minnesota.

U.S. District Judge Katherine M. Menendez, a Biden appointee, stated in her decision that the plaintiffs had not met their burden to justify the extraordinary remedy of halting the operation based on the Tenth Amendment. She emphasized that the court was not making a final determination on the merits or commenting on the wisdom of the operation, but focused solely on the request for immediate relief.

Blurb:

Northwestern University has convinced a federal judge in Chicago to toss a lawsuit filed against the school alleging it discriminates against white men in its faculty hiring process.

The case was dismissed by U.S. District Judge Sarah Ellis, an Obama-appointee, who agreed with Northwestern’s argument that the plaintiff organization, Faculty, Alumni, and Students Opposed to Racial Preferences, lacked standing because it failed to show its members had actually applied for open positions at the law school, Reuters reported.

Blurb:

 

A growing number of Democrat rogue judges are waging open war on the rule of law, substituting ideology for statute and personal politics for public safety. By blocking deportations, freeing violent offenders, and nullifying duly enacted laws, these judges are not “checking power,” they are seizing it, overriding the will of voters and lawmakers alike. The result is predictable: communities put at risk, law enforcement undermined, and a justice system that rewards contempt for the law while punishing those tasked with enforcing it. This is not judicial independence; it is judicial sabotage—an assault on law and order and on the American way of life itself, which depends on equal application of the law, not rule by robe.

Blurb:

 

Monica Cannon-Grant is a Boston-based Black Lives Matter activist who has pleaded guilty to scamming more than $100,000 in Covid funds and other resources in order to fund her lavish lifestyle.

Yesterday, she was sentenced to six months of home confinement followed by four years of probation. No jail time.

Apparently, some people are actually above the law.

Blurb:

A federal judge in Washington, D.C., has allowed a massive offshore wind farm off the coast of New York to continue construction, after being blocked by the Trump administration for weeks.

The ruling marks the fifth court win the offshore wind industry has seen over President Donald Trump and his effort to suppress development of the renewable energy alternative.

Blurb:

Election integrity is the Democrat party’s death sentence.

Where the hell is the GOP Congress? Pass the SAVE Act and impeach Colleen Kollar-Kotelly.

Blurb:

Tuesday’s CBS Mornings sought to give viewers a look at “how things turn[ed] chaotic” in Minneapolis with correspondent Lilia Luciano, but she muddied the waters by blaming conservative journalist Nick Shirley for the deadly chaos and refused to acknowledge Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and Immigration Customs and Enforcement (ICE) had removed dangerous criminals from the Twin Cities.

Featured co-host Vladimir Duthiers had a similarly biased lead-in, including downplaying the reality of criminals taken off the streets:

Many Americans have been shocked by the images and stories coming out of Minneapolis these last few weeks. The White House says the surge in Homeland Security agents to the area was about combating fraud along with deporting criminal undocumented immigrants. But here’s the thing, many arrested people have no criminal record. Some say they were stopped at random. So, how did things turn chaotic?