May 1, 2026

Election Law

Media Pushing Another Fake News Story about Trump Making Fun of Dead U.S. Soldier– lidblog.com
Source Link
Excerpt:

Fake news purveyor (that means liar) Jeffrey Goldberg is making a stab at an “October surprise” to help Democrats win the 2024 election with a false story about Trump supposedly disparaging a U,S, soldier who died in service.

Goldberg published his latest lie in The Atlantic with the claim that Trump made fun of a slain Mexican-American Army private when he was president the first time. The partisan liar claimed that the story came from Natalie Khawam, the attorney for the family of the slain soldier, 20-year-old Vanessa Guillén.

Guillén was murdered in 2020 by another soldier at Fort Hood. When her body was discovered and preparations were made to bury the soldier, Trump reportedly disparaged the dead soldier.

“It doesn’t cost 60,000 bucks to bury a fucking Mexican!” Goldberg claims Trump said of the Mexican-American soldier.

Illegal Migrants in Swing States May Decide Presidential Race › American Greatness– amgreatness.com
Source Link
Excerpt:

A border security and immigration expert is warning that the Biden administration has engaged in an all-out blitz to use federal agencies to get non-citizens registered to vote, especially in swing states.

Lora Reis is the former director of the Heritage Foundation’s Border Security and Immigration Center told Armstrong Williams that the current administration has encouraged federal agencies, including the Social Security Administration to register to vote, everyone with whom they come in contact, regardless of citizenship status.

Testimony from a former special prosecutor, Nathan Wade, suggests the Biden-Harris White House has been not only colluding with local and state Soros-funded DAs to lawfare assault former President Donald Trump, they even groomed their future lawfare assassins and walked them through the whole process.

Wade pleaded a bad memory when confronted by the House Judiciary Committee but acknowledged the multiple times he wrote invoices for Fulton County to pay for meetings with the White House Counsel. When confronted with another example, he would say, “I don’t remember it happening. I know that it did because the entry says that it did.”

Trump Prosecutor Met with Biden-Harris White House Multiple Times, According to Newly Released Testimony– www.westernjournal.com
Source Link
Excerpt:

A now-ousted special prosecutor against former President Donald Trump in Fulton County, Georgia, might have been his own worst witness when it comes to President Joe Biden’s White House.

Nathan Wade, who was booted from his role overseeing the Trump prosecution because of a romantic relationship with Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, confirmed in a newly released deposition that he’d had lengthy meetings with the Biden White House while still on the Trump case.

But he claimed he can’t remember a thing about them — while he was paid $250 an hour for his time.

In the Oct. 15 grilling by the House Judiciary Committee, a transcript shows, Wade was confronted with invoices showing he had billed Fulton County taxpayers repeatedly for conferences with Biden White House counsel.

One, dated May 23, 2022, indicated a trip to Athens, Georgia — a distance of about 70 miles from Atlanta — as well as a “conf with White House counsel.”

Yet Wade claimed he could not remember who from the White House was present or even whether the “conf” took place by phone or in person.

At another point, the transcript cites an invoice for “Interview with D.C./White House, November 18th, 2022. Eight hours at $250. Cost $2,000.”

Wade again had little to add: “I don’t remember it happening. I know that it did because the entry says that it did,” he said in the deposition.

That was followed by a series of questions about who was present, what was discussed, and even whether Wade had traveled to Washington for the interview or if someone from the White House had come to him in Georgia.

Are the indictments against Trump politically motivated?

To all, Wade answered with some version of “I don’t recall.”

At still another point, Wade was asked about an invoice in which he billed Fulton taxpayers $6,000 for three days’ work from Sept. 7-9, 2022 for “Witness interview; conf call D.C.; team meeting.”

Again, Wade could not recall anything about the “conf call.”

In total, as Townhall noted, Wade used the phrases “I don’t recall,” “I can’t recall,” or “I don’t know” almost 60 times.

What is clear, however, is that Wade met with the Biden White House repeatedly while conducting a prosecution of the man the Biden White House feared as Biden’s most potent political opposition.

Related:

Harvard Pollster: Trump’s Brilliant Campaign Strategy Could Devastate Democrats ‘for Years to Come’

The fact that Wade claims not to recall anything about those meetings has its own problems.

Wade was being paid handsomely by Fulton County taxpayers for his mental acumen. Lawyers who make $250 an hour are generally expected to have a fairly high-grade intelligence, which generally translates to a reasonably good memory.

To a reasonable American, a man in Wade’s position who claims he can’t remember such important matters as when meetings take place and who attended — when those meetings involve the White House and a crucial front in the Democratic legal war on Trump — is not being very convincing.

In fact, it gives the impression that he’s got something to hide. And that makes him about the worst witness possible.

 

Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.

Federal Appeals Court Upholds Trespassing Charge Used Against Hundreds of January 6 Rioters
Source Link
Excerpt:

A split federal appeals court panel on Tuesday upheld a trespassing charge against a January 6 rioter, Couy Griffin — a charge that has also been applied to hundreds of others — affirming that rioters “knowingly” breached restricted areas that day even if they didn’t know the basis of that restriction — that the Secret Service was protecting then-Vice President Pence, who was inside.

At issue in the case before the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals was a federal law that prohibits “knowingly” entering “restricted building or grounds,” defined as any “posted, cordoned off, or otherwise restricted area,” including restricted areas where the “president or other person protected by the Secret Service” is visiting.

Mr. Griffin, a founder of Cowboys for Trump and a former New Mexico county commissioner who was ousted from his position under the 14th Amendment’s insurrection clause, had argued that the government must prove that he knew the reason why the area was restricted for him to have “knowingly entered.” He also argued that because so many rioters before him had trampled the signage along the area, the restricted grounds were no longer clearly “posted, cordoned off, or otherwise restricted.”

More than 1,400 January 6 defendants have been charged with “entering or remaining” on restricted federal grounds, the Justice Department has said, meaning that hundreds of charges could have been undermined if the court had ruled in Mr. Griffin’s favor.

Biden Calls To ‘Lock’ Up Trump. Immediately Attempts Backtracking From Statement.– americanactionnews.com
Source Link
Excerpt:

President Joe Biden said Tuesday at New Hampshire’s Democratic National Committee (DNC) office that the party needs to “lock up” former President Donald Trump, quickly adding he meant to “politically” lock him up.

Since 2019, Democrats have been calling for Trump to be behind bars, flipping the script on their previous criticism of Republicans and the former president for calling for former Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton to be locked up. While speaking to the DNC office in Concord, New Hampshire, Biden noted how close the race is becoming, claiming Trump believes he has immunity from “physically eliminating” threats.

“All of it’s on a knife’s edge. It’s on a knife’s edge right now. So this is really, really, really, really important right now. Folks, look, think about it. He is talking about doing away with the entire Department of Education — he means it, this is not a joke. This [is] a guy who also wants to replace every civil servant, every single one,” Biden said.

Rudy Giuliani Has Been Ordered to Hand Over Manhattan Apartment, Luxury Watches, Valuables- to Georgia Election Workers– wltreport.com
Source Link
Excerpt:

Rudy Giuliani has been ordered to turn over a large amount of valuables, his Penthouse apartment in Manhattan, and a load of sentimental belongings — and potentially more properties that have yet to be determined — by a federal judge.

The property and valuables will be given to Georgia election workers who won a defamation suit against Giuliani for statements he made questioning the integrity of the vote count — specifically the allegation made by Giuliani that Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss allegedly committed election fraud when counting ballots in Fulton County, Georgia during the 2020 election.

The following is a CNN report with Michael Gottlieb, the attorney for the Georgia election workers, on the judgment and the assets included in the decision by the judge requiring Giuliani to hand over these specific items to be auctioned off and sold to satisfy the judgment awarded to them.

JUST IN: Bar Complaint Filed Against Liz Cheney For Secretly Communicating with J6 ‘Star Witness’ Cassidy Hutchinson | The Gateway Pundit– www.thegatewaypundit.com
Source Link
Excerpt:

A bar complaint was filed against Liz Cheney for secretly communicating with J6 ‘star witness’ Cassidy Hutchinson while she was being represented by attorney Stefan Passantino.

America First Legal filed a bar complaint on behalf of Stefan Passantino against Liz Cheney for violating professional ethics obligations by secretly messaging Cassidy Hutchinson prior to her testimony to the J6 Committee.

“Cheney appears to have violated the D.C. Bar Rule of Professional Conduct 4.2: “a lawyer shall not communicate or cause another to communicate about the subject of the representation with a person known to be represented by another lawyer in the matter, unless the lawyer has the prior consent of the lawyer representing such other person or is authorized by law or a court order to do so.”” America First Legal said.

“Ms. Hutchinson appears to have been pressured by Ms. Cheney and others into manufacturing a narrative that Passantino had sought to influence her testimony in an effort to protect former President Trump — a claim that Passantino has denied,” AFL said.

Fulton County DA asks appeals court to restore three election subversion charges against Donald Trump – MSN
Source Link
Excerpt:

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis has asked the state’s Court of Appeals to reinstate six counts in the election subversion case against Donald Trump and his co-defendants, including three specifically against the former president.

The court filing brings the aftermath of the 2020 presidential election, and the effort to overturn Trump’s election defeat, back into the spotlight as early voting begins in Georgia in the 2024 election.

TikTok, Facebook Approve Ads With US Election Disinformation, Study Says – Barron’s
Source Link
Excerpt:

TikTok and Facebook approved advertisements containing blatant US election falsehoods just weeks ahead of the vote, a watchdog investigation revealed Thursday, calling into question the tech platforms’ policies to detect harmful disinformation.

The advocacy group Global Witness submitted eight ads containing false election claims to the Chinese-owned video-sharing app TikTok, the Meta-owned Facebook, and Google-owned YouTube to test their ad systems in the final stretch of the November 5 election.

The ads carried outright election falsehoods — such as people can vote online — as well as content promoting voter suppression, inciting violence against a candidate, and threatening electoral workers and processes.

TikTok “performed the worst,” Global Witness said, approving four of them despite its policy that prohibits all political ads.

Facebook approved one of the ads submitted.

“Days away from a tightly fought US presidential race, it is shocking that social media companies are still approving thoroughly debunked and blatant disinformation on their platforms,” said Ava Lee, the digital threats campaign leader at Global Witness.

WA Supreme Court releases full decisions on challenges to ballot initiatives– www.washingtonexaminer.com
Source Link
Excerpt:

(The Center Square) – The Washington Supreme Court last week released its full decisions regarding a pair of cases involving an attempt earlier this year to keep four initiatives off the ballot. The state’s highest court ultimately rejected removing the initiatives from the ballot.

This November, voters will decide on three Let’s Go Washington-sponsored initiatives that would repeal the capital gains tax, prohibit carbon tax credit trading and repeal provisions of the 2021 Climate Commitment Act, and allow people to opt out of the state’s WA Cares long-term care program. A fourth initiative, sponsored by the Business Industry Association of Washington, would prohibit state and local governments from restricting access to natural gas.

Earlier this year, the anti-initiatives organization Defend Washington filed a lawsuit against Secretary of State Steve Hobbs, claiming signatures to qualify the initiatives for the ballot were gathered illegally. This would mean the measures would need to re-qualify for the ballot.

In another case, the Washington Conservation Action Defense Fund sued Hobbs in an attempt to invalidate the secretary of state’s certification of the initiative to prevent the government from restricting natural gas.

Georgia judge blocks elections rules backed by Pro-Trump Republicans – Reuters
Source Link
Excerpt:

A judge on Wednesday overturned controversial changes to Georgia election rules made by a Republican-controlled state board, the latest defeat for allies of Donald Trump seeking to change how the state’s votes are counted in the Nov. 5 U.S. presidential election, opens new tab.
Judge Thomas Cox struck down a half-dozen new rules that were described by Republicans as necessary election security measures but opposed by Democrats, who said they were aimed at impeding certification of results in a state that could be crucial in selecting the next president.

Court decisions in Michigan and North Carolina deny GOP challenges to overseas voters ABC News
Source Link
Excerpt:

Courts in Michigan and North Carolina on Monday rejected attempts by Republicans to disqualify the ballots of certain overseas voters.

Both cases targeted people who have never lived in the state but were born overseas to parents who were residents of the state. The Michigan case also targeted the spouses of military and overseas voters.

A state judge in Michigan dismissed the Republicans’ case because it was filed so late — less than a month before the Nov. 5 presidential election. But the judge also found that the election language allowing those voters to cast ballots complied with both state and federal law, as well as the Michigan Constitution.

The state GOPs and the Republican National Committee were among the plaintiffs bringing both cases, which were filed as part of a broader legal strategy against overseas ballots in presidential battleground states ahead of the Nov. 5 election.

The RNC did not immediately return requests for comment.

Battleground states flooded with voting lawsuits weeks out from Election Day – nbcnews.com
Source Link
Excerpt:

Political parties and groups have filed nearly 100 lawsuits across seven battleground states that could shape how votes are cast and counted ahead of Election Day and the legal battle that’s expected to follow.

The majority of suits were brought by Republicans and allied groups who are focused on rooting out alleged voter fraud, despite the lack of evidence of its occurring in a widespread way, particularly around mail ballot procedures and noncitizen voting.

Many suits have sought to purge voter rolls or bolster signature and voter identification requirements — or invalidate ballots that don’t meet them — while others have looked to revamp different aspects of election administration, including reducing the use of ballot drop boxes and instituting unusual vote-counting protocols, like requiring that ballots be counted by hand.

Lawsuits from Democrats and allied groups have focused mostly on expanding voting access by trying to extend registration deadlines or appealing for broader interpretations of laws about absentee ballots and voter identification.

?u=https%3A%2F%2Flive.staticflickr.com%2F65535%2F48004568736_f9faebc693_b.jpg&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=b7d42ad093e66fe8b55431b41b9263cf5aa6e8d4ef982c5b57fb2262c05128a2&ipo=images

CBS News’ 60 Minutes was caught deceptively editing an answer given by DNC-CCP Presidential candidate Kamala Harris that highly favored the current Vice President. Donald Trump has called for CBS to have their license revoked and one group has filed a formal ethics complaint against the company.

The use of an alleged news platform to create a de facto campaign ad for the DNC-CCP is, on its face, illegal. Many, including this writer, have been calling on GOP Attorneys General to investigate these “news outlets” that are nothing more than DNC-CCP info terror machines. CBS’ blatant editing of a trainwreck interview to help Kamala Harris win the 2024 election is just the latest, but more obvious, criminal actions by these DNC-CCP content marketers disguised as news outlets.

CBS has refused to release the full transcript, instead choosing to throw Trump under the base by “pointing out” Trump “refused to the interview while Kamala accepted. It turns out 9 in 10 likely voters believe CBS should release the full transcripts, if not the unedited video.

CBS Faces ‘News Distortion’ Complaint– thefederalist.com
Source Link
Excerpt:

… The Center for American Rights, a Chicago-based public interest law firm, has filed a complaint with the Federal Communications Commission demanding CBS release the unedited 60 Minutes transcript “to set the record straight.”

“This isn’t just about one interview or one network,” Daniel Suhr, president of the Center for American Rights, said in a statement. “This is about the public’s trust in the media on critical issues of national security and international relations during one of the most consequential elections of our time.”

“When broadcasters manipulate interviews and distort reality, it undermines democracy itself. The FCC must act swiftly to restore public confidence in our news media,” Suhr added.

The complaint faces some tough sledding. Earlier this week FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel blasted Trump’s call for CBS to lose its license, asserting the commission “does not and will not revoke licenses for broadcast stations simply because a political candidate disagrees with or dislikes content or coverage.”

“While repeated attacks against broadcast stations by the former President may now be familiar, these threats against free speech are serious and should not be ignored,” Rosenworcel said. “As I’ve said before, the First Amendment is a cornerstone of our democracy.”

Trump Vows to Sue CBS If Full Kamala Harris ’60 Minutes’ Interview Not Released– slaynews.com
Source Link
Excerpt:

President Donald Trump has threatened to sue CBS News for deceptively editing its “60 Minutes” interview with Kamala Harris and hiding the full transcript from the American people.

Trump says he will pursue legal action if the “news” outlet refuses to release the full transcript of its “60 Minutes” interview with Harris, the Democrat presidential nominee.

In a statement, Trump warned that “Litigation has already started.”

CBS has come under fire in recent days, as Slay News reported.

The network was caught airing two different versions of Harris’s response to a question on Israel.

One version was in a promotional clip online and the other was in the actual broadcast interview.

Harris’s response has been deceptively edited to help her campaign.

CBS Still Resisting Release of Full ‘60 Minutes’ Harris Interview– www.dailysignal.com
Source Link
Excerpt:

Former President Donald Trump’s criticism of CBS’ “60 Minutes” interview with Vice President Kamala Harris has triggered the predictable legacy media meltdown. It’s unfortunate.

Trump and Harris supporters should demand CBS come clean about why the network significantly altered Harris’ responses on the Biden-Harris administration’s relationship with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu…

The network has disingenuously claimed that the editing was a standard exercise of its authority to trim interviews for time considerations. That rationale might work for the first answer, where CBS trimmed Harris’ four-paragraph answer down to a single sentence, but it completely ignores the second answer substitution, where “60 Minutes” egregiously swapped one single-sentence answer for another.

Either way, CBS News would typically post the full interview on its website, as many of its news programs often do. But it didn’t do that here.

Since CBS has declined to fully explain the editing controversy, viewers must speculate why the network substituted a different answer to the same prompt. An obvious possibility is that anti-Israel politics are the real driver here.

As a result of its selective editing, CBS removed Harris’ statements about Israeli aid and self-defense and replaced another answer with a statement calling for a cease-fire, which Netanyahu and other Israeli leaders oppose.

9 in 10 Voters Say CBS Should Release Full Kamala Harris Transcript– www.newsbusters.org
Source Link
Excerpt:

Nine in ten voters say CBS should release the full transcript of its October 7 interview with Vice President Kamala Harris which the network edited before airing in an apparent attempt to present Harris’s comments in an unrealistically favorable manner.

CBS issued a statement this week denying allegations that it deceitfully edited Harris’ answers to questions – but, it obdurately continues to refuse to release the full video and transcript of the interview.

By releasing the full transcript of the October 7, 2024 interview, CBS would enable the public to judge whether or not the edits made before airing were biased and made to dishonestly portray Democrat Presidential Candidate Harris’s remarks.

And, Americans overwhelmingly do want to see for themselves what actually took place in the CBS interview, a CAPS/Harris survey finds. (The Harris poll, which has been around since the Sixties, is in no way related to Kamala Harris.)

A national survey of registered voters, conducted October 11-13 by The Harris Poll and HarrisX, asked the following question:

“Should CBS release the full transcript of its interview with Kamala Harris or not release the full transcript?”

Fully 85% of voters – including 87% of Democrats, 88% of Republicans, and 80% of Independents/Others say that, yes, CBS should release the full transcript.

CBS Faces ‘News Distortion’ Complaint– thefederalist.com
Source Link
Excerpt:

… The Center for American Rights, a Chicago-based public interest law firm, has filed a complaint with the Federal Communications Commission demanding CBS release the unedited 60 Minutes transcript “to set the record straight.”

“This isn’t just about one interview or one network,” Daniel Suhr, president of the Center for American Rights, said in a statement. “This is about the public’s trust in the media on critical issues of national security and international relations during one of the most consequential elections of our time.”

“When broadcasters manipulate interviews and distort reality, it undermines democracy itself. The FCC must act swiftly to restore public confidence in our news media,” Suhr added.

The complaint faces some tough sledding. Earlier this week FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel blasted Trump’s call for CBS to lose its license, asserting the commission “does not and will not revoke licenses for broadcast stations simply because a political candidate disagrees with or dislikes content or coverage.”

“While repeated attacks against broadcast stations by the former President may now be familiar, these threats against free speech are serious and should not be ignored,” Rosenworcel said. “As I’ve said before, the First Amendment is a cornerstone of our democracy.”

9 in 10 Voters Say CBS Should Release Full Kamala Harris Transcript– www.newsbusters.org
Source Link
Excerpt:

Nine in ten voters say CBS should release the full transcript of its October 7 interview with Vice President Kamala Harris which the network edited before airing in an apparent attempt to present Harris’s comments in an unrealistically favorable manner.

CBS issued a statement this week denying allegations that it deceitfully edited Harris’ answers to questions – but, it obdurately continues to refuse to release the full video and transcript of the interview.

By releasing the full transcript of the October 7, 2024 interview, CBS would enable the public to judge whether or not the edits made before airing were biased and made to dishonestly portray Democrat Presidential Candidate Harris’s remarks.

And, Americans overwhelmingly do want to see for themselves what actually took place in the CBS interview, a CAPS/Harris survey finds. (The Harris poll, which has been around since the Sixties, is in no way related to Kamala Harris.)

A national survey of registered voters, conducted October 11-13 by The Harris Poll and HarrisX, asked the following question:

“Should CBS release the full transcript of its interview with Kamala Harris or not release the full transcript?”

Fully 85% of voters – including 87% of Democrats, 88% of Republicans, and 80% of Independents/Others say that, yes, CBS should release the full transcript.

CBS Still Resisting Release of Full ‘60 Minutes’ Harris Interview– www.dailysignal.com
Source Link
Excerpt:

Former President Donald Trump’s criticism of CBS’ “60 Minutes” interview with Vice President Kamala Harris has triggered the predictable legacy media meltdown. It’s unfortunate.

Trump and Harris supporters should demand CBS come clean about why the network significantly altered Harris’ responses on the Biden-Harris administration’s relationship with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu…

The network has disingenuously claimed that the editing was a standard exercise of its authority to trim interviews for time considerations. That rationale might work for the first answer, where CBS trimmed Harris’ four-paragraph answer down to a single sentence, but it completely ignores the second answer substitution, where “60 Minutes” egregiously swapped one single-sentence answer for another.

Either way, CBS News would typically post the full interview on its website, as many of its news programs often do. But it didn’t do that here.

Since CBS has declined to fully explain the editing controversy, viewers must speculate why the network substituted a different answer to the same prompt. An obvious possibility is that anti-Israel politics are the real driver here.

As a result of its selective editing, CBS removed Harris’ statements about Israeli aid and self-defense and replaced another answer with a statement calling for a cease-fire, which Netanyahu and other Israeli leaders oppose.

A recent call by eleven alleged Republican former prosecutors to investigate Elon Musk for election violations has drawn attention to a man whose Empire is under numerous assaults from numerous governments, including the Federal government of the United States of America.

The 11 Republicans, which include former New Jersey Governor Christine Todd Whitman, want nothing more than prison for Musk, claiming, “Federal law, 52 U.S.C. § 10307(c), imposes up to five years in prison on anyone who ‘knowingly or willfully . . . pays or offers to pay or accepts payment . . . for registration to vote.’”

Biden-Harris DOJ Confirms Request to Investigate Elon Musk’s Pro-Trump Election Activity– www.westernjournal.com
Source Link
Excerpt:

Former Republican Justice Department and other officials sent a letter Monday to Democratic Attorney General Merrick Garland requesting he open an investigation into billionaire Elon Musk’s cash prizes to registered voters in swing states.

Musk, through his America PAC, is selecting a $1 million lottery winner each day until the election to registered voters who sign a petition saying they support the First and Second Amendments.

The petition signers must be registered voters in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Nevada, Arizona, Michigan, Wisconsin, and North Carolina.

EU Threatens Elon Musk’s Entire Empire with Crippling Fines– wltreport.com
Source Link
Excerpt:

They tried to make a secret deal with him.

That didn’t work.

So, the EU’s new strategy?

If X can’t censor, they’re not just coming after X—they’re targeting SpaceX and Neuralink too.

That’s right, regulators are considering lumping Musk’s other businesses into the mix.

They’re trying to calculate the largest fines they can invent.

That doesn’t sound very ethical or legal.

Elon responded to it with “That would be an insane precedent to set.”

Yahoo Finance reports:

The European Union has warned X that it may calculate fines against the social-media platform by including revenue from Elon Musk’s other businesses, including Space Exploration Technologies Corp. and Neuralink Corp., an approach that would significantly increase the potential penalties for violating content moderation rules.

Under the EU’s Digital Services Act, the bloc can slap online platforms with fines of as much as 6% of their yearly global revenue for failing to tackle illegal content and disinformation or follow transparency rules. Regulators are considering whether sales from SpaceX, Neuralink, xAI and the Boring Company, in addition to revenue generated from the social network, should be included to determine potential fines against X, people familiar with the matter said, asking not to be identified because the information isn’t public.