August 1, 2026

02 U.S. Politics

Go to Article
Excerpt from abc7news.com

Attorneys for Hunter Biden on Tuesday withdrew their bid for a new trial in his federal gun case, conceding in court papers that a motion they filed last month misunderstood a technicality in the district court’s capacity to carry out a trial.

The video is from a previous report.

Hunter Biden’s legal team had argued in a filing last month that his “convictions should be vacated” because trial commenced before a circuit court formally issued a mandate denying one of his many pretrial appeals — an argument disputing not the merits of the case, but the mechanics of the trial.

Hunter Biden, the son of President Joe Biden, was found guilty in June on three felony counts related to his purchase of a firearm in 2018 while allegedly addicted to drugs.

Go to Article
Excerpt from redstate.com

 

It’s been said many times before, but you don’t hate the press enough. You think you do, but you don’t. No matter how much you think you’ve figured out their depravity, there is always a lower level they are willing to stoop to.

That was on display on Tuesday after news broke that former Republican Sen. Jim Inhofe passed at the age of 89. Serving Oklahoma for over 50 years, the former senator resigned in 2023. Given the situation, one would think this would be a time for the press to give Inhofe’s family some space and grace. Instead, they decided to act like disgusting animals.

Go to Article
Excerpt from dailycaller.com

New Hampshire’s Hanover Police Department (HPD) have opened an investigation into the death of Won Jang, a 20-year-old Dartmouth College student whom authorities pulled out from a local river Sunday, an HPD press release reads.

Jang’s “body was recovered approximately 65 feet offshore” of the Connecticut River, and after it was identified, the deceased student’s next of kin was notified, HPD’s Chief of Police Charles B. Dennis wrote in the press release. (RELATED: Missing Woman’s Body Recovered From Python In Gruesome Find)

Go to Article
Excerpt from www.theblaze.com

 

Leftists appear conflicted about Western history. On the one hand, they have endeavored to sever ties with it,
tearing down statues, renaming places and species, and digging up graves. Yet, they also appear keen to transmogrify Western history — to rewrite it and reimagine it in order to bolster their contemporary worldview, advance their agenda, or to accommodate the sensitivities of their peers.

This latter impulse to transmogrify history appears to dominate in the United Kingdom where there is a burgeoning genre of revisionist agitprop aimed at either distorting facts to
paint Caucasians uniquely as history’s villains or to erase Caucasians from the isles’ history.

The British Broadcasting Corporation has contributed to this genre for years and has shown no signs of stopping.

Go to Article
Excerpt from www.madinamerica.com

In 1957, John Chapman published an article to the American Journal of Medicine titled “Peregrinating Problem Patients—Munchausen’s Syndrome”. The article describes his hospital’s frustration in dealing with a patient who he calls a “professional hospital bum”. The patient readmitted numerous times to the same hospital, suffering from an idiopathic bleeding disorder; however, upon further inspection, the hospital came to believe that his bleeding disorder was partially self-inflicted and partially fabricated. The man continued to plead for help and berated the doctors when they could not do anything more for him.

When I read this paper, I was struck by the animosity with which the patient is presented. He is continually insulted and demeaned. One physician describes him as “obese, obtuse, obstinate, obstreperous, and obscene”. I was particularly taken aback by the passage which concludes the paper:

Crooks and Liars runs scathing, leftist-slanted review of the Trump-RNC platform by “Republican” pro-unborn-baby-murder advocates

Go to Article
Excerpt from crooksandliars.com

Matt Smith of WISN-TV in Milwaukee caught up with Gail Ruzicka, one of the RNC platform committee members. She was not at all pleased with what had happened with this year’s platform. Not only are the Republicans trying to pretend that they aren’t 100% anti-abortion, but they aren’t even allowing their own people to bring it up behind closed doors. She was not alone in her displeasure:

The platform, released after a closed meeting of Republican National Committee party officials Monday in Milwaukee’s Baird Center, promotes nationalism, is less socially conservative on the issue of abortion access, and promotes new voting restrictions at a time when the GOP is pushing a conflicting message to their party faithful.

The way the platform was crafted and approved angered some committee members focused on pursuing a more aggressive policy on abortion access, who told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel debate was discouraged more than had been the case in previous platform draftings.

Politico headline suggest GOP “hypocrisy” is somehow worse than being forced to go a nuclear option because the Department of Justice refuses to prosecute their head Merrick Garland for contempt of congress in the same way the DOJ prosecuted former Trump cabinet members Peter Navaro and Steve Bannon

Go to Article
Excerpt from www.politico.com

House Republicans are openly skeptical of holding Attorney General Merrick Garland in “inherent contempt.” But they just might vote to do it this week.

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) is expected to trigger a vote Wednesday on her resolution, which would hold Garland in “inherent contempt” over the Justice Department’s refusal to hand over audio of President Joe Biden’s interview with former special counsel Robert Hur.

In a bid to assuage concerns from her GOP colleagues, Luna changed her resolution from allowing the House sergeant-at-arms to take Garland into custody to instead fining him $10,000 per day until he hands over the audio, which Biden has asserted executive privilege over.

The first draft of the resolution was expected to garner enough GOP opposition to tank it. But Republicans privately acknowledge there’s a chance Luna’s revised resolution could pass this week — not necessarily because GOP lawmakers enthusiastically support it, but because they won’t vote against it.

The Nation joins growing list of pro-unborn-baby murder advocates in spreading false narrative that “drop” in infant mortality rates is significant and not the result of having more at-risk pregnancies, resulting in significantly more infant lives saved, especially from the consequences of intended 1st degree murder

Go to Article
Excerpt from www.thenation.com

Researchers with Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health found that infant deaths rose by nearly 13 percent in 2022. Comparatively, these deaths, defined in the study as occurring under 12 months old, increased less than 2 percent in the rest of the United States.

“We found that infant mortality increased pretty substantially in Texas, but not in the rest of the country,” Alison Gemmill, assistant professor in the Bloomberg School’s Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health and one of the study’s lead authors, tells The Nation. “It speaks to how these restrictive laws can have horrific and devastating effects on infant health, pregnant people, and on families overall—unintended or not.”

While many reproductive health studies (including ones that show a link among infant mortality and abortion bans) can only prove a correlation between factors, this one notably claims a direct causation, providing important evidence of the law’s dire impacts. “This study shows that the state policy is responsible for these deaths—there is a very, very strong causal link here,” says Gemmill.

?u=https%3A%2F%2Fc1.staticflickr.com%2F7%2F6035%2F6261666821_63ddf64c7d_b.jpg&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=7f82ebd0bebe97c641c29c05ca6e7db72fac184b8cbcc909e01dc503f779a90d&ipo=images

The Republican National Committee (RNC) released the party’s official 2024 platform on Monday, July 8, 2024. The platform focused on the economy, restoring election integrity, dealing with illegal immigration, and restoring a strong pro-American foreign policy. It noticeably de-emphasized the pro-life statement of the 2020 platform, leading some Pro-Life groups concerned.

The platform seems designed to capture as broad a base as possibly, potentially serving independents first and foremost by addressing economic and security needs over cultural ones (such as gay marriage and abortion, though the platform does include a pledge to end wokeness in all federally funded institutions).

Go to Article
Excerpt from redstate.com

 

On Monday the RNC’s Platform Committee adopted Donald Trump’s platform as the Republican Party platform for 2024 – and it’s been slimmed down from 66 pages to 20 bullet points.

Trump’s major themes of securing the border and ending the migrant crime epidemic, requiring voter ID and proof of citizenship to vote, strengthening the military, bringing the manufacturing industry back to the United States, and ending the weaponization of government are featured prominently. The platform also opposes any cuts to Social Security and Medicare, including opposition to raising the retirement age, and proposes middle class tax cuts and the “no tax on tips” point that Trump’s repeatedly brought up at rallies. It also emphasizes rebuilding America’s cities and making them “safe and clean” again.

As has been anticipated, the platform is silent on abortion and gay marriage, though the ongoing battle against radical gender ideology and sexualization of children is addressed in two bullet points:

CUT FEDERAL FUNDING FOR ANY SCHOOL PUSHING CRITICAL RACE THEORY, RADICAL GENDER IDEOLOGY, AND OTHER INAPPROPRIATE RACIAL, SEXUAL, OR POLITICAL CONTENT ON OUR CHILDREN

KEEP MEN OUT OF WOMEN’S SPORTS

Go to Article
Excerpt from trendingpoliticsnews.com

With just a week until the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee where former President Donald Trump is expected to be renominated as the Republican presidential candidate, the GOP has officially adopted a new platform that reinforces Trump’s deep influence on the party.

Today, the Republican National Committee (RNC) Platform Committee announced the approval of the 2024 Republican Party Platform, a robust agenda that starkly contrasts with the “record of weakness, failure, and dishonesty” of the current administration under Joe Biden. The platform outlined Trump’s blueprint for his potential second term, with a return to his “America First” policies.

The platform accuses past politicians of selling out American interests through unfavorable trade deals and neglecting national security, contributing to a broad range of domestic issues. Trump’s 2024 platform is reminiscent of his 2016 campaign promises, focusing heavily on economic growth, job creation, and a revival of American manufacturing. Trump also blamed the Biden administration for a host of woes including “raging inflation, open borders, rampant crime,” and a decline in global stability.

Key promises in the 2024 GOP Platform included:

  • Sealing the border and halting the “migrant invasion.”
  • Carrying out the largest deportation operation in U.S. history.
  • Ending inflation and enhancing affordability for Americans.
  • Reclaiming the title as the top global energy producer.
  • Transforming the U.S. into a manufacturing superpower, curtailing outsourcing.
  • Implementing significant tax cuts for workers and eliminating taxes on tips.
  • Defending constitutional rights including freedom of speech, religion, and gun ownership.
  • Aiming to prevent global conflicts and promising to build a comprehensive missile defense system.
  • Overhauling federal educational funding to exclude schools that promote what the GOP considers radical ideologies.
  • Ensuring election security through measures like voter ID laws and same-day voting.
?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.100daysinappalachia.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2021%2F01%2FStop-The-Steal-January-6th-2020-15.jpg&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=afa69a118489fd783553aef902869d4e1d9f17c22aaa9534cb53d9d99aec1373&ipo=images

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Justice Department’s interpretation of insurrection laws is not aligned with the constitution, meaning scores of January 6 Defendants could see their cases dismissed, charges reduced, and convicted J6ers could see their sentences reduced.

Go to Article
Excerpt from www.cbc.ca

The U.S. Supreme Court gave a boost on Friday to a Pennsylvania man who challenged an obstruction charge brought against him concerning the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol.

It’s a ruling that has potential implications for the federal criminal case against former U.S. president Donald Trump for trying to undo his 2020 election loss.

The justices ruled 6-3 to throw out a lower court’s decision that had allowed a charge against defendant Joseph Fischer of corruptly obstructing an official proceeding, that is, the congressional certification of President Joe Biden’s victory over Trump that the rioters sought to prevent. The justices directed the lower court to reconsider the matter.

Fischer, who was an officer with the North Cornwall township police in Pennsylvania at the time of the attack, was accused by prosecutors of charging at police guarding a Capitol entrance during the Jan. 6 riot. He had challenged the obstruction charge, which federal prosecutors brought against him and hundreds of others — including Trump — in Jan. 6-related cases.

Friday’s ruling was a setback for the U.S. Justice Department and Biden’s administration and a potential benefit for Trump.

?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.frontiersin.org%2Ffiles%2FArticles%2F679344%2Ffimmu-12-679344-HTML%2Fimage_m%2Ffimmu-12-679344-g006.jpg&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=85e173259585f21a40cfaa86dca2f170dd569a91000347d047925d5bf5e4463a&ipo=images

Prominent Canadian doctors have raised a red flag in Canada, alleging there is a 3000% increase in the percentage of unexplained deaths among children. The doctors announced the alarming statistic at an event called “An Injection of Truth.”

The doctors claimed “The increase in excess mortality, an increasingly strong positive correlation with the vaccination rate of a federal state is observed, which reaches a value of r = 0.85 in the third pandemic year, indicating that excess mortality increased the stronger the higher the vaccination rate in a federal state was. An analysis of stillbirths showed exactly the same pattern. No other systematic correlation pattern was observed.”

Go to Article
Excerpt from slaynews.com

A group of prominent Canadian medical doctors and scientists has just held a press conference to warn the public about a staggering spike in child deaths.

The doctors issued an emergency warning over an “alarming 3000% increase in unexplained child deaths.”

The press conference featured Dr. Byram Bridle, Dr. William Makis, Darrell Komick, Dr. Chris Shoemaker, Dr. David Speicher, and Dr. Mark Trozzi.

The doctors took questions from reporters about the surge in child deaths which emerged after the Covid mRNA shots rollout started in early 2021.

The presser was held on the morning after the landmark event “An Injection of Truth” in Calgary, Canada.

At the event, a delegation of Canadian medical doctors and scientists presented crucial scientific information.

They then held the press conference to alert the public about their findings.

?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwisconsinwatch.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2020%2F10%2Fmadison_ballot_box2-768x1024.jpg&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=84f660a3cf1537a32ef3101d34b207500a6a36a648d8911854a24885204da35b&ipo=images

The United Nations’ Secretary General  is calling for world governments to aggressively work to censor what he calls “hate speech,” which is interpreted by free speech advocates as a dog whistle for “thought control” given one man’s hate speech is another man’s truth.

The current Secretary General of the UN, Antonio Guterres, said “Hate speech is a marker of discrimination, abuse, violence, conflict, and even crimes against humanity. We have time and again seen this play out from Nazi Germany to Rwanda, Bosnia, and beyond. There is no acceptable level of hate speech; we must all work to eradicate it completely.”

Go to Article
Excerpt from slaynews.com

The unelected United Nations is demanding that the governments of “sovereign” nations around the world crack down on their citizens’ wrongthink by completely eradicating so-called “hate speech.”

The globalist leader of the UN, Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, issued a statement demanding the end of “hate speech,” which he describes as inherently toxic and entirely intolerable.

Guterres issued his statement to mark the occasion of the UN’s “International Day for Countering Hate Speech.”

The issue of censoring “hate speech” stirs significant controversy.

The agenda uses a nebulous and subjective definition of “hate” as a blanket meaning to attack unwelcome elements of free speech.

However, the globalists working to define what constitutes “hate speech” essentially hold the power to determine the limits of free expression and, therefore, eliminate criticism.

After the debate debacle caused doubts about President Biden’s competency, he was rushed to do interviews to show he is perfectly fine. One of those interviews was with Philadelphia radio host Andrea Lawful-Sanders, who exposed afterwards that she was given 8 questions ahead of time she should select from.

After her disclosure, she resigned after being encouraged to do so from her position at WURD radio, with the president and CEO of the radio station, Sara Lomax, saying “The interview featured pre-determined questions provided by the White House, which violates our practice of remaining an independent media outlet accountable to our listeners. As a result, Ms. Lawful-Sanders and WURD Radio have mutually agreed to part ways, effective immediately.”

Go to Article
Excerpt from townhall.com

President Joe Biden’s media campaign is under fire after a radio host revealed damning information that doesn’t help his case. 

CNN reporter Victor Blackwell pointed out that two separate radio hosts in two different states asked almost identical questions during their interview with Biden. 

Philadelphia radio host Andrea Lawful-Sanders revealed that Biden’s media team provided a list of questions to approve prior to the interview. She said she picked four pre-written questions from a list of eight submitted to her by the White House.

“Okay, so, the White House sent the questions to you ahead of the interview?” Blackwell asked.

“Yes, and I got several questions, eight of them. And the four that were chosen were the ones that I approved,” Lawful-Sanders confirmed. 

After receiving backlash, the Biden media team announced it would no longer provide pre-approved questions to interviewers. 

“While interview hosts have always been free to ask whatever questions they please, moving forward we will refrain from offering suggested questions,” Biden’s booking operation for media outlets said. 

However, despite already knowing, and I’m sure rehearsing answers to the pre-approved questions, Biden still stumbled over his words. 

During his interview with Lawful-Sanders, Biden claimed he was the “first black woman to serve with a black president.”

No wonder 72 percent of Americans think Biden is too old to serve in office another four years. 

It is not uncommon for the 81-year-old president to rely on help during public appearances. Biden has been known to use cheat sheets and teleprompters throughout his entire presidency. The president has also been caught using notecards with a list of approved reporters to call on during press conferences. 

?u=https%3A%2F%2Flive.staticflickr.com%2F5228%2F29829421110_c710ea2e3c.jpg&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=7fc5279967009ec4541b40c77976d157edbd1dc8b38f7fcd546d8260853319ab&ipo=images

U.S. Judge Aileen Cannon has granted numerous delays in the Classified Documents case against former President Donald Trump. The delays are expected to push the prosecution of this case until after the election. The delays were the result of the Supreme Court Ruling granting immunity to a President when executing “official” acts of the office.

Go to Article
Excerpt from amgreatness.com

On Saturday, the judge overseeing the classified documents case against former President Donald Trump ruled that several deadlines can be pushed back further, in another victory for the former president and his team.

Axios reports that the ruling by Judge Aileen Cannon grants a temporary stay on expert disclosures which were originally set for July 8th, as well as the reciprocal discovery by the defense originally scheduled for July 10th. Judge Cannon also set a new deadline of July 18th for Special Counsel Jack Smith and his team to respond to the Trump team’s motion to stay, as well as a request for a supplemental briefing; she gave both sides a deadline of July 21st to respond.

Judge Cannon’s ruling follows a historic ruling by the Supreme Court in late June which reaffirmed that President Trump has sweeping immunity from prosecution over his conduct while in office. The 6-3 ruling by the court’s conservative majority determined that he has absolute immunity for actions that fall within his “conclusive and preclusive” constitutional authority, as well as presumptive immunity for other official acts.

The Supreme Court’s ruling makes it nearly impossible for Special Counsel Smith, as well as Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, to prosecute Trump in their respective cases in Washington D.C., Florida, and Atlanta, Georgia. It also ensures that the cases will not go to trial before the November election, in which Trump is set to face Joe Biden in a rematch of the 2020 election.

President Trump and his team have also successfully delayed his sentencing in his Manhattan conviction; originally scheduled for July 11th, just days before the Republican National Convention, District Attorney Alvin Bragg and Judge Juan Merchan have agreed to reschedule the hearing for September 18th.

?u=https%3A%2F%2Fpeoplesdispatch.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2024%2F07%2FFront-Populaire-Jeunes-Insoumises-500x281.jpg&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=b9e2f14aef8e6c849236ba9769b6ce50382bdf7108c5a5eaf8717fbc471028ca&ipo=images

As expected, the far-left Labour Party of Britain won a super majority of parliament seats despite getting less than 40 percent of the vote. In France, the right was expected to triumph, but a deal with the far-far-left and the far-left gave the French an even more extreme leftist government than they had before. The party that won the most votes, Marine Le Pen’s National Party, only garnered enough parliament seats to rank third.

Go to Article
Excerpt from www.breitbart.com

The French election results showed that the “alliance of dishonour” between President Emmanuel Macron and the far left effectively blocked the populist National Rally from gaining a majority despite the Le Pen party having won the most votes.

According to the French Interior Ministry, Marine Le Pen’s National Rally (RN) won the most votes of any party during Sunday’s second round of the snap legislative elections at over 8.7 million, good for 32.05 per cent of the vote.

When combined with their electoral alliance partners from disputed Les Républicains president Eric Ciotti, who earned nearly 1.4 million, good for 5 per cent of the vote, that would take the right wing to over 10 million and 37.05 per cent of the vote.

In comparison, the far-left New Popular Front alliance of communists, socialists, and environmentalists led by radical leftist Jean-Luc Mélenchon only received around seven million votes or around 25.7 per cent and Emmanuel Macron’s neo-liberal centrist coalition received 6.3 million votes or 23.15 per cent of the vote.

However, despite receiving 1.7 million fewer votes than RN, the New Popular Front was awarded the most seats of any party, currently projected by Le Monde at 182. Macron’s coalition won an estimated 168 seats, and despite coming in first in terms of vote share, the RN and its partners were awarded the third most seats at a projected 143.

Go to Article
Excerpt from www.npr.org

With far-right parties ascendant in France and elsewhere in Europe, the United Kingdom has swung in the opposite direction. Official election results Friday showed a landslide victory for the country’s center-left Labour Party — its first victory in 19 years, since under the leadership of Tony Blair.

Incoming Prime Minister Keir Starmer hailed his win as historic, saying early Friday: “Change begins now.”

Later Friday, he gave his first speech outside the prime minister’s residence at 10 Downing Street, saying, he will lead a “government of service” on a “mission of national renewal” and promised to “rebuild Britain.”

For the Conservatives — the party of Margaret Thatcher, Boris Johnson and outgoing Prime Minister Rishi Sunak — it was the worst defeat in their party’s nearly 200-year history. Prominent lawmakers including former Prime Minister Liz Truss, Jacob Rees-Mogg and Penny Mordaunt lost their seats in Parliament. Sunak retained his seat but resigned Friday as Conservative Party leader, and apologized to the country.

“I am sorry. I have given this job my all but you have sent a clear signal, that the government of the United Kingdom must change,” Sunak told reporters as he and his wife left the prime minister’s residence at 10 Downing Street for the last time. “I have heard your anger, your disappointment and I take responsibility for this loss.”

?u=https%3A%2F%2Fhaitiantimes.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2021%2F04%2FIMG_0807-scaled.jpg&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=3d9cab83ebd80374a9a98eb79e980a466369798a9d72bd19608c4a9fd243e99b&ipo=images

13 House “Republicans” joined the party of sedition, the Democrat Party, in striking down a spending amendment that would end the funding of programs that set up shop in foreign countries and directly import replacements for ALL Americans (not just the white ones, my fellow Americans).

The amendment was introduced by Representative Glenn Grothman (-R-WI) but failed to pass thanks to the 13 quisling Republicans that voted for the Democrat Party’s ongoing efforts to destroy our Republic. They demonstrate once again the level of corruption in our government that goes far beyond the elephant and the donkey.

Go to Article

Excerpt from conservativeroof.com

In a surprising move, a group of House Republicans joined Democrats to maintain funding for President Joe Biden’s parole pipeline, which facilitates the transport of hundreds of thousands of migrants into the United States.

On Wednesday, 13 Republicans joined 205 Democrats to block an amendment by Rep. Glenn Grothman (R-WI) to a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) funding bill, which aimed to defund President Biden’s parole pipeline.

The CHNV program, known as the parole pipeline, allows Cuban, Haitian, Nicaraguan, and Venezuelan migrants to book their own flights from their home countries after being screened by the federal government. These migrants then fly into American airports to obtain what is termed “humanitarian parole.”

The consulting firm Klaros Group has conducted an audit of U.S. banks which shows 282 American banks are at risk of collapse as a result of the continued losses they are taking from commercial real estate loans, loans issued out a low interest rates before the rise of inflation and the spiking of the interest rate by the Federal Reserve. The figure represents 7 percent of U.S. banks.

Go to Article
Excerpt from wltreport.com

Hundreds of banks around the United States are in danger of closing.

Consulting firm Klaros Group conducted an audit, which revealed that 282 banks are in danger of closing due to commercial real estate loans and losses connected to higher interest rates.

Brian Graham, the co-founder of Klaros Group, stated, “Most of these banks aren’t insolvent or even close to insolvent. They’re just stressed.”

The Klaros Group’s audit also noted the bank’s refusal to open new branches, implement technological innovations, and hire new staff mebers also will play a role in the bank’s potential closures.

?u=https%3A%2F%2Flive.staticflickr.com%2F8629%2F28632362435_10efe3fa26_b.jpg&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=ad200860ebf582b49f2a8b6eb913e9ae05a5de65420db014fb62020cef0e68ab&ipo=images

The DNC is paying a law firm to sue Donald Trump. The law firm represented E. Jean Carroll in her lawsuit she won thanks to a corrupt kangaroo court proceeding that saw the former President’s basic due process rights violated. The findings were brought to light by Daily Caller’s investigation of FEC filings. The finding also comes after DNC spokesperson Alex Floyd told media in April that “The DNC does not spend a single penny of grassroots donors’ money on legal bills.”

Go to Article
Excerpt from conservativeroof.com

The Democratic National Committee (DNC) has funneled millions of dollars to law firms actively involved in an aggressive lawfare campaign against President Donald Trump.

The information came to light after a comprehensive review of Federal Election Commission (FEC) records conducted by the Daily Caller.


According to FEC filings, since August 2021, the DNC has allocated nearly $2 million to Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP for ‘legal services’. Roberta A. Kaplan, a founding partner of the firm, gained recognition for representing E. Jean Carroll in her lawsuits alleging sexual assault and defamation by Trump. Interestingly, prior to August 2021, the DNC had not engaged this firm for any services since its establishment in 2017.

The timing and details of these payments are raising questions, especially since Joshua Matz, another partner at Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP, served as counsel for the House Judiciary Committee during both of Trump’s impeachment trials.

It’s worth noting that both Judge Kaplan and Roberta Kaplan, who are not related, previously worked together at the same prestigious law firm in the early 1990s.

This connection was discovered by Charles Gasparino, a columnist for The New York Post, who followed a lead suggesting that Judge Kaplan had once mentored Roberta Kaplan.

From 1992 until 2016, Roberta Kaplan was affiliated with the law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkin, Wharton & Garrison. Coincidentally, Judge Lewis Kaplan also served as a partner at the same firm during this period.

Judge Kaplan was a partner until he was appointed to the federal bench in 1994, while Roberta Kaplan remained at the firm until 2016 before establishing her own firm, Kaplan Hecker & Fink.

Adding to the controversy, it was discovered that Shawn Crowley, one of Carroll’s main attorneys, reportedly worked as a law clerk for Judge Kaplan in the past. Additionally, it has been revealed that the judge co-officiated Crowley’s wedding.

Furthermore, according to FEC filings examined by the Daily Caller, the DNC has paid several million dollars to Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP since 2021. This firm has a longstanding association with the DNC and has submitted numerous Amicus briefs in the ongoing United States v. Donald Trump case before the Supreme Court.

This revelation directly contradicts a statement made by DNC spokesperson Alex Floyd in April, who claimed, “The DNC does not spend a single penny of grassroots donors’ money on legal bills.”

Share your thoughts by scrolling down to leave a comment.

?u=http%3A%2F%2Ffabiusmaximus.files.wordpress.com%2F2012%2F12%2F20121224-cia.jpg&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=9847e7fba05451be563c4408239894b36f72818c09beb4be0adc1b14e8bcfd7a&ipo=images

The evidence is now clear that while 51 former intelligence officials signed a letter stating the Hunter Biden laptop was not real, that it was a Russian disinformation campaign, they all knew they were lying, lying to advance the coup that was the 2020 Mass Mailer Election (which is no election at all).

The House Judiciary Committee released a statement on their findings, claiming, “High ranking CIA officials, up to and including then-CIA Director Gina Haspel, were made aware of the Hunter Biden statement prior to its approval and publication. Because several former senior intelligence officials signed the statement, the PCRB sent the draft statement to the CIA’s then-Chief Operating Officer (COO) Andrew Makridis, who said he subsequently informed then-Director Haspel or then Deputy Director Vaughn Frederick Bishop that the statement would be published soon. Senior CIA leadership had an opportunity at that time to slow down the CIA’s process for reviewing publication submissions and ensure that such an extraordinary statement was properly vetted.”

Go to Article
Excerpt from conservativeroof.com

The House Judiciary Committee disclosed on Tuesday that CIA contractors collaborated with the Biden campaign in 2020 to undermine the credibility of Hunter Biden’s laptop.

In October 2020, just days before the presidential election, 51 former intelligence officials signed and released a letter alleging without evidence that the contents of Hunter Biden’s controversial laptop bore “all the hallmarks of a Russian disinformation campaign.”

This falsehood was known to be untrue by all involved. Despite this, the mainstream media still propagated the story and even used it during the debate to criticize President Trump.

?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.northcarolinahealthnews.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2020%2F12%2FTurkeisha_Shot-450x275.png&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=34f63d9804c22ebe02e03357a7f95bb915d57b51c369a8cbaa8e8507fdef43cd&ipo=images

A report from the Subcommittee on the Administrative State, Regulatory Reform, and Antitrust claims the Biden administration was the main impetus behind the FDA’s decision to fast-track an experimental mRNA drug for Covid-19, despite knowing full well they would push for vaccine mandates.

One of the members of congress behind the report, Subcommittee Chairman Thomas Massie (R-KY) accused the FDA of cutting corners to enable the Biden administration to more hastily enact the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) used to justify the vaccine mandates. Massie said, “Exposing and acknowledging mistakes that were made is a necessary step toward restoring integrity and trust in our regulatory agencies.”

Go to Article
Excerpt from amgreatness.com

A new report from the House of Representatives claims that the Biden Administration repeatedly pressured the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) into speeding up the approval of the Chinese Coronavirus vaccine developed by Pfizer.

According to the Daily Caller, the staff report from the Subcommittee on the Administrative State, Regulatory Reform, and Antitrust alleges that the FDA did not follow the usual regulatory guidelines when it came to approving the Pfizer vaccine. As such, when the FDA gave its approval to the vaccine, it allowed the Biden Administration to more quickly issue a mandate forcing federal workers and active duty troops to take the Pfizer vaccine or else risk losing their jobs.

In a statement issued by the House Judiciary Committee, which oversees the subcommittee in question, the committee further explained that the Biden Administration intended to “fully approve the Pfizer vaccine through the Biologics Licensing Application (BLA) process.” Although this process normally takes “ten months to a year,” or “six to eight months” if it’s a priority, the approval of the Pfizer vaccine took less than four months after Pfizer first filed its application.

The FBI admitted, through a filing with the special lawfare assassin, Jack Smith, that they not only turned off their cameras to conduct the raid, they also staged the “evidence” to make it appear Trump left sensitive evidence out in the open.

The lawfare assassin himself, Jack Smith, confessed to the crime, stating “At that point, the team began using blank sheets of paper with handwritten annotations to identify the document. The information generally included the document title, classification level, a description of the subject matter, document identification numbers, and/or fates in the document… As part of the processing of seized documents marked classified, ERT photographed the documents (with appropriate cover sheets added by FBI personnel) next to the box in which they were located.”

Go to Article
Excerpt from thepostmillennial.com

Biden admin special counsel Jack Smith on Monday filed a motion urging the judge in the Mar-a-Lago documents case to throw out Trump’s motion to dismiss the case based on “spoliation of evidence in violation of due process.” The Trump motion from early June alleged that the FBI, during its 2022 raid of Trump’s Palm Peach estate, destroyed “important exculpatory evidence relating to the locations of the allegedly classified documents at issue.”

The filing from Smith stated that during the execution of the search warrant, “At approximately 9:55 am, the CCTV servers were turned off to prevent recording, at the request of the FBI, out of concern for agent safety.” Independent journalist Julie Kelly, who has done extensive reporting on the cases against Trump and J6 defendants, noted the section on X. “At approximately 10:20 am, recording resumed, at the direction of Trump attorneys.”

The section continued on to state that during the time recording was paused, “the cameras continued to display a live feed, and some Trump Organization personnel who had access to the network feed monitored it live.” The filing noted that before the cameras ceased recording, DOJ attorney Bratt tried once to reach a Trump attorney over the phone unsuccessfully, and successfully did so on the second call. The filing also noted that the search was initiated at around 10:33 am.

?u=https%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fcommons%2Fthumb%2Ff%2Ff2%2FAmy_Coney_Barrett_official_portrait.jpg%2F330px-Amy_Coney_Barrett_official_portrait.jpg&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=ea36186375fba6a6075dd29089ae39c6fcce5d7be95e954723f55eb998d1c53e&ipo=images

In a ruling that made it clear to Americans that the problem of insurrection isn’t just a Democrat one, it’s also a Republican one, 6 Supreme Court Justices from both the left and the right gave the Biden administration the green light to continue to pressure private companies to silence their dissenters.

The court ruled that Americans don’t have standing to challenge the unconstitutional action, playing a semantic word game arguing this is not an affirmation of the action’s constitutionality but merely a rejection of the people bringing suit to bring suit in the first place. The ruling exposes the Uniparty level of corruption Americans face in their battle to restore the republic from foreign enemies, especially those from within our own nation, Democrats and Republicans siding with totalitarianism.

Amy Comey Barrett revealed she is either compromised or an insurrectionist plant all along, giving the majority opinion in words that defy fact and logic. She claimed, “Putting these requirements together, the plaintiffs must show a substantial risk that, in the near future, at least one platform will restrict the speech of at least one plaintiff in response to the actions of at least one Government defendant. Here, at the preliminary injunction stage, they must show that they are likely to succeed in carrying that burden. On the record in this case, that is a tall order.”

Go to Article
Excerpt from legalinsurrection.com

The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to toss Murthy v. Missouri, which accused President Joe Biden’s administration of pressuring social media companies to censor COVID “misinformation.”

Missouri and Louisiana, along with five citizens, filed a lawsuit against the administration in 2022.

Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, and Justice Amy Coney Barrett voted in the affirmative.

?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwisconsinwatch.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2020%2F09%2Frib_mountain_sample_ballot-1536x1024.jpg&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=0aa4ea81fd04fa2c9aa47b08e7d2907ddcb549cc93c9e29f69d11033140f7145&ipo=images

In a victory within a defeat, the Michigan GOP was able to secure a win from a Michigan judge that would prevent a secret order by far-left anti-Americanist activist and Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson from taking effect. That order would allow election ballot counters to disregard the legally required process of signature verification before they do so.

The ruling, however, does nothing to touch the voter disenfranchising tactic of mass mailer “voting” in the first place. It merely makes it slightly harder for the Democrats of the fallen state of Michigan to count the votes they need to win, no matter how the American people actually voted.

Go to Article
Excerpt from redstate.com

… I’m happy to report that with the removal of Karamo months ago and the election of Pete Hoekstra, the party statewide is now positioning itself to be competitive. The more blue states that Biden has to compete in, like Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, the better it is for Donald Trump come election day.

This press release below shows that a number of Republican organizations are working together to ding the current Democrat Secretary of State here in Michigan, Jocelyn Benson, for her sloppy attention to detail with voter signatures.

Here is said RNC Press Release:

The RNC, Michigan GOP, and NRCC have won a major victory to protect mail ballots in Michigan. We discovered that Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson issued secret instructions to election officials to disregard signature verification requirements and instead “presume the validity” of signatures. We filed suit to protect these important safeguards. The court agreed with us, holding that the Secretary’s instructions are unlawful and that officials cannot presume the validity of signatures.

RNC Chairman Michael Whatley stated: “This RNC legal victory confirms the importance of mail ballot safeguards in Michigan’s Constitution. The Secretary of State’s covert attempts to sidestep these rules were rightfully rejected by the court, exposing that her attacks on election integrity have no substance. This win is just the latest development in our ongoing fight to promote fair and transparent elections in the Great Lakes State.”

?u=https%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fcommons%2Fc%2Fcf%2FSeal_of_the_Attorney_General_of_Missouri.jpg&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=64d25414dbe0cc5da1db7d707d36f3f750bac507d90f283858360fcbe687fd6c&ipo=images

The Attorney General of Missouri, Andrew Bailey, announced plans to bring a lawsuit against the State of New York for its ongoing effort to use lawfare to destroy the main opposition to their party’s White House power, Donald J Trump.

Bailey said, “We have to fight back against a rogue prosecutor who is trying to take a presidential candidate off the campaign trail. It sabotages Missourians’ right to a free and fair election. Stay tuned.”

Go to Article
Excerpt from www.westernjournal.com

Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey announced Friday that his state will be filing a lawsuit against New York state over the way it persecuted former President Donald Trump in the recent trial that resulted in Trump’s conviction on charges of falsifying business records.

“I will be filing suit against the State of New York for their direct attack on our democratic process through unconstitutional lawfare against President Trump,” Bailey, a Republican, posted on X. “It’s time to restore the rule of law.”

“We have to fight back against a rogue prosecutor who is trying to take a presidential candidate off the campaign trail. It sabotages Missourians’ right to a free and fair election,” he wrote in another post, adding “Stay tuned.”

?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.privateinternetaccess.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2020%2F01%2Fdepartment-of-homeland-security-cisa-1200x630.jpg%3Fx23951&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=bc88a73230bfa388f225c18aaf23e7c9f3c42d413a891a47025c1a5df6683a44&ipo=images

The captured U.S. government department, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) formed a group called the “Homeland Intelligence Experts Group” to allegedly hunt Trump supporters and charge them with anything to destroy their lives in the hope that it would silence dissent.

The allegation was made by America First Legal, who exposed the group, which was quickly then disbanded. They called the group “a completely partisan group designed to provide top cover the Department’s radical agenda.” The self-professed purpose of the group was to target people that might commit “domestic violent extremist” attacks. The people they put in that category were Trump supports, members of the military, and Christians.

Go to Article
Excerpt from amgreatness.com

A now disbanded group in Joe Biden’s Department Homeland Security (DHS) classified Trump supporters, members of the military, and people with religious views as persons likely to commit “domestic violent extremist” attacks, newly released internal files show.

DHS announced the formation of the “Homeland Intelligence Experts Group” in September 2023 to “provide advice and perspectives on intelligence and national security efforts” to the Department, but according to America First Legal, “it was a completely partisan group designed to provide top cover for the Department’s radical agenda

AFL and former Ambassador Richard Grenell filed a lawsuit against the Homeland Intelligence Experts Group soon after the group was announced, and spurred Republican members of Congress to take action against it.

AFL alleged that the group comprised of partisan actors violated the Federal Advisory Committee Act for various reasons — including its lack of balance, the Biden Administration’s inappropriate influence over it, and its lack of public notice and participation, among other things.

To avoid further litigation and scrutiny, the Biden regime agreed in May to disband the illegal group and provide its records to AFL. However, the group may have been active for a year before it was pressured to shut down.

“By the time the Homeland Intelligence Experts Group was announced in September 2023, the group had already been meeting for as long as four months,” AFL reported.

Members of the deep state cabal included former Obama intelligence officials and Russia collusion hoaxers John Brennan and James Clapper—both signatories of the infamous “Letter of 51,” which mislead the American public on the veracity of the Hunter Biden laptop story ahead of the 2020 election.

Also included in the unit were former Obama official Francis Taylor,  Asha George, Rajesh De, Caryn Wagner, and Elisa Massimino, all of whom contributed exclusively to Democrat candidates for political office.

During a meeting in September on “Collection Posture and Associated Challenges,” the partisan group discussed ways to get around the Constitutional limits to their domestic intelligence gathering goals.

One idea they came up with was expanding DHS’s reach into local communities in an “ambiguous” and “non-threatening” way to encourage teachers and parents to report on their conservative neighbors and children. The group sought to reclassifying political dissent as a “public health” issue so that “mothers and teachers” could feel comfortable coming forward.

 

They also proposed that people be tagged with “in the military” and “religious” labels to profile them as having “indicators of extremists and terrorism” as a pretext to allow DHS to spy on them. The group said “we should be more worried about these” individuals [than left-wing extremist groups like antifa and the millions of unvetted illegal aliens DHS has allowed to cross the southern border].

 

The group went on to discuss how “most of the Domestic Terrorism threat now comes from supporters of the former president [Donald Trump].

 

This isn’t the first time the Biden regime has been caught engaging in abusive and partisan intelligence collection.

In April 2022, DHS announced the formation of an “Disinformation Governance Board” (DGB) to respond to matters the government unilaterally determined to be mis-, dis- or mal-information (MDM)—specifically information that countered official regime narratives on “the origins and effects of COVID-19 vaccines,” “the efficacy of masks,” the validity of the 2020 election,” and “falsehoods surrounding U.S. Government immigration policy.”

DHS disbanded the Disinformation Governance Board and its director, Nina Jankowicz, resigned in disgrace after an massive outcry from conservatives, who compared the board to an Orwellian “Ministry of Truth.”

?u=https%3A%2F%2Flive.staticflickr.com%2F137%2F338616383_379faf3a16_n.jpg&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=0db9ab43c94e7b1c53df6a70d9b2f763b6cd9d81ba517012c32724036b526901&ipo=images

The Supreme Court made a shocking decision by an even more shocking margin, 8-1, that upholds de facto Star Chamber convictions of Americans, allowing courts to take firearms from Americans for merely being accused of committing a domestic violence crime.

Leading insurrectionist judge, Chief Justice Roberts said of the ruling, “Our tradition of firearm regulation allows the government to disarm individuals who present a credible threat to the physical safety of others,” a standard that is not based on due process but unconstitutional precedent.

The lone holdout was perhaps the last true American SCOTUS judge, Clarence Thomas, who said of the ruling “The court and government do not point to a single historical law revoking a citizen’s Second Amendment right based on possible interpersonal violence. Yet, in the interest of ensuring the Government can regulate one subset of society, today’s decision puts at risk the Second Amendment rights of many more.”

Go to Article
Excerpt from www.breitbart.com

The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) upheld on Friday a federal ban on gun ownership for subjects of domestic violence restraining orders.

The case centered on Zackey Rahimi, who had been barred from gun possession under a 1994 law prohibiting gun possession by those subject to the aforementioned restraining orders.

NBC News suggested SCOTUS’s decision shows there are some gun controls that can survive the Bruen (2022) test.

CNN quoted Chief Justice John Roberts indicating he and seven of his colleagues had “no trouble” coming together on this decision.

?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.emergency-live.com%2Fit%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2021%2F03%2FPfizer-BioNTech-vaccino-covid-vaccini.jpg&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=99c389f67e810fdf12057ee22f226d2140cf5620e22503e538a3c8ec9768acf3&ipo=images

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla not only continues to walk free despite representing a criminal operation that allegedly intentionally poisoned America with their mRNA Covid-19 vaccine, he continues to work to create the second round of poisoning, promising shareholders the best days are behind him as Covid-19 was just a rehearsal.

The tone-deaf alleged mass murder tweeted out “I truly think that the best days of Pfizer are ahead of us, because Covid was form me was like a rehearsal.” To rewrite this, “There is another plandemic on the horizon and the DNC-controlled government will assure we can get captured customers we cannot only gain great monetary profit from, we can also kill.”

Go to Article
Excerpt from slaynews.com

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla has admitted that the Covid pandemic and mRNA shot rollout was just a “rehearsal” for something far larger.

Bourla made the admission while gloating about Pfizer’s future as a vaccine maker.

The pharmaceutical kingpin was defending his company over reports that Pfizer’s “best days” are now in the past since the Covid pandemic was over.

“I truly think that the best days of Pfizer are ahead of us, because Covid was for me was like a rehearsal.”

He then continued to boast that Pfizer can now rapidly roll out mRNA shots in response to the next “main disease.”

Bourla then suggested that Covid seems insignificant because Pfizer is now “after cancer and many other things in the years to come.”

WATCH:

?u=https%3A%2F%2Fjournalistsresource.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F12%2FHospice-care-iStock.jpg&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=854ce87b80e43daf60a6e154b8248e646fd0e300313e13376f140efb51ef06e9&ipo=images

The Delaware Legislature has rejected a bill that would have legalized so-called physician-assisted suicide. The bill was defeated on June 20 in the Senate after passing the House in April.

The turning point for the bill came from an investigative report that shows physician-assisted suicide laws always start with limited scope but are continuously increased to include more and more exceptions and include more and more groups that could be eligible for “legalized suicide.”

Go to Article
Excerpt from www.lifenews.com

On Wednesday, June 12, the Delaware State Senate debated assisted suicide Bill HB 140. The last online presenter was Kim Callinan, the President of the assisted suicide group, Compassion & Choices. In her presentation Callinan lied three times about key issues.

The first lie was that there have been no abuses of the law.

An article by Jennifer Brown that was published in the Colorado Sun on March 14 reported that Dr. Jennifer Gaudiani, an internal medicine doctor who specializes in eating disorders published a paper on how she prescribed assisted suicide for three people with anorexia nervosa in Colorado. Gaudiani approves assisted suicide for Anorexia Nervosa by falsely defining the condition as terminal.

Kevin Dias, the Chief Legal Advocacy Officer for Compassion & Choices  responded to the Colorado Sun article by stating that:

Medical aid-in-dying laws apply only to mentally capable, terminally ill patients with six months or less to live who are able to self-ingest the medication. Any deviation from these requirements violates the law and places physicians, family members and others in regulatory, civil and criminal jeopardy. This law does not and was never intended to apply to a person whose only diagnosis is anorexia nervosa.

?u=https%3A%2F%2Fjournalistsresource.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2018%2F03%2FRegister-to-vote.jpg&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=ab2ac260f45357c044bf933757077908fb35b3926363d9492950b39df9564f8e&ipo=images

A far-left Nevada Judge, Mary Kay Holthus, could not bring herself to violate the rule of law in order to proceed with a lawfare case targeting GOP alternate electors for prosecution. The judge dismissed the case because the alleged crime did not happen in her far-left-dominated county, but rather it occurred in a GOP stronghold county.

The prosecution appears to have wanted to ram through the case in a DNC friendly county knowing it would have a hard time getting Republicans to violate the Rule of Law. The statute of limitations has now expired, meaning the prosecutors cannot legally continue to pursue this case unless they want to openly defy America’s Rule of Law for the good of the insurrectionist party, the DNC.

Go to Article
Excerpt from thepostmillennial.com

A Nevada judge has dismissed the alternate electors’ case against allies of Donald Trump in Nevada over concerns with jurisdiction. Judge Mary Kay Holthus dismissed the charges against the six Nevada Republicans in the decision.

On Friday morning, Judge Mary Kay Holthus told prosecutors that she remained unconvinced that Clark County was the appropriate jurisdiction to hear the case. “You have literally, in my opinion, a crime that has occurred in another jurisdiction,” Holthus stated. “It’s so appropriately up north and so appropriately not here,” according to The Daily Indy.