Democrats Argue That JD’s Beatdown of Walz Was Actually Bad for Trump-Vance – RedState– redstate.com
Source Link
Excerpt:
… Despite JD Vance’s obvious beatdown of bumbling Tim Walz in Tuesday’s vice presidential debate, leave it to CNN to find (make up) a very thin silver lining behind a very dark cloud.
And that was before the debate even started.
CNN’s simp Democrat contributors absurdly argued that if Vance mopped the floor with the ill-prepared, serially-lying Minnesota governor, it would actually be bad for Vance. No, really.
Irrational rationalization at its “best”? Of course. After all, the self-proclaimed Most Trusted Name in News™ never fails to amuse the rational and objective among us.
Veteran Democrat hack and CNN regular David Axelrod kicked off the festivities.
Look, I think that he was hired basically as Donald Trump’s designated hitter. Donald Trump is a casting director, and he was convinced he would be good on TV for him, and this debate is obviously the most important television appearance there is.
And, you know, he comes in, we all know having worked with (CNN Democrat contributor) Van Jones, how these Yale-educated lawyers, very slick –
About The Author
